A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Low and high altitude airways



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old September 9th 03, 01:18 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mike Rapoport wrote:


Since Victor airways don't exist above 17,500, that is one way of filing

the
route without filing an airway that doesn't exist for the flight levels.

More
typically, that is the way ATC will issue a clearance to fly a Victor

airway
when in the flight levels. If they have you on radar it is a perfectly
acceptable practice. It works well in Montana, but not very good in New

Jersey.
;-)


Not nessesarily. I get cleared on Victor airways above FL180 in SoCal all
the time.

Mike
MU-2


I don't doubt it for a moment. Nonetheless, controllers can't change FARS.
Victor airways don't exist up there. They used to state "via the radials of..."
but that's too much work these days.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.