![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm new to experimental aircraft and am surprised by a number of
things. The first was a peek inside a Lycoming IO-360. I've spent most of my life around things mechanical...from building cars and racing motorcycles so my first look inside a Lycoming was a surprise. Given the size of the reciprocating components, it'd appear that the engine beats itself to death before it wears anything out. The size of the connecting rod pins, push rods, and valve spring pressures, on the surface, seem to be way out of scale for a 180 HP engine. Thin walled wrist pins that withstand 7000 HP in Funny Cars and push rods that weigh in grams, not pounds that withstand 700 HP and 8000 RPM are common place, even in "hot" street machines. I guess what I'm most curious about is why this technology, common place for 20 years, is not included in certificated engines? I was also stymied by some odd looking (excuse me for using the wrong terminology) floating counter weights on the crankshaft. I'd expected to see a solid, balanced crank. Can anyone help me understand the advantage to have floating weights? Why do you suppose they made the cylinder and head a single piece? There are some pretty reliable, high horse power, high cylinder pressure motorcycle engines that use a separate head and cylinder. If the single piece was better, I'd expect factory race teams to follow suit. Any help would be appreciated. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Any Information on Super Stinker (S1-11B) | Martin Morgan | Aerobatics | 1 | December 29th 03 05:34 PM |
How to obtain information? | Toks Desalu | Home Built | 1 | July 25th 03 07:27 AM |