A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Outer Marker



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 22nd 04, 06:44 PM
Ron Rosenfeld
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 09:29:01 -0500, "Barry" wrote:

When doing an ILS approach, with the glideslope, is it a requirement to be
able to identify the outer marker or a substitute? FAR 91.175(k) lists the
outer marker as one of the "basic ground components" and gives the acceptable
substitutes, but doesn't explicitly say that it's required. The AIM 1-1-9(j)
on "Inoperative Components" mentions the localizer and glideslope, but says
nothing about the outer marker.

If you answer, please give a specific FAA reference that says whether or not
the OM or a substitute is required.


Identification of the OM is not required but why do you think there will be
a specific reference to say that something is NOT required?

It's a good idea to check the OM, **if there is one**, in order to confirm
your GS altitude at that point, but there is no legal requirement.

You may also note that there is no "penalty" if an OM is not functioning.
Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)
  #2  
Old January 25th 04, 10:57 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Barry wrote:


If you answer, please give a specific FAA reference that says whether or not
the OM or a substitute is required.

You guys that want a specific reference should buy Summit's Aviation Reference
Library and do your own research.


  #3  
Old March 3rd 04, 11:22 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Barry wrote:

When doing an ILS approach, with the glideslope, is it a requirement to be
able to identify the outer marker or a substitute? FAR 91.175(k) lists the
outer marker as one of the "basic ground components" and gives the acceptable
substitutes, but doesn't explicitly say that it's required. The AIM 1-1-9(j)
on "Inoperative Components" mentions the localizer and glideslope, but says
nothing about the outer marker.

If you answer, please give a specific FAA reference that says whether or not
the OM or a substitute is required.


Whenever someone makes a post requesting specific FAA references, you are in
effect asking for someone else to do your research for you an challenging them in
the process. When I see I post like that I recommend you hire a Washington DC
top end aviation law firm and pay for the precision you expect.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TKM MB75 Marker Beacon Receiver Darrel Toepfer Home Built 0 August 18th 04 10:31 PM
KR-21 marker beacon pinout? JFLEISC Home Built 0 March 17th 04 10:46 PM
Canard planes swept wing outer VG's? Paul Lee Home Built 8 January 4th 04 08:10 PM
Marker Beacon Antenna - Paging Jim Weir. Bart D. Hull Home Built 1 November 27th 03 10:31 PM
marker beacon Gary Gunn Instrument Flight Rules 5 November 3rd 03 05:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.