![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a few hours into studying the subject and there is an awful lot
of information, much of it in contradiction. I'm currently reading through all the articles linked to Dr. Jack and spent some time on Skew T although I have a hard time putting a lot of value on skew T as it's based on soundings at least one mountain range away from where I fly. I'm trying to narrow it all down to one or two sources I can start with and then add more as I get some understanding of the concepts and I would like any feedback I can get as to which one or two and any information that might help. I have and am reading 'Understanding The Sky'. This is for flying in the Cascade mountain range North of Seattle, mostly. Thanks all, Brian |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 23, 4:28*pm, brianDG303 wrote:
I have a few hours into studying the subject and there is an awful lot of information, much of it in contradiction. I'm currently reading through all the articles linked to Dr. Jack and spent some time on Skew T although I have a hard time putting a lot of value on skew T as it's based on soundings at least one mountain range away from where I fly. I'm trying to narrow it all down to one or two sources I can start with and then add more as I get some understanding of the concepts and I would like any feedback I can get as to which one or two and any information that might help. I have and am reading 'Understanding The Sky'. This is for flying in the Cascade mountain range North of Seattle, mostly. Thanks all, Brian You can get forecast skew-t soundings from all the forecast models for any location and in my experience these are usually better than actual soundings. I fly near Tucson where we have daily soundings (one of the radiosondes landed on our gliderport last year) but find they are often hopelessly optimistic. Looking at the relatively rapid-cycle models (RUC and NAM) will generally give you a better idea, especially when they are in genral agreement. The models incorporate data from actual soundings. I have links on my soaring website to skew-t useful locations around our state, but these days often just use the skew-T function from XCSKies. Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BLIPMAPS and GPS_LOG | Henryk Birecki | Soaring | 0 | June 7th 07 10:19 PM |
2004 Election predictions | N9NWO | Naval Aviation | 4 | November 1st 04 12:35 PM |
Blipmaps | Tom Ruble | Soaring | 4 | May 27th 04 02:48 AM |
ETA BLIPMAPs | DrJack | Soaring | 0 | March 1st 04 03:18 AM |
Dr Jack's BLIPMAPS | Jim | Soaring | 7 | December 2nd 03 08:44 PM |