![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain (
$1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more accurate location info. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using GPS to navigate airplanes in the US is only incedental to its actual
purpose. Mike MU-2 "William W. Plummer" wrote in message news ![]() Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain ( $1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more accurate location info. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message link.net...
Using GPS to navigate airplanes in the US is only incedental to its actual purpose. Mike MU-2 Well, as we move towards GPS/WAAS as the "primary source" for aerial navigation the urgency of providing redundancy certainly increases. Right now there's talk about maintaining a skeleton network of VORs, or keeping the old LORAN chains going, but the idea of cellphone towers is kind of fascinating. Here you have a bunch of radio transmitters in highly-fixed geographical locations that squawk a bunch of info out into the ether (hmm, sounds like a GPS satellite to me), that are all maintained by private funds. Plus, you've got at least 4 completely-separate networks (AT&T, Verizon, Sprint, Nextel) going at any one point in time. No, they're not everywhere, but odds are that anywhere you have a good-sized airport, you have population, and that means you have towers. If you add precise timing and positional codes to the signal these towers send out, you could conceivably have a highly GPS-like system that provides some kind of backup. Reception up in the flight levels might suck but it ought to improve as you approach the ground, which is where you really need it anyway. And hell, if you wire it all up right, couldn't you have a sort of break-through that allows ATC to transmit and receive "phone calls" in case of a radio failure? Two redundancies for the price of one! And best of all, by piggybacking on an existing infrastructure, you save a boatload of money. OK, I'll admit that the difference between principle and practice in this sort of thing is the difference between being a member of the Angelina Jolie Fan Club and staying over at her place for breakfast. But that doesn't mean speculating still isn't fun... Best, -cwk. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"C Kingsbury" wrote in message
om... the idea of cellphone towers is kind of fascinating. Here you have a bunch of radio transmitters in highly-fixed geographical locations that squawk a bunch of info out into the ether (hmm, sounds like a GPS satellite to me), If you add precise timing and positional codes to the signal these towers send out, you could conceivably have a highly GPS-like system that provides some kind of backup. CDMA operates on precise timing. However, they usually get their precise timing from GPS receivers... Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "William W. Plummer" wrote in message news ![]() Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? No. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
And you would be satisfied if the GPS only worked where there is cell phone
coverage? "William W. Plummer" wrote in news ![]() $He1.339@attbi_s01: Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain ( $1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more accurate location info. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I get 30 miles out of town and my cell phone is toast...
BT "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 58... And you would be satisfied if the GPS only worked where there is cell phone coverage? "William W. Plummer" wrote in news ![]() $He1.339@attbi_s01: Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain ( $1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more accurate location info. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the west is still wild...
BT "BTIZ" wrote in message news:ly84d.106328 I get 30 miles out of town and my cell phone is toast... BT "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message 58... And you would be satisfied if the GPS only worked where there is cell phone coverage? "William W. Plummer" wrote in news ![]() $He1.339@attbi_s01: Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain ( $1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more accurate location info. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BTIZ" wrote in message news:ly84d.106328$yh.29283@fed1read05... I get 30 miles out of town and my cell phone is toast... ....on the ground. Get a few thousand feet of altitude on things and the coverage gets MUCH better. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We've already got something like that. It's called Loran.
Best, Steve Robertson "William W. Plummer" wrote: Satellites are great for coverage but they are expensive to maintain ( $1B per year). Would it be possible to use all those cell phone towers as GPS extensions, providing wide area coverage and increased accuracy? The satellite constellation would serve as the "backbone" which provides accurate time and position information to all those cell phone towers, but within range, the cell phone towers will provide much more accurate location info. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Ulm, MN (ULM) Airport Runway Extension Study | Dan Hoehn | General Aviation | 1 | May 5th 04 03:33 PM |
Arrow auto gear extension oddness | Roy Smith | Owning | 10 | March 8th 04 02:27 AM |
Backup for dropping the gear | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 42 | February 29th 04 10:22 AM |
leading edge flaps | Arquebus257WeaMag | Military Aviation | 105 | January 14th 04 04:11 AM |
Wanted clever PA32 engineer's thoughts - Gear extention problem on Piper Lance | [email protected] | Owning | 5 | July 22nd 03 12:35 AM |