![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The wheels grind slowly (8 years later).... U.S. regulators said they plan to order modifications on 3,800 commercial airplanes to reduce chances of a fuel tank explosion like the one that brought down TWA Flight 800 in 1996. The initiative, once dismissed as too expensive and impractical for the passenger fleet, could cost the industry at least $530 million over several years, the FAA said. FAA Administrator Marion Blakey said the FAA will propose a regulation later this year requiring the industry to install a fuel tank safety device on new planes made by Airbus and BOEING CO. and retrofit existing aircraft over a 7-year period. Regulations, however, can take years to finalize. The on-board device is designed to reduce the threat of combustion by neutralizing the potentially volatile fuel-air mixture in empty or emptying tanks. This is achieved by replacing oxygen with nitrogen-enriched air. (Reuters 12:24 PM ET 02/17/2004) Mo http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=925...024897a&s=rb04 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Like we believe it was a fuel tank explosion!!!
Please..... "Larry Dighera" wrote in message ... The wheels grind slowly (8 years later).... U.S. regulators said they plan to order modifications on 3,800 commercial airplanes to reduce chances of a fuel tank explosion like the one that brought down TWA Flight 800 in 1996. The initiative, once dismissed as too expensive and impractical for the passenger fleet, could cost the industry at least $530 million over several years, the FAA said. FAA Administrator Marion Blakey said the FAA will propose a regulation later this year requiring the industry to install a fuel tank safety device on new planes made by Airbus and BOEING CO. and retrofit existing aircraft over a 7-year period. Regulations, however, can take years to finalize. The on-board device is designed to reduce the threat of combustion by neutralizing the potentially volatile fuel-air mixture in empty or emptying tanks. This is achieved by replacing oxygen with nitrogen-enriched air. (Reuters 12:24 PM ET 02/17/2004) Mo http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=925...024897a&s=rb04 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Larry Dighera" wrote in message .. . The wheels grind slowly (8 years later).... U.S. regulators said they plan to order modifications on 3,800 commercial airplanes to reduce chances of a fuel tank explosion like the one that brought down TWA Flight 800 in 1996. The initiative, once dismissed as too expensive and impractical for the passenger fleet, could cost the industry at least $530 million over several years, the FAA said. FAA Administrator Marion Blakey said the FAA will propose a regulation later this year requiring the industry to install a fuel tank safety device on new planes made by Airbus and BOEING CO. and retrofit existing aircraft over a 7-year period. Regulations, however, can take years to finalize. The on-board device is designed to reduce the threat of combustion by neutralizing the potentially volatile fuel-air mixture in empty or emptying tanks. This is achieved by replacing oxygen with nitrogen-enriched air. (Reuters 12:24 PM ET 02/17/2004) Mo http://q1.schwab.com/s/r?l=248&a=925...024897a&s=rb04 On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 12:29:25 GMT, "Mark S Conway" wrote in Message-Id: FUIYb.213502$U%5.1235945@attbi_s03: Like we believe it was a fuel tank explosion!!! Please..... Apparently Administrator Blakey believes it: A DECADE LATER, FAA MOVES ON EXPLODING FUEL TANKS The FAA is hoping to propose a rule this fall that would require airlines to install equipment to lessen the chance of in-flight fuel-tank explosions. FAA Administrator Marion Blakey announced the initiative Tuesday, saying the rule is being considered because new technology, largely developed by the agency itself, is now available to displace some of the oxygen within fuel tanks with inert nitrogen. "We're taking this step because we have found a practical solution," she told a news conference. The new, roughly $220,000-per-plane rule would be phased in over seven years starting in 2006, 10 years after the NTSB determined the belly tank of a TWA Boeing 747 (Flight 800) exploded off Long Island, killing 230 people. It was not the first or the last event of its kind. http://www.avweb.com/eletter/archive...ll.html#186748 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Replacing fuel cut-off valve with non-a/c part??? | Michael Horowitz | Owning | 46 | January 15th 05 10:20 PM |
Night bombers interception in Western Europe in 1944 | Bernardz | Military Aviation | 205 | July 22nd 04 05:31 PM |
Yo! Fuel Tank! | Veeduber | Home Built | 15 | October 25th 03 02:57 AM |
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump | Greg Reid | Home Built | 15 | October 7th 03 07:09 PM |
C210 fuel tank vents | Eric Brown | Owning | 2 | September 27th 03 02:59 AM |