![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 11:30*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote:
http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/avgas/ Glad the gov is on the job on this one /sarc. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Glad the gov is on the job on this one /sarc.
It’s only a problem for the high compression engines. Lycoming approved 93 octane unleaded auto fuel for the 0-360 a few years ago http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news..._198039-1.html Jim D |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 1:19*am, Jim wrote:
Glad the gov is on the job on this one /sarc. It’s only a problem for the high compression engines. Lycoming approved 93 octane unleaded auto fuel for the 0-360 a few years ago http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...AutoGasApprova... Jim D Right. But this isn't a *technical* problem, is it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 6:31*am, Evan Ludeman wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:19*am, Jim wrote: Glad the gov is on the job on this one /sarc. It’s only a problem for the high compression engines. Lycoming approved 93 octane unleaded auto fuel for the 0-360 a few years ago http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...AutoGasApprova... Jim D Right. *But this isn't a *technical* problem, is it. Actually, it's a very technical problem - something government committees aren't good at dealing with. 'Octane' is just one of a large number of variables which effect how spark ignition fuels perform. Serious AVGAS research ended as the jet age began and a lot of scientific data seems to have been lost in last half century. It's worth keeping in mind that present day engines were designed for 100LL - not the other way around. Since engine design was driven by fuel availability, it's unlikely "drop-in" fuels will perform as well as 100LL in engines not designed to use them. It may even turn out new engines are required. In that case, IMHO, lightweight diesels burning Jet A would be a better choice. Jet A is likely to be around a long time. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 2, 10:25*am, Bill D wrote:
Actually, it's a very technical problem The *availability* of ethanol free auto gas -- which a great many airplanes can use, right now -- is anything but a technical problem. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
gives all free speech for free elections for a free world immediately | Richard[_11_] | Naval Aviation | 0 | March 6th 11 07:57 PM |
100 Low Lead availability - cont. | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 10 | March 6th 08 01:56 AM |
FREE TRIAL - Rent Adult DVDs Online, Delivered Free by Mail. | [email protected] | Piloting | 0 | March 1st 08 05:26 PM |
F18 Hornet Pics -Royalty Free Images and free image hosting - members wanted please | Jpgs.com.au | Home Built | 0 | January 7th 07 01:28 AM |
Broken P lead? | Jim Burns | Piloting | 16 | October 27th 06 08:06 PM |