![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A national glider transponder code? Not so fast!!
For many years, SSA has been asking the FAA to establish a single transponder code to be used by gliders nationwide when they were in VFR flight and not in radio contact with air traffic control. It is our belief that the assignment of a discrete code to gliders would enable local ATC tower personnel to better interpret the transponder returns from glider radar targets and so better advise local power traffic as to the nature of our aircraft. Combined with education of FAA air traffic controllers as to the meaning of the discrete glider transponder code and the nature of glider operations, we believe that the use of a transponder code dedicated to gliders would lead to safer glider flight operations. SSA’s efforts have been led by several dedicated volunteers, and in recent years particularly by Steve Northcraft and Cindy Brickner. Their efforts bore fruit this past year when a few brave employees of the FAA in Washington took on as a project implementation of this idea of a national glider transponder code. The result was a "Document Change Proposal" by the FAA, issued in January 2009, to establish code "0000" as a transponder beacon code to be used nationwide by gliders flying outside Class A or B airspace and not in contact by radio with ATC. The tentative implementation date for the code was set as February 11, 2010. In the time since this proposal was first circulated, we have waited eagerly to hear what progress it had made. Much to our frustration, the bureaucracy went silent and it has been difficult to learn what was happening. Was the national code going to become the law of the land on February 11, 2010 or was it one more good idea that was going to be shot down for reasons unknown to the public at large? This past week, we were notified by several western state glider pilots that a change had been made to the "National Beacon Code Allocation Plan," which is set forth in an obscure FAA document called Order JO 7110.66D, change effective 11/16/2009. Under the terms of this document, transponder code 1201 (rather than the earlier proposed code 0000) is now set aside for glider use nationally. Those interested can read the document at http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m...110.66D%20.pdf Jumping to conclusions, many of us assumed that the FAA’s proposal for a national glider transponder code had been quietly and mysteriously implemented without fanfare through Order JO 7110.66D. Accordingly, we heralded far and wide the arrival of a national glider transponder code. I was one of those who loudly announced the effect of JO 7110.66D as being the culmination of our efforts. Nevertheless, I was troubled by reports from glider pilots this past weekend that Air Traffic Control operators seemed unaware of the change. I was also troubled, independently, by the apparently stealthy nature of the implementation. And so, on Monday I called the FAA in Washington to find out what the heck was going on. What I learned is that WE ARE CLOSE, BUT WE ARE NOT THERE YET. In order to implement the use of a discrete, single transponder code dedicated to glider operations nationally several things all have to come together. First, the FAA (which controls the assignment of transponder – or beacon – codes), had to agree to assign a dedicated code to glider operations. The FAA has indeed finally done so and – after bureaucratic battles with which I will not here entertain you – the deed is done and the FAA has set aside code 1201 for use by gliders operating in VFR flight and not in contact with ATC. Significantly, ATC stations may not assign (at least, may not legally assign) 1201 to other forms of aircraft, with one exception – by FAR regulation code 1201 is also used by power traffic transiting through the LAX Class B airspace. Unfortunately, formally dedicating a transponder code is but the first step in the process. The FAA has yet to implement three other procedural changes (all of which were described in the January 2009 FAA Document Change Proposals) required to make the 1201 code actually useful. These other changes are crucial as these are the changes that make modifications to ATC procedures manuals (which tell air traffic controllers what the 1201 code is and what to do with a target that carries it) and to the Aeronautical Information Manual, or AIM (which tells the pilot community what the code is). The implementation of these additional document changes have been held up by still further discussions within the FAA. In conclusion, (1) the FAA has officially set aside beacon code 1201 for use by gliders nationally and by power traffic transiting through the LAX Class B airspace, (2) but the operating procedures manuals that tell air traffic controllers and the flying public what to do with the code have not yet been amended. So, the bottom line is that we are not quite there yet. Glider pilots who try to use the 1201 code are likely to find that the field level ATC controllers have not heard of the change and don’t know what to do with the code. And so, for the present, gliders should continue to squawk either 1200 or whatever local transponder code your soaring club may have worked out with your local ATC office if they wish to fly VFR, outside of Class A and B airspace, and without maintaining contact with ATC (e.g., no flight following service requested.) There are some dedicated FAA employees who are working hard on this project and who are trying to do the right thing. We thank them sincerely for their unselfish efforts which are in the best tradition of the FAA -- that is, working to make flying safer for all of us. I am told that – with luck – they may have the last few pieces of the puzzle in place within the next 30 – 60 days. If and when that happens, I am assured that SSA will be told and we will get the word out to the soaring community. In the meantime, happy soaring and continue to fly safely! Phil Umphres, SSA Chairman & Region 10 Director Cell: 214-558-1285 E-mail: Home: 214-221-0429 Office: 214-999-0035 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks so much for a clear explanation of where things stand and where
they (might) be going, Phil. It's nice to have a definitive input on this important issue. Let me take the opportunity to thank Steve and Cindy for their work. I've seen a number of Cindy's posts on RAS, and it's obvious that she is a hard working, dedicated person doing her very best to advance soaring. It was very disappointing to see her efforts and the SSA in general put down because the FAA made a stealth release of information. I cannot imagine how discouraged you fine folks must get, getting grief from numbskulls that are always part of the problem but never part of the solution. Please do know that a lot of us do indeed appreciate the hard work the SSA volunteers do on our behalf. -John On Apr 7, 1:23 am, Phil Umphres wrote: A national glider transponder code? Not so fast!! For many years, SSA has been asking the FAA to establish a single transponder code to be used by gliders nationwide when they were in VFR flight and not in radio contact with air traffic control. It is our belief that the assignment of a discrete code to gliders would enable local ATC tower personnel to better interpret the transponder returns from glider radar targets and so better advise local power traffic as to the nature of our aircraft. Combined with education of FAA air traffic controllers as to the meaning of the discrete glider transponder code and the nature of glider operations, we believe that the use of a transponder code dedicated to gliders would lead to safer glider flight operations. SSA’s efforts have been led by several dedicated volunteers, and in recent years particularly by Steve Northcraft and Cindy Brickner. Their efforts bore fruit this past year when a few brave employees of the FAA in Washington took on as a project implementation of this idea of a national glider transponder code. The result was a "Document Change Proposal" by the FAA, issued in January 2009, to establish code "0000" as a transponder beacon code to be used nationwide by gliders flying outside Class A or B airspace and not in contact by radio with ATC. The tentative implementation date for the code was set as February 11, 2010. In the time since this proposal was first circulated, we have waited eagerly to hear what progress it had made. Much to our frustration, the bureaucracy went silent and it has been difficult to learn what was happening. Was the national code going to become the law of the land on February 11, 2010 or was it one more good idea that was going to be shot down for reasons unknown to the public at large? This past week, we were notified by several western state glider pilots that a change had been made to the "National Beacon Code Allocation Plan," which is set forth in an obscure FAA document called Order JO 7110.66D, change effective 11/16/2009. Under the terms of this document, transponder code 1201 (rather than the earlier proposed code 0000) is now set aside for glider use nationally. Those interested can read the document athttp://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/JO%207110.66D%20.pdf Jumping to conclusions, many of us assumed that the FAA’s proposal for a national glider transponder code had been quietly and mysteriously implemented without fanfare through Order JO 7110.66D. Accordingly, we heralded far and wide the arrival of a national glider transponder code. I was one of those who loudly announced the effect of JO 7110.66D as being the culmination of our efforts. Nevertheless, I was troubled by reports from glider pilots this past weekend that Air Traffic Control operators seemed unaware of the change. I was also troubled, independently, by the apparently stealthy nature of the implementation. And so, on Monday I called the FAA in Washington to find out what the heck was going on. What I learned is that WE ARE CLOSE, BUT WE ARE NOT THERE YET. In order to implement the use of a discrete, single transponder code dedicated to glider operations nationally several things all have to come together. First, the FAA (which controls the assignment of transponder – or beacon – codes), had to agree to assign a dedicated code to glider operations. The FAA has indeed finally done so and – after bureaucratic battles with which I will not here entertain you – the deed is done and the FAA has set aside code 1201 for use by gliders operating in VFR flight and not in contact with ATC. Significantly, ATC stations may not assign (at least, may not legally assign) 1201 to other forms of aircraft, with one exception – by FAR regulation code 1201 is also used by power traffic transiting through the LAX Class B airspace. Unfortunately, formally dedicating a transponder code is but the first step in the process. The FAA has yet to implement three other procedural changes (all of which were described in the January 2009 FAA Document Change Proposals) required to make the 1201 code actually useful. These other changes are crucial as these are the changes that make modifications to ATC procedures manuals (which tell air traffic controllers what the 1201 code is and what to do with a target that carries it) and to the Aeronautical Information Manual, or AIM (which tells the pilot community what the code is). The implementation of these additional document changes have been held up by still further discussions within the FAA. In conclusion, (1) the FAA has officially set aside beacon code 1201 for use by gliders nationally and by power traffic transiting through the LAX Class B airspace, (2) but the operating procedures manuals that tell air traffic controllers and the flying public what to do with the code have not yet been amended. So, the bottom line is that we are not quite there yet. Glider pilots who try to use the 1201 code are likely to find that the field level ATC controllers have not heard of the change and don’t know what to do with the code. And so, for the present, gliders should continue to squawk either 1200 or whatever local transponder code your soaring club may have worked out with your local ATC office if they wish to fly VFR, outside of Class A and B airspace, and without maintaining contact with ATC (e.g., no flight following service requested.) There are some dedicated FAA employees who are working hard on this project and who are trying to do the right thing. We thank them sincerely for their unselfish efforts which are in the best tradition of the FAA -- that is, working to make flying safer for all of us. I am told that – with luck – they may have the last few pieces of the puzzle in place within the next 30 – 60 days. If and when that happens, I am assured that SSA will be told and we will get the word out to the soaring community. In the meantime, happy soaring and continue to fly safely! Phil Umphres, SSA Chairman & Region 10 Director Cell: 214-558-1285 E-mail: Home: 214-221-0429 Office: 214-999-0035 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Chicago Tracon, Glider Code 1201 | Herb | Soaring | 1 | April 7th 10 12:06 AM |
GAMCC: Glider Aviator's Model Code of Conduct | Roger Worden | Soaring | 0 | May 12th 08 01:45 AM |
Glider Pilot Dress Code | Ken Kochanski (KK) | Soaring | 29 | May 3rd 07 07:59 PM |
Transponder code switching | Ken Pruchnick | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | October 12th 03 08:31 PM |
Transponder code switching | Sven | Piloting | 7 | October 7th 03 05:02 PM |