![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous Monday morning quarterback argument:
"He abdicated complete personal responsibility for any kind of contingency plan or consideration of how he was going to get back with limited fuel." Bruce Hamilton And what the hell else do you expect them to say???? Jerry: You have stretched this about as far as possible. Your logic is flawed and you are coming across as just plane silly. Jimmy Pac sez: Well Guys, I think Jerry actually has a valid point. Government agencies frequently dig in their heels when a public acusation of unreasonablness is levied at them. Ever been over a pole? I bet only one percent of the readers here have. Infrequently, Polar track flights would have to venture that far North due to congestion. But comming from Frankfurt, Sonderstrom and Bodo FIR's would not allow you to proceed into the Polar track system (PTS) unless you had broke into busy HF well prior to approaching the PTS gateway and patiently waited for that essential clearance. Poor planning or Sunspot activity? Tough situation. The Europe H/Lchart stated in boldface you were to not to proceed past that point without that clearance.(means: go into holding and burn up your fuel reserve.) We kept trucking one day without it, (too heavy, no gas to screw around with) and were told 80 miles into the Polar track, when we finally raised them, that we were head-to-head with a Northwest 74 out of PANC at that future altitude. We had to stay at 280 and 290 most of the way and landed with iffy fuel in Anc! We were not popular! But luckily, they didn't turn us in. Poor planning? Irresponsible? Yes, I guess it was. Next time I'll hire a fortune teller to predict those sunspots and ship in 200,000 pounds of fuel inside the arctic cirle somewhere! ;-) The "Asia direct" flying (as it was called) was challenging but fun. Many flights started over 800,000 lbs. Diverting into any old slippery field under 10,000 feet long risked running off the end. And if you turn back every time something goes wrong with the government system, you'll just never get anywhere. No, I say Jon Johanson did all right. Buy that man a Foster's! happy holidays, pacplyer (Ever venture too far in your airplane?) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I don't even bother thinking of the many times when I landed with either a helicopter or airplane on fumes and sweating it out the whole way. Stupid? Nope... just a professional working the best way I can under trying conditions. Doing what the rest work from after we push the envelope and see how buddy you sound like a daredevil thrill seeking idiot you may get a buzz trying to be a man flying aboout on near empty tanks ... intelligent people know better |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Dec 2003 09:49 AM, HiM posted the
following: I don't even bother thinking of the many times when I landed with either a helicopter or airplane on fumes and sweating it out the whole way. Stupid? Nope... just a professional working the best way I can under trying conditions. Doing what the rest work from after we push the envelope and see how buddy you sound like a daredevil thrill seeking idiot you may get a buzz trying to be a man flying aboout on near empty tanks ... intelligent people know better Your email address says it all. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Dec 2003 20:48:24 GMT, Del Rawlins
wrote: On 30 Dec 2003 09:49 AM, HiM posted the following: I don't even bother thinking of the many times when I landed with either a helicopter or airplane on fumes and sweating it out the whole way. Stupid? Nope... just a professional working the best way I can under trying conditions. Doing what the rest work from after we push the envelope and see how buddy you sound like a daredevil thrill seeking idiot you may get a buzz trying to be a man flying aboout on near empty tanks ... intelligent people know better Your email address says it all. It's a rare pilot who hasn't had the weather change unexpectedly, or something fail at a very inopportune time if they've been flying for a while. I'm paranoid about fuel so it's unlikely I'll ever run out, but OTOH **** happens. I carry enough gas to make a 300 to 400 mile detour is necessary. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair?) www.rogerhalstead.com ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HiM" wrote in message ...
I don't even bother thinking of the many times when I landed with either a helicopter or airplane on fumes and sweating it out the whole way. Stupid? Nope... just a professional working the best way I can under trying conditions. Doing what the rest work from after we push the envelope and see how buddy you sound like a daredevil thrill seeking idiot you may get a buzz trying to be a man flying aboout on near empty tanks ... intelligent people know better I don't think you fly for a living do you? One of the most daredevil thrillseeking pilots I know of came from your part of the world. We called him "Dave the Brave" and watched him take off while the rest of us waited for the fog to lift above 200'in Egypt. Dave was killed in Cambodia or someplace like that when a blade came off the russian helicopter he was flying. The reposts I got were that 3 died in that accident. Do you suppose the books are or were written by people who never got above 40mph in an automobile? As I recall there were those who said going that fast would suck the air right out of your lungs and you'd die. No, I am not an idiot and resent the implication. I don't get a buzz flying on near empty tanks. Frankly it scares the crap out of me but I'm not restricted to flying from concrete from point A-B and having someone wipe my nose at each stop. I don't think my ratings and experience indicate a lack of intelligence, but the opposite. Ol Shy & Bashful |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() No, I am not an idiot and resent the implication. I don't get a buzz flying on near empty tanks. ONLY an idiot lifts a plane off the ground with a flight plan that will run him short of fuel Sir .. you are an idiot by your own admission |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HiM" wrote ,snip
ONLY an idiot lifts a plane off the ground with a flight plan that will run him short of fuel "HiM" wrote ,snip HiM, I don't dispute how you state the obvious here. Common sense says this guy Selwaykid is not a commercial pilot with his kind of attitude. But you are actually wrong about this. Polar flights out of Anchorage with some operators use an FAA exemption to take off with inadequate fuel for the real intended destination. It's called re-release. It is perfectly legal, and standard practice to dept for instance: out of Anchorage, Alaska to London Heathrow (LHR) with fuel that will knowingly not get you there with FAR121 required int'l reserves. Though somewhat controversial, this procedure makes the airline money because they can haul more freight instead of gas. How it works is that we file a fake flight plan with the FAA that lists Preswick, Scotland as our destination and then at the computed "re-release" waypoint the seven tanks on the 747 are totaled up by the flight engineer and then the F/O compares this number say 107,500 lbs of fuel to the min 105,300 lbs on the flight plan for re-release. Looking at weather, the Captain makes his decision. We then are legal to call up ATC and refile a new flight plan to what was really our intended destination all along: LHR. If we have say only 104,000, it's now "assholes and elbows" for us to pull out the new flight plans, reprogram the three INS's, get more weather for Preswick, break out and brief the new arrival charts and plates, and mentally prepare for a long duty day (extra leg to get there.) Last time I did this was summer 1989. In cruise the sun stayed up all day and all night (just kind of wobbled around toward the horizon.) pacplyer (hope my vulgar cargo language does not offend BYB. It is less than professional, but that's how we talk in the airplane.) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|