![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi all,
Just thought I'd share a marvelous experience. Over the years I've been in and out of several old single engine cessnas, (c150 and 172's). This morning, (June 29, 2004), I was invited to try out a 2003 Tiger; an invitation I couldn't refuse. I met up with the owner, Gerard at Lantana (KLNA) at 8:30am. It was a calm, slightly overcast, hot day, and pretty typical of summer mornings in Florida. We spent about 20 minutes chatting about the controls and discussed a brief flight plan. For a variety of reasons, I was flying right seat. In a nutshell, "WOW". This aircraft is gorgeous, sleek, purrs like a kitten, flies like a bandit fleeing a bank robbery and is comfy like a Jaguar XJ sedan. The plane I flew has a loaded panel, complete with an autopilot that's slaved to the Garmin GNS 430. You select a target destination on the Garmin, and set the autopilot to take you there. That's it. Push the right buttons, and you're as good as home! The cockpit is drenched in leather, and the slide away cowl gives all the open air you'd expect from a convertible BMW ! In flight we popped open the canopy just a crack, and at just 2,000ft MSL, it felt like a comfy spring day. In the 172, even with the windows open, you slowly cook in July. The Tiger is owned by an ex-Navy pilot, who recently left his position at American Airlines. A truly wonderful person with a passion for his family as well as flying. If there's anyone I'd like to learn from, it's somebody like Gerard. Competent, relaxed, and enthusiastic. If you're in the South Florida area and interested in owning a Tiger, Gerard has set up a fractional ownership plan, which is how I found myself in the seat of this flying wonder. I'd spoken to Gerard a couple of times over the phone, but had never met this pilot before today. I'm back to the drawing board to see how my finances can get me into the left seat, but it's certainly reachable. I could never come up with 1/5th million dollars for a new Tiger, but I can buy 1/4 of it if I sneak out and sell the wife's car (hush). If you're interested in this plane, please tap me an email or call Marty at 561.478.1098. My email is - just dump the z's and change the yyy to .net Hope everyone's having a great summer. Marty from Boiling Hot Sunny South Florida |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think its great when people get out and try new planes. The Tiger is the
most advanced of the sixties planes, so you should really get a kick out of a nineties desgin. Maybe you should try a really new plane before you leap - Lancair, Diamond, and Cirrus make planes utilizing technology and methods that are modern! No, they don't build them like they used to, THANK GOD! On the other hand, if you like retreads billed as "new planes" then Piper reintroduced the Cherokee Six, and Cessna is about to introduce a "new" plane (be on the lookout for yet another configuration of an old spam can). Piper has at least the desire to put out a truly new plane, but Cessna doesn't give a hoot about folks in the sub million dollar plane market. In the meantime, I will be praying that we get a new engine to replace the 40 year old engines used in the truly new planes. "Marty from Sunny Florida" wrote in message ... Hi all, Just thought I'd share a marvelous experience. Over the years I've been in and out of several old single engine cessnas, (c150 and 172's). This morning, (June 29, 2004), I was invited to try out a 2003 Tiger; an invitation I couldn't refuse. I met up with the owner, Gerard at Lantana (KLNA) at 8:30am. It was a calm, slightly overcast, hot day, and pretty typical of summer mornings in Florida. We spent about 20 minutes chatting about the controls and discussed a brief flight plan. For a variety of reasons, I was flying right seat. In a nutshell, "WOW". This aircraft is gorgeous, sleek, purrs like a kitten, flies like a bandit fleeing a bank robbery and is comfy like a Jaguar XJ sedan. The plane I flew has a loaded panel, complete with an autopilot that's slaved to the Garmin GNS 430. You select a target destination on the Garmin, and set the autopilot to take you there. That's it. Push the right buttons, and you're as good as home! The cockpit is drenched in leather, and the slide away cowl gives all the open air you'd expect from a convertible BMW ! In flight we popped open the canopy just a crack, and at just 2,000ft MSL, it felt like a comfy spring day. In the 172, even with the windows open, you slowly cook in July. The Tiger is owned by an ex-Navy pilot, who recently left his position at American Airlines. A truly wonderful person with a passion for his family as well as flying. If there's anyone I'd like to learn from, it's somebody like Gerard. Competent, relaxed, and enthusiastic. If you're in the South Florida area and interested in owning a Tiger, Gerard has set up a fractional ownership plan, which is how I found myself in the seat of this flying wonder. I'd spoken to Gerard a couple of times over the phone, but had never met this pilot before today. I'm back to the drawing board to see how my finances can get me into the left seat, but it's certainly reachable. I could never come up with 1/5th million dollars for a new Tiger, but I can buy 1/4 of it if I sneak out and sell the wife's car (hush). If you're interested in this plane, please tap me an email or call Marty at 561.478.1098. My email is - just dump the z's and change the yyy to .net Hope everyone's having a great summer. Marty from Boiling Hot Sunny South Florida |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dude wrote:
: In the meantime, I will be praying that we get a new engine to replace the : 40 year old engines used in the truly new planes. The diamond twinstar with the Thielert (sp?) engines is a compelling argument that we have a new engine... if the engine lives up to its marketing. -- Aaron Coolidge |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tigers are fast, fun, simple airplanes. But I doubt I'd spend $225k+ for a
new one when you can find nice used ones with exactly the same performance for a third of that. "Marty from Sunny Florida" wrote in message ... Hi all, Just thought I'd share a marvelous experience. Over the years I've been in and out of several old single engine cessnas, (c150 and 172's). This morning, (June 29, 2004), I was invited to try out a 2003 Tiger; an invitation I couldn't refuse. I met up with the owner, Gerard at Lantana (KLNA) at 8:30am. It was a calm, slightly overcast, hot day, and pretty typical of summer mornings in Florida. We spent about 20 minutes chatting about the controls and discussed a brief flight plan. For a variety of reasons, I was flying right seat. In a nutshell, "WOW". This aircraft is gorgeous, sleek, purrs like a kitten, flies like a bandit fleeing a bank robbery and is comfy like a Jaguar XJ sedan. The plane I flew has a loaded panel, complete with an autopilot that's slaved to the Garmin GNS 430. You select a target destination on the Garmin, and set the autopilot to take you there. That's it. Push the right buttons, and you're as good as home! The cockpit is drenched in leather, and the slide away cowl gives all the open air you'd expect from a convertible BMW ! In flight we popped open the canopy just a crack, and at just 2,000ft MSL, it felt like a comfy spring day. In the 172, even with the windows open, you slowly cook in July. The Tiger is owned by an ex-Navy pilot, who recently left his position at American Airlines. A truly wonderful person with a passion for his family as well as flying. If there's anyone I'd like to learn from, it's somebody like Gerard. Competent, relaxed, and enthusiastic. If you're in the South Florida area and interested in owning a Tiger, Gerard has set up a fractional ownership plan, which is how I found myself in the seat of this flying wonder. I'd spoken to Gerard a couple of times over the phone, but had never met this pilot before today. I'm back to the drawing board to see how my finances can get me into the left seat, but it's certainly reachable. I could never come up with 1/5th million dollars for a new Tiger, but I can buy 1/4 of it if I sneak out and sell the wife's car (hush). If you're interested in this plane, please tap me an email or call Marty at 561.478.1098. My email is - just dump the z's and change the yyy to .net Hope everyone's having a great summer. Marty from Boiling Hot Sunny South Florida |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:21:21 GMT, "OtisWinslow"
wrote: Tigers are fast, fun, simple airplanes. But I doubt I'd spend $225k+ for a new one when you can find nice used ones with exactly the same performance for a third of that. Yes, but isn't that true of all the new planes? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just the retreads.
The people that are investing in new airframes need our support. Next time you here some so and so throw out a cute remark about how nothing was or will ever be better than a "blank", just smack them. They are trying to sound old and wise and cool, but they are killing GA. If the plane you always wanted is now being made new, and you want one, then buy it. But don't go around saying people are stupid for buying one of the new planes. I am tired of hearing it from people who don't know I have one. Mostly, its old FBO guys who start eating their words when they realize they just PO'd a likely customer. They also get dumb looks on their faces when I point out that their business has never grown because they NEVER changed it. Can anyone point out an industry with less change that has grown? Believe it or not, there have been advances in everything except aviation for the last forty years. The first really new piston designs since the sixties are now out, and many of them ARE superior. I will get off the stump now, thanks. "Stu Gotts" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:21:21 GMT, "OtisWinslow" wrote: Tigers are fast, fun, simple airplanes. But I doubt I'd spend $225k+ for a new one when you can find nice used ones with exactly the same performance for a third of that. Yes, but isn't that true of all the new planes? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dude wrote:
Just the retreads. If it was right in the wind tunnel in 1975, it's right in the wind tunnel today. A brand new Grumman is still a good plane, so don't just write it off. But... The people that are investing in new airframes need our support. Next time you here some so and so throw out a cute remark about how nothing was or will ever be better than a "blank", just smack them. They are trying to sound old and wise and cool, but they are killing GA. ....but if I had the sort of money to buy a brand new plane, it'd be the new Cirrus with the all-glass cockpit. It looks absolutely fantastic. Or possibly a Diamond Twin Star. (I've flown the single-engine DA-40 Star, and it is very lustworthy) There seems to be a lot of OWTs about composite planes - you can just look at the experience with glass gliders over the past 25 years to see that most of them are just that - old wives tales. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't have anything against the Tigers, or really, what I call the
"retreads". They are mostly all excellent machines and the people who build them are doing good work. New Tiger took a big financial risk to bring back a cult favorite. It was a good design that makes some good trade offs. I never understood why they did not sell more in the first place. OTOH, I am dissappointed in a certain market leader that has the financial ability to take the risk on a new plane, but will not. That is a perfectly acceptable business decision for them. Unfortunately, they are doing several things to poison the market and GA in order to continue milking the business they have. Nothing against the planes, but I personally wish something would change with the situation. "Dylan Smith" wrote in message ... In article , Dude wrote: Just the retreads. If it was right in the wind tunnel in 1975, it's right in the wind tunnel today. A brand new Grumman is still a good plane, so don't just write it off. But... The people that are investing in new airframes need our support. Next time you here some so and so throw out a cute remark about how nothing was or will ever be better than a "blank", just smack them. They are trying to sound old and wise and cool, but they are killing GA. ...but if I had the sort of money to buy a brand new plane, it'd be the new Cirrus with the all-glass cockpit. It looks absolutely fantastic. Or possibly a Diamond Twin Star. (I've flown the single-engine DA-40 Star, and it is very lustworthy) There seems to be a lot of OWTs about composite planes - you can just look at the experience with glass gliders over the past 25 years to see that most of them are just that - old wives tales. -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not neccesarily. I'm talking about Tigers only. Some new planes are
indeed a step up from the old stuff. But it's the same old Tiger with a nice interior and a couple 430s. And nothing against Tigers, I used to own one. They're great planes. "Stu Gotts" wrote in message ... On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 12:21:21 GMT, "OtisWinslow" wrote: Tigers are fast, fun, simple airplanes. But I doubt I'd spend $225k+ for a new one when you can find nice used ones with exactly the same performance for a third of that. Yes, but isn't that true of all the new planes? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New WWII movies coming! | The Enlightenment | Military Aviation | 28 | September 12th 04 02:11 AM |
Is there a place for Traditional CAS in the 21st century? | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 87 | March 20th 04 07:05 AM |
"Missile Defense for the 21st Century" | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | March 8th 04 08:35 PM |
Stop Loss is new draft of the 21st Century | Gene Storey | Military Aviation | 0 | December 29th 03 11:57 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |