![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My two KX 170B NavComs are getting a bit tired. The tuning gears have been
replaced, and after several years are now getting really stiff and hard to turn again. Apart from the mechanical parts, the radios both work just fine. I am looking at three alternatives; having them repaired again, getting the MAC 1700VTX conversion, or replacing them with TKM MX-170B units. The conmversion and the TKM units seem to be about the same price. What is the collective wisdom of this newsgroup? Does anyone have direct experience with both the MAC and TKM products? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a TKM and love it. Even though the prices are about the same,
the TKM Is a NEW radio with 2 years warranty (IIRC). Serviced at the factory n Scottsdale if needed. They used to have a flat rate repair policy that someone mentioned is no longer in effect, not sure. I really haven't heard of any problems with them and everyone seems to like them. On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:40:07 -0400, "Jay Somerset" wrote: My two KX 170B NavComs are getting a bit tired. The tuning gears have been replaced, and after several years are now getting really stiff and hard to turn again. Apart from the mechanical parts, the radios both work just fine. I am looking at three alternatives; having them repaired again, getting the MAC 1700VTX conversion, or replacing them with TKM MX-170B units. The conmversion and the TKM units seem to be about the same price. What is the collective wisdom of this newsgroup? Does anyone have direct experience with both the MAC and TKM products? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What is the collective wisdom of this newsgroup? Does anyone have direct
experience with both the MAC and TKM products? We put the TKM MX-170B in our Warrior. It's great, and is still working great to this day. I thought MAC went out of business? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Somerset" wrote
My two KX 170B NavComs are getting a bit tired. The tuning gears have been replaced, and after several years are now getting really stiff and hard to turn again. Apart from the mechanical parts, the radios both work just fine. I am looking at three alternatives; having them repaired again, getting the MAC 1700VTX conversion, or replacing them with TKM MX-170B units. The conmversion and the TKM units seem to be about the same price. What is the collective wisdom of this newsgroup? Does anyone have direct experience with both the MAC and TKM products? Actually, since your 170B's are still worth $300+ each on eBay (and that's being conservative - I've seen them go for $400+) you better be saving at least that much by going with the TKM over the MAC. And then there's the downtime of having your radios worked on. And the fact is, the electronics are still old. I would avoid the MAC. BTW, the MAC conversion was made by McCoy, and they are out of business. I understand someone else picked up the support. Realistically, if the only problem is that the mechanical parts are getting stiff and hard to turn, a good cleaning may solve your problems. I used to have a MAC and a KX-175B in my plane. Once I had an overvolt condition due to a short in the field line. The KX-175B was fine. The MAC could still transmit and receive, but the digital front end got fried beyond repair, so no display. I now have a 170B where the MAC used to live. Michael |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Jay Somerset"
writes: My two KX 170B NavComs are getting a bit tired. The tuning gears have been replaced, and after several years are now getting really stiff and hard to turn again. Apart from the mechanical parts, the radios both work just fine. I took off the cover and sprayed the gears lightly with a silicon spray and the tuning difficulty was fixed. I know, you wanted a reason for new. I replaced my #1 with a garmin 430 and moved #1 to #2 position. There, I gave you a way to spend more( and get more capability). I love my new setup. Chuck |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
tuning difficulty was fixed. I know, you wanted a reason for new. I
replaced my #1 with a garmin 430 and moved #1 to #2 position. There, I gave you a way to spend more( and get more capability). I love my new setup. Sort'a like this: http://www.gfbyars.com/skylane/P5230031s.JPG More photos at (be sure to scroll down): http://www.gfbyars.com/skylane/index.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Magneto/comm interference on TKM MX-R Narco 120 replacement | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 5 | January 13th 04 02:17 PM |
Magneto/comm interference on TKM MX-R Narco 120 replacement | Eugene Wendland | General Aviation | 5 | January 13th 04 02:17 PM |
Replacement for C130? | John Penta | Military Aviation | 24 | September 29th 03 07:11 PM |
TKM MX-11 Com true slide replacement ? | Rohit Fedane | Owning | 0 | September 21st 03 05:02 PM |
Cheyenne 2 XL - Replacement Parts | Robert Kittredge | Owning | 0 | July 15th 03 03:48 PM |