![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've recently obtained my multi-eingine rating in a seneca can this complex
aircraft time be used toward the FAR requirement of 10 hours of training in a complex aircraft for a COMMERCIAL SINGLE ENGINE RATING (NOT MULTI). I have about 11.5 complex between the seneca and an Arrow? Thanks in Advance Chris |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chris" wrote in message ...
I've recently obtained my multi-eingine rating in a seneca can this complex aircraft time be used toward the FAR requirement of 10 hours of training in a complex aircraft for a COMMERCIAL SINGLE ENGINE RATING (NOT MULTI). I have about 11.5 complex between the seneca and an Arrow? Thanks in Advance Chris I'd like to take a shot at this one :-) in short, my answer is YES which I justify as follows: disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, but I am trying to become a CFI and would like to see if I understand some of the finer points of interpreting our beloved 14 CFR scriptures... so here it goes: I reckon that you are referring to 61.129(a)(3)(ii) which stipulates the aeronautical experience required for the commercial certificate for an airplane single engine (and I would assume that you do not already hold a commercial certificate in another class of the same category, i.e., that 61.63(c) does not apply); ....so it reads: ''10 hours of training in an airplane that has a retractable landing gear, flaps, and a controllable pitch propeller, or is turbine-powered, or for an applicant seeking a single-engine seaplane rating, 10 hours of training in a seaplane that has flaps and a controllable pitch propeller;'' It says explicitely ''in an airplane'' without specifying whether said airplane is a single engine or not, unlike, for instance, the requirement on 61.129(a)(3)(i) which specifies that at least 5 hours of the required 10 hours of instrument training must be done in a single engine airplane. So, I contend that if the FAA had meant for the complex aircraft to be a single, they would have said so explicitely. voila voila. what do you guys think? --Sylvain ps I got my commercial single engine using the 61.63(c), i.e., as an additional class rating; |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chris" wrote in message ...
I've recently obtained my multi-eingine rating in a seneca and I forgot: congratulations on your multi- rating! --Sylvain |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with Sylvain. I will be getting my SE Commercial one of these days.
While I have ME ATP, I have never flown any SE planes other than C-152/172 and PA-28. Basically, I was going to take the commercial a few months back, but then moved, changed jobs, etc. The CFI's that I spoke with all agreed that all I would need is the necessary dual time (6 hours within 60 days IIRC) and a checkride. So yeah, I believe that the FARs are written the way they are specifically to be interpreted the way Sylvain has. Phil "Chris" wrote in message ... I've recently obtained my multi-eingine rating in a seneca can this complex aircraft time be used toward the FAR requirement of 10 hours of training in a complex aircraft for a COMMERCIAL SINGLE ENGINE RATING (NOT MULTI). I have about 11.5 complex between the seneca and an Arrow? Thanks in Advance Chris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Phil Rynn" wrote in message .net...
I agree with Sylvain. I will be getting my SE Commercial one of these days. While I have ME ATP, I have never flown any SE planes other than C-152/172 and PA-28. Basically, I was going to take the commercial a few months back, but then moved, changed jobs, etc. The CFI's that I spoke with all agreed that all I would need is the necessary dual time (6 hours within 60 days IIRC) and a checkride. So yeah, I believe that the FARs are written the way they are specifically to be interpreted the way Sylvain has. Phil another interesting consequence of already having a commercial or better like yourself in a multi-, is that the aircraft you will be using for the single engine commercial checkride does not have to be a complex either :-) (took my commercial ASEL in a Citabria :-) --Sylvain |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good point. I had initially planned to get my SE commercial in a C172, and
figured the minimum I would have to do was the 6 hrs of instruction and then a checkride. Just haven't had the time to do it yet. Phil "Sylvain" wrote in message om... "Phil Rynn" wrote in message .net... I agree with Sylvain. I will be getting my SE Commercial one of these days. While I have ME ATP, I have never flown any SE planes other than C-152/172 and PA-28. Basically, I was going to take the commercial a few months back, but then moved, changed jobs, etc. The CFI's that I spoke with all agreed that all I would need is the necessary dual time (6 hours within 60 days IIRC) and a checkride. So yeah, I believe that the FARs are written the way they are specifically to be interpreted the way Sylvain has. Phil another interesting consequence of already having a commercial or better like yourself in a multi-, is that the aircraft you will be using for the single engine commercial checkride does not have to be a complex either :-) (took my commercial ASEL in a Citabria :-) --Sylvain |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 07:29 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
PC flight simulators | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 178 | December 14th 03 12:14 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |