![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have got into plotting NACA profiles by computing. Humbly beginning
with the simplest, which I presume to be NACA 4-digit, I found the Wikipedia page as a prime source of information. Plotting a symmetrical profile is not that hard: at regular intervals (=X along the chord), one calculates the thickness (=2*Y) and plots a dot at X,+Y and another at X,-Y . The formula for the thickness is netaly given in the wikipedia page, neat! The first step of assymetrical is just as easy: draw the camber line by calculating its offset from the chord at regular intervals. From the camber line. intrados and extrados points are again a vector away; and the magnitude of the vector is calculated in the same way. What beats me however is that, if I interpret the wikipedia page correctly, this vector should be considerd perpendicular to the camber line, where I would expect it to be vertical, i.e. perpendicular to the chord. Any comments here? Is my understanding of the wikipedia page correct? If so, what's a useable algorithm to plt intrados and extrados? And also, less poignant but still: How do I calculate from the basic parameters the behaviour of the profile, i.e. the Cl curves? And perhaps other nice info like the leading edge diameter? Generally: any pointers to in-depth information that a non-engineer can mentally digest? TIA, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If so, what's a useable algorithm to plt intrados and extrados?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_ai...t_NACA_airfoil dy_c/dx you can get by differentiating between two arbitrarily chosen points on the camber line. You'll probably need closer spacing of these points near the leading edge. How do I calculate from the basic parameters the behaviour of the profile, i.e. the Cl curves? What are you looking for? Slope will be very close to 2 pi ;-) The angle of attack of zero lift is -2 f/t (f/t is maximum camber relative to chord). The cm is more difficult to estimate -- it's easiest to just plug the airfoil into XFOIL and do the calculation (or do you prefer http://www.iag.uni-stuttgart.de/IAG/...lettheorie.pdf ?). The rest, like clmax, are viscous effects and can't simply be deducted/estimated from the basic parameters. And perhaps other nice info like the leading edge diameter? For NACA 4-digit-series, see the Wikipedia page. Generally: any pointers to in-depth information that a non-engineer can mentally digest? We would need more information on what you are actually looking for. It could be structural properties of the airfoil (which XFOIL can handle as well ;-). Oliver |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oliver Arend schreef:
If so, what's a useable algorithm to plt intrados and extrados? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NACA_ai...t_NACA_airfoil dy_c/dx you can get by differentiating between two arbitrarily chosen points on the camber line. You'll probably need closer spacing of these points near the leading edge. So weit war ich ja schon...* How do I calculate from the basic parameters the behaviour of the profile, i.e. the Cl curves? What are you looking for? Slope will be very close to 2 pi ;-) **Bis hier bin ich auch noch dabei! The angle of attack of zero lift is -2 f/t (f/t is maximum camber relative to chord). The cm is more difficult to estimate -- it's easiest to just plug the airfoil into XFOIL and do the calculation XFOIL muss es sein was mir fehlte!*** (or do you prefer http://www.iag.uni-stuttgart.de/IAG/...lettheorie.pdf ?). Mm, mal schauen, nur nicht gerade jetzt.**** The rest, like clmax, are viscous effects and can't simply be deducted/estimated from the basic parameters. Schade***** Oliver, besten dank! KA * Nothing new there ** This also was more or less mastered before *** This must be what I was missing **** Will have a look, not right now though ***** Too bad. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jan olieslagers wrote:
/snip/ How do I calculate from the basic parameters the behaviour of the profile, i.e. the Cl curves? And perhaps other nice info like the leading edge diameter? Generally: any pointers to in-depth information that a non-engineer can mentally digest? TIA, I think you would be best served by a 2-D flow visualizer of which there are several out there. I don't think hand computation of reasonable values for lift n drag are reasonable objectives. Brian W |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brian whatcott schreef:
jan olieslagers wrote: /snip/ How do I calculate from the basic parameters the behaviour of the profile, i.e. the Cl curves? And perhaps other nice info like the leading edge diameter? Generally: any pointers to in-depth information that a non-engineer can mentally digest? TIA, I think you would be best served by a 2-D flow visualizer of which there are several out there. I don't think hand computation of reasonable values for lift n drag are reasonable objectives. Hand computing wasn't really my idea. I've some nice machines down here called computers. In today's world of office productivity it is lightly overlooked, still there it is: computers are cheap and plenty today - and computation is what they were originally meant for. I do mean to apply this mechanical computation to describe and plot airfoils. As for the flow visualisers: I'll be grateful for a suggestion of one I can run from the Linux command line. Thanks again, KA |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 7, 10:37*am, jan olieslagers
wrote: As for the flow visualisers: I'll be grateful for a suggestion of one I can run from the Linux command line. Thanks again, KA http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/javafoil.htm ? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jan olieslagers wrote:
/snip/ I think you would be best served by a 2-D flow visualizer of which there are several out there. I don't think hand computation of reasonable values for lift n drag are reasonable objectives. /snip/ As for the flow visualisers: I'll be grateful for a suggestion of one I can run from the Linux command line. Thanks again, KA I tried an early version of Drela's Xfoil. It is available now in several suitable flavors he http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/ Can't remember whether these distributions include the data for the many foils held by U.Illinois. Probably do? Brian W |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
brian whatcott schreef:
I tried an early version of Drela's Xfoil. It is available now in several suitable flavors he http://web.mit.edu/drela/Public/web/xfoil/ Thank you, XFOIL had already been mentioned by Oliver too. I will first explore the Java program mentuioned by Leon@caspercity, it seems to come close to my natural habitat. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was not aware that anyone on this group might never have heard of
XFOIL ;-) Airfoil coordinates, more than you can handle, are he http://www.ae.uiuc.edu/m-selig/ads/coord_database.html Some of the files are in XFOIL format (1 line with name, the rest coordinates from the trailing edge over extrados, leading edge and intrados back to the trailing edge), some are in Eppler format (1 line with name, 1 line with number of coordinates, coordinates for extrados from LE to TE, coordinates for intrados). Enjoy! Oliver |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jan olieslagers wrote:
And also, less poignant but still: How do I calculate from the basic parameters the behaviour of the profile, i.e. the Cl curves? And perhaps other nice info like the leading edge diameter? Generally: any pointers to in-depth information that a non-engineer can mentally digest? Have you checked out some of the links at CFD Online: http://www.cfd-online.com/ In particular, they have links to various software around the web: http://www.cfd-online.com/Links/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calculations for Flying | javawizard | Piloting | 11 | October 18th 07 05:22 PM |
NACA Numbers??? | c hinds | Home Built | 3 | October 11th 04 09:40 PM |
NACA Chord Balance point | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 3 | April 27th 04 06:05 AM |
Reverse NACA duct | Chris W | Home Built | 22 | October 28th 03 10:59 PM |
NACA duct ventrui | Chris W | Home Built | 7 | October 27th 03 04:11 PM |