![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This link is interesting.
http://forums.flyer.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11635 The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only. Whilst the GPS may be IFR certified in the US, Its not in the UK. also with DME and ADF it only possible to fly 4 instrument approaches legally in the UK. Retrofitting DME and ADF is sure going to spoil a pretty panel. Maybe Cirrus will have to work out a way around to allow its aircraft to fly IFR in IMC. Its a shame really because there are lots of potential Cirrus owners in the UK and with the depreciation of the dollar effectively paying for the VAT on import they are could be a good buy. Its a pretty expensive plane to have sports plane privileges only cb |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris" wrote in message ... This link is interesting. http://forums.flyer.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=11635 The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only. Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the last century rather than open their markets to real competition. They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress free trade instead of a tool to encourage it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, that is not the reason.
As I recall right the Cirrus aircraft are not JAA approved as a whole. If I remember well it has something to do with the stall tests. And the same works the other way, if a part or plane is JAA approved it is not automatically FAA approved so no change of using it in the US. And this is not only related to aircraft(parts). Buy a used or classic car in the US and try to have it legaly road going here you have to change at least the seat belts and head- and tail lights to CE standards. And then you are lucky, wait if something enviromental pops up :-( Export a car to the US and you have the same trouble again. And there are more regions in the world with their own standards and rules. It sometimes drives one mad. -Kees |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I recall right the Cirrus aircraft are not JAA approved as a whole.
The SR20 is, AFAIK. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oops, didn't do my homework.
-Kees |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "C J Campbell" said:
The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only. Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the last century rather than open their markets to real competition. They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress free trade instead of a tool to encourage it. Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to take orders from those damn Europeans"? -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ "The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education." -- Albert Einstein. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... In a previous article, "C J Campbell" said: The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only. Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the last century rather than open their markets to real competition. They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress free trade instead of a tool to encourage it. Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to take orders from those damn Europeans"? No, I think that at root you will still find people trying to stifle competition with unfair trade practices. I am equally dismayed by the behavior of the United States in this area. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Tomblin" wrote in message ... In a previous article, "C J Campbell" said: The story is that in the UK and most of Europe the all glass Cirrus including the 22 is only suitable for VFR flights only. Too bad. The reason, of course, is that Europe would rather remain in the last century rather than open their markets to real competition. They view laws against unfair trade practices as a weapon to suppress free trade instead of a tool to encourage it. Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to take orders from those damn Europeans"? Its mainly about the use of GPS and the lack of appropriate radio nav instruments for the approaches in Europe. Unlike in the US, ADF and DME is widely used for instrument approaches and GPS is not allowed as a substitute because GPS is not certified for IFR. It is only allowed as a supporting aid so the big fancy 480s and 530s are as much value as a handheld. Planes made in Europe and certified for IFR flight in Europe will meet US requirements. I suppose one of the issues is that VORs, DME and ADF are all controllable locally, GPS is not. If the FAA want to allow reliance on a system controlled by the US military then is it up to them, you cannot expect other countries aviation authorities to put their reliance on a system controlled by a foreign power. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris,
GPS is not allowed as a substitute because GPS is not certified for IFR. That statement in its broadness is not true -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul,
Why is it that if the JAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the FAA IFR certifes, like this all-glass Cirrus, it's "unfair trade practices", but if the FAA refuses to IFR certify a plane that the JAA *does* certify for IFR flight, like the Diamond DA-20, it's just "the FAA doesn't have to take orders from those damn Europeans"? Huh? The SR20 IS certified, and the DA-20 is NOT IFR-certified anywhere in the world. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|