A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Warrior Down in Danbury, CT



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 8th 04, 01:20 PM
Tom Fleischman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Warrior Down in Danbury, CT

I flew in to Danbury yesterday morning and had to hold for 15 minutes
because the field was closed due to "an incident". After landing I
found out from my A&P that a Warrior had lost power on takeoff and spun
in when the pilot attempted to return to the field. A witness I spoke
with described the engine missing after rotation at about 100 - 200'
AGL, with backfires and black puffs of smoke coming from the exhaust.
The engine faltered, then quit at low altitude. The airplane entered a
turn in an attempt to return to the runway then got slow, stalled, and
went in. The solo pilot was seriously injured in a post-crash fire.

This accident has not yet appeared in the NTSB database at
http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/query.asp.
  #2  
Old January 8th 04, 01:38 PM
Aardvark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Tom Fleischman wrote:
I flew in to Danbury yesterday morning and had to hold for 15 minutes
because the field was closed due to "an incident". After landing I
found out from my A&P that a Warrior had lost power on takeoff and spun
in when the pilot attempted to return to the field. A witness I spoke
with described the engine missing after rotation at about 100 - 200'
AGL, with backfires and black puffs of smoke coming from the exhaust.
The engine faltered, then quit at low altitude. The airplane entered a
turn in an attempt to return to the runway then got slow, stalled, and
went in. The solo pilot was seriously injured in a post-crash fire.

This accident has not yet appeared in the NTSB database at
http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/query.asp.




http://www2.faa.gov/avr/aai/A_0108_N.txt

  #3  
Old January 8th 04, 01:40 PM
HankPilot2002
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The return to the field after an engine loss is one of the toughest decisions a
pilot will ever have to make. My personal minimum will be 800' AGL; or it's
straight ahead into the sod farm.

Hank
  #4  
Old January 8th 04, 04:45 PM
Ron Natalie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"HankPilot2002" wrote in message ...
The return to the field after an engine loss is one of the toughest decisions a
pilot will ever have to make. My personal minimum will be 800' AGL; or it's
straight ahead into the sod farm.

I turned around from about 500 feet. First, there was NOWHERE to go straight
ahead (short of landing on the roof of the Costco). Second, I still had partial power
but I'd throttled way back because of the intense vibration. Third, I didn't have
to make a return to the runway. When I started the turn, my intent was to land
on the airport access road, which parallels the runway. Anyhow I made it
back to the runway, mostly because I had gotten the aircraft cleaned up before
the engine conked, so my glide was a lot better. It wasn't until I was
back over the runway at 100' or so that I remembered to drop the gear.
Fortunately, they come down quick in the Navion.

  #7  
Old January 8th 04, 08:40 PM
Peter R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael 182 ) wrote:

Look for the par 5's - seriously, a golf course isn't a bad option.


Depending, or course, on whether the course is a pro or an amateur course.
A pro course is bound to have very narrow fairways, doglegs, bodies of
water and sand, and undulations.

But given a choice of a dogleg left or a Wal-mart roof during engine
failure on TO, I'll pull out my 3 iron and aim for the Par 5!

--
Peter












----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #8  
Old January 9th 04, 01:06 AM
Maule Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Michael 182"
Look for the par 5's - seriously, a golf course isn't a bad option.

Agreed. Go for golf course. If you fly it on and stay in play, you'll walk
away.

Done it twice in those engineless things. Yes, it's a bit easier.


  #9  
Old January 9th 04, 04:06 AM
R. Hubbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:24:50 GMT "Michael 182" wrote:

Look for the par 5's - seriously, a golf course isn't a bad option.



It's a great option! Just make sure to let othesr play through once
you've landed. And then you might need to head for the 19th.



R. Hubbell


Michael

"Greg" wrote in message
om...
(HankPilot2002) wrote in message

...
The return to the field after an engine loss is one of the toughest

decisions a
pilot will ever have to make. My personal minimum will be 800' AGL; or

it's
straight ahead into the sod farm.

Hank


Wish I had a sod farm at the end. I am doomed. ... and a country club

with lots of trees and more
million dollar homes along the course.



  #10  
Old January 9th 04, 07:54 AM
Hilton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

HankPilot2002 wrote:
The return to the field after an engine loss is one of the toughest

decisions a
pilot will ever have to make.


Actually Hank, it's one of the easiest - just make sure you do it on the
ground before you take off while you have all the time in the world.

Hilton


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.