![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Sydney,
I've got Lightspeeds and although the noise was never a problem, the way they press the bows of the foggles into my brain starts to bother me after awhile. I've often thought about buying a cheap pair of wire frame sunglasses and cutting the bows off them, then also cutting most of the bows off the foggles, leaving the corner pieces of course. Then I thought of drilling several holes in the side pieces of the foggles and weaving the wire frame bows or attaching them to the foggles somehow. Just an idea that admittingly needs some work but it would make the space between the earcup and your head smaller. -- Jim Burns III Remove "nospam" to reply |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Snowbird wrote: We have Lightspeed headsets. We use Foggles for simulated instrument training. Jeppshades work with Lightspeed headsets and there's nothing to interrupt the ear seal. If you figure out a way to hook a hoodlamb to LS, let me know. I was inspired by the hoodlamb and made something similar out of a folded piece of cardboard and some rubber bands with home-made clips to attach to the headset. I used it for my private but it lacked the easy flip-up/flip-down you'd get with a real hoodlamb. -- Ben Jackson http://www.ben.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That looks like a cool device. Thanks for posting the pointer!
I've been dissatisfied with Foggles too, both because of the discomfort of putting the stems under the headset (I wear contacts instead of glasses, and use Shields sunglasses that have a string instead of stems, so only Foggles present this problem for me), and also because they don't really limit my outside vision adequately. I'd been meaning to try to find or devise some alternative, but so far this year I've been able to stay current just by shooting approaches in benign IFR, so I've kind of forgotten about the foggles. (Sorry, no idea about the widget catalog.) --Gary "Snowbird" wrote in message om... OK, I'd like to tap into the ingenuity of the group here. We have Lightspeed headsets. We use Foggles for simulated instrument training. I don't like it, because the earpieces of the Foggles create a sound gap. I saw a cool product for IFR training which clipped onto the band of a headset with tiny little bands, and flipped up and down to limit one's view or move out of the way. It's called the Hood Lamb (for example: http://www.pilotshop-usa.com/store/i...PARTMENT_ID=78 Unfortunately, it only fits on headsets with steel bands, like DC's or Sigtronics. It looked like something a clever chap ought to be able to duplicate with a bit of ingenuity, given the requisite parts -- some kind of swivel, and some kind of clamp which would fit the wider plastic band of the Lightspeed headsets. There is a clever chap in our house. Can anyone suggest a source of little clamps and the like? (ie a widget catalog?) Thanks! Sydney |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had a hoodlamb since the early '90s, and I love it. It doesn't fit on my
DC headset (don't recall the number, but it is the one with a wide plastic toothed thing instead of stirrups). When I go for training, I just pull out one of the better pairs of sigtronics S20's and use them with the Hoodlamb. Figure I can put up with the headset for the couple of hours of training a year. I got the white hoodlamb, didn't care for the black one, got too dark inside. I also cut the horns off the bottom of the view port, it was too hard to read charts with them there. "Gary L. Drescher" wrote: That looks like a cool device. Thanks for posting the pointer! I've been dissatisfied with Foggles too, both because of the discomfort of putting the stems under the headset (I wear contacts instead of glasses, and use Shields sunglasses that have a string instead of stems, so only Foggles present this problem for me), and also because they don't really limit my outside vision adequately. I'd been meaning to try to find or devise some alternative, but so far this year I've been able to stay current just by shooting approaches in benign IFR, so I've kind of forgotten about the foggles. (Sorry, no idea about the widget catalog.) --Gary "Snowbird" wrote in message om... OK, I'd like to tap into the ingenuity of the group here. We have Lightspeed headsets. We use Foggles for simulated instrument training. I don't like it, because the earpieces of the Foggles create a sound gap. I saw a cool product for IFR training which clipped onto the band of a headset with tiny little bands, and flipped up and down to limit one's view or move out of the way. It's called the Hood Lamb (for example: http://www.pilotshop-usa.com/store/i...PARTMENT_ID=78 Unfortunately, it only fits on headsets with steel bands, like DC's or Sigtronics. It looked like something a clever chap ought to be able to duplicate with a bit of ingenuity, given the requisite parts -- some kind of swivel, and some kind of clamp which would fit the wider plastic band of the Lightspeed headsets. There is a clever chap in our house. Can anyone suggest a source of little clamps and the like? (ie a widget catalog?) Thanks! Sydney -- --Ray Andraka, P.E. President, the Andraka Consulting Group, Inc. 401/884-7930 Fax 401/884-7950 http://www.andraka.com "They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -Benjamin Franklin, 1759 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also have the Hood Lamb. I think it is the greatest view
limiting device I have ever tried. I also have two Sennheiser ANR headsets which like your Lightspeeds will not work with the Hood Lamb. May I suggest a very low tech but pragmatic solution? What headsets did you have before getting the ANRs? If you are like me and many others you probably had David Clarks are similar work alikes. Just reserect on of those and use it for IFR training. (Older ones are also available cheap because of the great movement towards ANRs). Like most people, I don't do hood flying for more than an hour or two at a stretch, so the slightly higher noise of the passive headsets is not really a problem. ~Paul We have Lightspeed headsets. ... I saw a cool product for IFR training which clipped onto the band of a headset with tiny little bands, and flipped up and down to limit one's view or move out of the way. It's called the Hood Lamb Unfortunately, it only fits on headsets with steel bands, like DC's or Sigtronics. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Mennen" wrote in message ...
May I suggest a very low tech but pragmatic solution? What headsets did you have before getting the ANRs? Flightcom Eclipse. Even wider band and less chance of fitting than Lightspeed. So afraid your pragmatic solution won't work for me ![]() If you are like me and many others you probably had David Clarks I have a broad head (some might say "fat" heh heh) and Dave Clarks are "Dave Clamps" to me. I know people who own Dave Clamps but I don't think I could stick 'em, even for an hour ![]() They'd make a good distraction though. Cheers, Sydney |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Snowbird" wrote in message om... I use the ASA clip to sunglasses, folding up/down view limiting device (overcasters). Light and cheap (though more expensive than they need to be for a piece of plastic - the joy of aviation), easy to flip on or off. And yes, I have an old frame with no lenses for "low light" flights. -- Bob PP-ASEL-IA, A/IGI |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell wrote in message ...
My personal device is a flip-up type, which attaches to my glasses the way flip-up clipon sunglasses do. Yeah, I'm really tempted by these, but I prefer to wear contact lenses when flying for better peripheral vision. Our CFI doesn't like pilots he flies with to use hoods. Apparently he had a near-miss involving the blind spot they create. Can't argue with that. I know of one pilot who has made foggles from some wrap-around safety glasses That's what mine a old scratched-up safety glasses with an area of the lens taped over, then attacked w/ sandpaper and a dremel tool. For clamps, check the local home-improvement store or Sears hardware store. You'd be surprised at the stuff you can find there, if you spend some time looking. Didn't see anything juicy at Home Depot, but I'll check Sears and yeah, I coulda looked more and harder at Home Depot. Thanks for input, Stan. Cheers, Sydney |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stan Gosnell wrote in message ...
(Snowbird) wrote in om: Our CFI doesn't like pilots he flies with to use hoods. Apparently he had a near-miss involving the blind spot they create. Can't argue with that. Oh, well........... Have you considered a different CFI? How would that help? The blind spot created by the hood would still be there. And frankly, the hoods I've tried allowed waaaaaay too much cheating. Obviously I haven't tried them all, your favorite may be perfect in this regard. That's what mine a old scratched-up safety glasses with an area of the lens taped over, then attacked w/ sandpaper and a dremel tool. That's extreme. :-) Easier to mask the bottoms, & use some black spray paint. Easier for whom? I can attack something w/ sandpaper or even a dremel tool on the porch while I'm watching my daughter. Spray paint requires clearing and masking an area to catch overspray, then clean up afterwards. The "clearing" is non-trivial in any domecile "Mr. Clutter" (aka my husband) inhabits. Then I have to wait several weeks for enough of the solvent to out-gas that I can stand to be in the same closed space with something that's been painted (it's an asthmatic trigger for me). They're still too thick for me, though. The earpieces on my glasses are very thin wire, & anything thicker just doesn't cut it. Concur, hence my interest in mfr a Hood Lamb equivalent for Lightspeeds. Cheers, Sydney |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lightspeed Comes Through! | Jay Honeck | Owning | 75 | August 25th 03 04:45 PM |
Lightspeed with Foggles question | Rod Madsen | Instrument Flight Rules | 19 | August 22nd 03 03:50 AM |
Lightspeed with Foggles question | Rod Madsen | Owning | 0 | August 18th 03 10:33 PM |
Lightspeed -- Was:Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Jack McAdams | Home Built | 8 | August 14th 03 03:19 PM |
Lightspeed -- Was:Oshkosh 2003 Redux | Jack McAdams | Owning | 8 | August 14th 03 03:19 PM |