![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In "Air Forces Monthly" Cdr Burgess wrote in his article about Navy
Reserve, that, as a result of ongoing force transformations and reorganizations, VFC-12 is going to provide pilots to fleet squadrons when a need arises (crisis response, surge deployments etc.), and there are RUMOURS it might be ven redesignated to VFA. Quite similarly, Naval Institute "Proceedings" wrote about an air-to-ground training of VFC-12 (a bit unusual for an adversary squadron), that took place in April 2004. Nobody knows what is gonna happen, and when it happens we will see. But that is an opportunity to ask - what is the real difference between F/A-18C-operating VFA (Strike Fighter Squadron) and F/A-18A/B-flying VFC (Fighter Squadron Composite)? Those names itself for me don't tell the difference... The aircraft is basically the same... And there were several adversary squadrons in the past that wore simple VF or VFA designations... VFA-201 and VFA-204 also sometimes perform as adversary, but they are still VFAs... Kind regards, Jacek Zemlo P.S. By the way, creating a new VFA-12 (IF happens) would be an interesting case for NavAir historians - whose traditions the new squadron should carry on - VFC-12's, or VA-12's which existed in the past? Would that end up with something like VF-103 Sluggers/VF-84 Jolly Rogers designation/tradition merge? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|