A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bare Bones X-C



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 1st 04, 10:45 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Bare Bones X-C

On 31 Jul 2004 13:36:35 -0700, (SelwayKid) wrote:

Selway Kid (Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness)


Say hello to Roland Turney if you see him!

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:
(put Cubdriver in subject line)

The Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Expedition sailboat charters www.expeditionsail.com
  #2  
Old August 2nd 04, 09:16 AM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andrew Sarangan wrote
OK, let me slightly change what I said. If you can fly a 50 mile xc, you
should be able to fly a 2000 mile xc.


If you have forever to get there.

The real purpose is to make you navigate in an
unfamiliar area.


In the age of electronic nav (especially LORAN and GPS) navigation is
probably the least important part of XC training. Back in the old
days, when everyone navigated by map, compass, and stopwatch, what you
say was true. It no longer is. Navigation has become dramatically
easier in the past decade. Weather hasn't.

If the weather gets bad, land at the nearest airport.


If you land at the nearest airport the first time the weather is iffy,
you will NEVER complete that 2000 mile XC. Before that happens, your
charts will expire, your airplane will need service - you name it.
For a recreational pilot, what you say makes sense. For a private
pilot, whose privileges include flying in support of his business and
family vacations, it does not. You should be training him to a
proficiency level that allows him to exercise private pilot
privileges, not telling him to limit himself to recreational pilot
privileges. In other words, train for the privileges of the
certificate, not the requirements of the checkride.

The overall result is that safety has improved.


Sure. It has improved on a per-hour basis, because most private
pilots today don't go anywhere. While the recreational certificate
never really caught on, the reality is that most private pilots fly to
recreational privileges most of the time. It's hard to get hurt if
you never do anything.

As for an instrument rating - that's not a substitute for being able
to fly VFR in iffy weather but an addition to it. Iffy weather is
HARDER to handle when you are in the soup, not easier. Most IFR in
most of the country is associated with other ugly weather phenomena
most of the time.

You may have reasons to believe that the training standards
has degraded over the years, but the statistics clearly prove that we
are training much safer pilots today than we did in the past.


And of course safety is the most important thing. Once we have
stopped everyone from doing anything other than going up on blue sky
days to look at the pretty scenery, we will have a spectavular safety
record. In that sense - and ONLY in that sense - are we training
safer pilots. Of course the result is also there to see. People
conclude that flying is not useful - and if you approach it the way
you suggest, it's NOT. So long term pilot retention is way down. The
pilot population shrinks every year. One day, there will be none
left. Then we will have total safety.

Michael
  #3  
Old August 2nd 04, 09:21 AM
Michael
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

zatatime wrote
Isn't this still required? Not trying to nit pick, I was surprised to
see you say it isn't expected any longer, but I've not heard that
before. I don't remember if it was a reg, or just the culture that
required it. Anyone with a little more info?


It was the PTS. The PTS was changed several years ago, and not for
the better. Some of the more egregious damage has been undone (for
years, slow flight was done at 1.2 Vso rather than at the edge of
stall) but some remains.

Andrew Sarangan wrote
On-the-spot planning might be useful if
you fly for a living and your employer gives you 30 minutes to plan a
flight.


Did you forget about flying in support of your business? We are
discussing private pilot privileges, not recreational.

The only time you have a time crunch is if you are
running low on fuel


This is not even close to true. The most likely time you are in a
crunch is when the weather is going to crap around you.

A properly planned flight with a backup plan is
unlikely to run into that situation.


This is absolute nonsense. Weather is unpredictable. On a 2000 mile
trip, you WILL encounter weather you didn't expect, and you WILL need
to plan a way around it.

Michael
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Position and Hold at uncontrolled field dave Piloting 42 February 26th 04 01:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.