![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Does anyone know the actual reason you're required to file a flight
plan when crossing the boarding between the U.S. and Canada? Does someone sit down at the end of the year and try to count operations based on them? They carry NO customs benefit since customs are handled separately. Usually, when we fly south into Mexico, we don't both filing since the U.S. has no way to actually hand the flight plan to Mexico. Most of the Mexico AOI don't even have working phones, much less computers. However, they are always happy to see you arrive at any time. Of course crossing the ADIZ northbound from Mexico is a different thing all together. -Robert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, (Robert M. Gary) said:
Does anyone know the actual reason you're required to file a flight plan when crossing the boarding between the U.S. and Canada? Does Because if you don't, they'll send a pair of F-16s out to check you out. And then, if they decide not to shoot you down, they send you a bill for the fuel the F-16s used. You don't want that. :-) -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ My family's values included "Always state your assumptions and your evidence", "first find out what the problem is, then fix it", and "feed your horse before yourself". But you don't see people legislating those... -- Zeebee |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Paul Tomblin) wrote in news:ccaeba$uvt$1
@allhats.xcski.com: In a previous article, (Robert M. Gary) said: Does anyone know the actual reason you're required to file a flight plan when crossing the boarding between the U.S. and Canada? Does Because if you don't, they'll send a pair of F-16s out to check you out. And then, if they decide not to shoot you down, they send you a bill for the fuel the F-16s used. You don't want that. :-) What happens if you overfly Canada, but not land? Do you need to file a flight plan for that too? Admittedly, the only times I have done that were under IFR, but I don't see why VFR aircraft would be any different. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, Andrew Sarangan said:
What happens if you overfly Canada, but not land? Do you need to file a flight plan for that too? Admittedly, the only times I have done that were under IFR, but I don't see why VFR aircraft would be any different. Yes, you do. It's even supposed to be helpful if you put "OVERFLIGHT" in the remarks section, don't know if that's true. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ We are not gentle tolerant people. We like drastically effective solutions. -- Steve VanDevender |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Paul Tomblin) wrote in
: In a previous article, Andrew Sarangan said: What happens if you overfly Canada, but not land? Do you need to file a flight plan for that too? Admittedly, the only times I have done that were under IFR, but I don't see why VFR aircraft would be any different. Yes, you do. It's even supposed to be helpful if you put "OVERFLIGHT" in the remarks section, don't know if that's true. I thought you only had to file if you were more than 25 miles in Canada? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote in message .158...
(Paul Tomblin) wrote in : I thought you only had to file if you were more than 25 miles in Canada? In addition, you also have to file anytime you cross a border. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Paul Tomblin) wrote in message ...
In a previous article, (Robert M. Gary) said: Does anyone know the actual reason you're required to file a flight plan when crossing the boarding between the U.S. and Canada? Does Because if you don't, they'll send a pair of F-16s out to check you out. And then, if they decide not to shoot you down, they send you a bill for the fuel the F-16s used. You don't want that. :-) That just doesn't make any sense though. If you are talking to ATC, they would just ask you what you are doing. Remember though, there is no ADIZ between Canada and the U.S. If you decide not to talk to ATC as you cross you wouldn't have a transponder code so they can't tell the difference between the planes that have filed and those that have not. They all just look like dots on the radar. How would they know the difference? When you cross the ADIZ (like from Mexico), you get your own code and everything, its very different. -Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Paul Tomblin) wrote in message ...
Since 9/11, aircraft crossing the border are required to be on a flight plan AND in communication with ATC, either VFR Flight Following or IFR. When flying across southern Ontario talking to Toronto Center, I was continually hearing Canadian pilots calling up near the border to get flight following across the border. That's in contrast to American pilots, who seem to get flight following the whole way there. I guess some parts of Canada are just too remote to get Flight Following from. I know that pilots somewhat regularly cross into the U.S. from Mexico without radios or transponders (since 9/11) but you have to prearrange the crossing location and exact time. The last time I was down in Mexico I ran into an airplane recovery guy who picks up wrecked airplanes and flys them back to the insurance co. Sometimes they end up as "green" airplanes (no radios). -Robert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since 9/11, aircraft crossing the border are required to be on a flight
plan AND in communication with ATC, either VFR Flight Following or IFR. When flying across southern Ontario talking to Toronto Center, I was continually hearing Canadian pilots calling up near the border to get flight following across the border. That's in contrast to American pilots, who seem to get flight following the whole way there. I know this to not be the case when entering the U.S. from Mexico but perhaps that's just because you have a transponder code. We usually are not talking to ATC when we cross back into the U.S. but we have a DVFR open. I was pretty happy with how easy the handoff was into Canada. When I entered Canada I was VFR. It wasn't really a handoff but I was allowed to keep my transponder code and the Canadian controller expected me (the U.S. controller said FF canceled, remain this code, contact Victoria). Southbound I was IFR (and IMC) and you couldn't tell the difference other than the use of the phrase "decimal" rather than "point" when giving freq's. Landing at Vancouver Int'l was really a piece of cake. The controllers were very friendly when I told them I didn't know any of the locations they were talking about (I never saw any "coal mines", etc on the charts). -robert |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
NAS and associated computer system | Newps | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | August 12th 04 05:12 AM |
us air force us air force academy us air force bases air force museum us us air force rank us air force reserve adfunk | Jehad Internet | Military Aviation | 0 | February 7th 04 04:24 AM |
WINGS: When do the clocks start ticking? | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 6 | February 3rd 04 03:01 PM |
IFR flight plan filing question | Tune2828 | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | July 23rd 03 03:33 AM |