![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90
Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It looks like a Dragonfly to me. Composite canard, VW engine. It was/is
a plans-built aircraft that came out shortly after the Q2/Q200. Same concept as the Q2, but not nearly as hot with lower landing and cruise speeds. While Rutan did the airframe design for the Quickie, the Q2 was done by Gary LaGare (sp?). Rutan didn't like the finished design of either of these airplanes, especially the Q2/Q200. One sees tricycle versions of the Q2/Q200. The Tri-Q was an aftermarket kit. Jim Oliver Arend wrote: http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90 Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"jim ham" wrote in message
... It looks like a Dragonfly to me. Composite canard, VW engine. It was/is a plans-built aircraft that came out shortly after the Q2/Q200. Same concept as the Q2, but not nearly as hot with lower landing and cruise speeds. While Rutan did the airframe design for the Quickie, the Q2 was done by Gary LaGare (sp?). Rutan didn't like the finished design of either of these airplanes, especially the Q2/Q200. One sees tricycle versions of the Q2/Q200. The Tri-Q was an aftermarket kit. Jim Oliver Arend wrote: http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90 Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver probably correct http://www.greatplainsas.com/dragon.html I have a friend with one and he replaced his VW engine with a 6 cylinder Jabiru engine, better economy and faster as well. -- Flying RA Aus, because its cheaper and I can do it more often :-) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hard to tell. Some Dragonflies seem to have the main gear arranged
like the Q2, that's on the tips of the forward wing, others have the "regular" main gear. What's also lacking from both the Q2s and the Dragonflies is the third, very small horizontal surface on top of the vertical stabilizer. It was probably just added because of CG issues ... Thanks, Oliver |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oliver Arend wrote:
Hard to tell. Some Dragonflies seem to have the main gear arranged like the Q2, that's on the tips of the forward wing, others have the "regular" main gear. What's also lacking from both the Q2s and the Dragonflies is the third, very small horizontal surface on top of the vertical stabilizer. It was probably just added because of CG issues ... With the Q2, the T-tail was added early on by some builders to help with elevator authority when the canard was loaded with bugs or when in the rain. Quickie Aircraft then came out with a design that added vortex generators along the top of the canard to fix this. The vortex generators really work. There is still some controversy on whether the T-tail worked. Later with the Q-200 Quickie Aircraft changed the canard airfoil which fixed the problem for good. I don't know about the Dragonfly. Jim Thanks, Oliver |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Oliver Arend" wrote in message ... http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90 Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver What is the difference between a Dragonfly and a Q-2? The Q-2 (or Q-200, or "Q-bird" generically) has a more rounded fuselage bottom that has a distinct longitudinal curvature to it. Other than that, it is very difficult to tell them apart unless you are up close. The Q-birds have shorter wings (thus higher wing loading) and fly faster than a Dragonfly. Their instrument panels are larger. Other than that, the canard configuration, the location of the fuel tank, the center stick, and many other characteristics make the 2 airplanes look so similar that SOMEONE must have been cheating when they designed their plane. Gary LaGare is the designer of the Q-2, and Bob Walters the designer of the Dragonfly. Both of them copied Burt Rutan's single-seater Quickie design. Above from this page-- http://www.davemorris.com/dave/dfly-faq.html When I visited Rex Taylor at Eloy, AZ. in 1984 the trike gear was just being developed. He said that some pilots were having trouble with the wide stance gear so they were making the trike gear as an option. -- We have met the enemy and he is us-- Pogo Anyolmouse |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tandem? it's a side-by-side. Tandem refers to a front-back seating
arrangement. It looks like a Dragonfly for sure, and those were all side-by-side. On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:44:04 -0800 (PST), Oliver Arend wrote: http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90 Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
rich wrote: On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:44:04 -0800 (PST), Oliver Arend wrote: http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90 Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver Tandem? it's a side-by-side. Tandem refers to a front-back seating arrangement. It looks like a Dragonfly for sure, and those were all side-by-side. It's a tandem wing configuration design, which is what I understood the OP to refer to. Tandem can refer to more than seating configuration, including things like tandem landing gear, like the B-52's dual tandem gear (with outriggers). |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:10:51 -0500, rich
wrote: Tandem? it's a side-by-side. Tandem refers to a front-back seating arrangement. It looks like a Dragonfly for sure, and those were all side-by-side. On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:44:04 -0800 (PST), Oliver Arend wrote: http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90 Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver it is probably a Quickie Q2 with a mod for a non typical engine. I'm told that you can pick the quickie aircraft from the dragonfly by looking at the underside of the aft fuselage. the quickies are curved and the dragonflys are straight. Stealth Pilot |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 29, 12:44*pm, Oliver Arend wrote:
http://ruben.members.selfnet.de/foru...file.php?id=90 Seen in the Technik-Museum in Speyer, Germany. Searching for the registration D-EAAQ turns up Cessna 172 and Klemm L35, so that can't be it. There's the logo of the Air Power 09 Steiermark on both sides; their site doesn't show anything about this plane. It's very similar to the Rutan Quickie, but the main gear arrangement is different. I'm sure it's an experimental, though. Oliver Yep, that's a Dragonfly. The outrigger main gear was sometimes a handful for some pilots, so some modified the canard and put the gear where you see it. Gary LeGare's Q2 was built more for speed, but the Dragonfly more for efficiency. I believe it originally was designed for and had good performance with a 45 h.p. VW engine, but most went for more h.p. I built and flew Rutan's Q1. Nice plane, especially after I replaced the Onan with a Rotax. Great fun to fly. Neal |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tandem-wing Airplanes | Phil J | Piloting | 69 | February 9th 08 03:37 PM |
What type of plane is this? - Chicos.jpg (1/1) | Rio | Aviation Photos | 7 | January 28th 08 02:48 PM |
What type of plane is this? | Rio | Aviation Photos | 0 | January 28th 08 02:18 AM |
Yaw control in a tandem rotor helo? | Ash Wyllie | Piloting | 0 | January 14th 07 01:33 AM |
Tandem Mi-26? | PDR | Military Aviation | 6 | June 6th 04 10:49 AM |