![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From NTSB
quote On Oct 14, 2003, at 1600 daylight time, a Wright Redux Association 1903 Wright Flyer, N203WF, piloted by a private plot, received substantial damage on impact with terrain after the airplane stalled during takeoff at an altitude of about 30 feet at the Clow International Airport, Bolingbrook, IL. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The private pilot was uninjured. The flight was originating at the time of the accident. unquote |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Big John" wrote in message ... From NTSB quote On Oct 14, 2003, at 1600 daylight time, a Wright Redux Association 1903 Wright Flyer, N203WF, piloted by a private plot, received substantial damage on impact with terrain after the airplane stalled during takeoff at an altitude of about 30 feet at the Clow International Airport, Bolingbrook, IL. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The private pilot was uninjured. The flight was originating at the time of the accident. unquote 30 feet of altitude? In an aircraft that is reported to be severely unstable in pitch? That guy must have big brass ones... I'd *try* to keep it in ground effect, if at all possible. More performance, and maybe a reduced chance of a *big* crash. On the other hand, the instability may have led to the aircraft ballooning to 30', which was followed by a stall, then a loud crunching sound. KB |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle,
In an aircraft that is reported to be severely unstable in pitch? Uh, you might want to check into how exact a replica that particular replica is. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Kyle, In an aircraft that is reported to be severely unstable in pitch? Uh, you might want to check into how exact a replica that particular replica is. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) Sounds like that's gonna be tough at this point. ;-) KB |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kyle,
LOL. The first aircraft capable of making turns was the 1904 Flyer, IIRC. The first full circle was flown in 1905, IIRC. So the 1903 Flyer wasn't good for more than the hops it did - as you wrote. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Kyle, LOL. The first aircraft capable of making turns was the 1904 Flyer, IIRC. The first full circle was flown in 1905, IIRC. So the 1903 Flyer wasn't good for more than the hops it did - as you wrote. But the 1903 was able to fly straight in a stable fashion, indicating a small amount of lateral control and stability. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message t... "Big John" wrote in message ... From NTSB quote On Oct 14, 2003, at 1600 daylight time, a Wright Redux Association 1903 Wright Flyer, N203WF, piloted by a private plot, received substantial damage on impact with terrain after the airplane stalled during takeoff at an altitude of about 30 feet at the Clow International Airport, Bolingbrook, IL. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident. The private pilot was uninjured. The flight was originating at the time of the accident. unquote 30 feet of altitude? In an aircraft that is reported to be severely unstable in pitch? That guy must have big brass ones... I'd *try* to keep it in ground effect, if at all possible. More performance, and maybe a reduced chance of a *big* crash. On the other hand, the instability may have led to the aircraft ballooning to 30', which was followed by a stall, then a loud crunching sound. KB Sounds to me like they reproduced the Wright Brothers first flight in the 1903 Flyer. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kyle Boatright" wrote in message t... 30 feet of altitude? In an aircraft that is reported to be severely unstable in pitch? That guy must have big brass ones... I'd *try* to keep it in ground effect, if at all possible. More performance, and maybe a reduced chance of a *big* crash. I don't know about what "corrections" these guys made to the flyer. The original (and the faithful replicas) are unstable in pitch. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Big John wrote: On Oct 14, 2003, at 1600 daylight time, a Wright Redux Association 1903 Wright Flyer, N203WF, piloted by a private plot, received substantial damage on impact with terrain after the airplane stalled during takeoff at an altitude of about 30 feet at the Clow International Airport, Bolingbrook, IL. Well, at least this one can get off the ground. George Patterson You can dress a hog in a tuxedo, but he still wants to roll in the mud. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G.R.,
Well, at least this one can get off the ground. that's not the point. A replication of the Wright's getting off the ground is done every day by thousands of aircraft. Replicating the aircraft as faithfully as possible is done by one single group. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Even Wright 1905 Flyer Replica Fails to Fly | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 1 | December 24th 03 02:23 PM |
Wright Flyer won't fly! | Trent Moorehead | Piloting | 31 | October 18th 03 04:37 PM |
Wright Flyer | Dave Hyde | Home Built | 9 | September 29th 03 05:20 PM |
Stop the Wright Flyer from flying in Chicago! | Ace Pilot | Piloting | 0 | August 21st 03 01:36 PM |
Wright Flyer Ignition | Dan Thomas | Home Built | 6 | July 22nd 03 03:45 AM |