![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Repeated from rec.aviation.owning because it's not necessarily only owners
who are interested in how their engines run.) Word was just getting around about a year ago that it is possible to run some carbureted engines lean of peak. It was discovered that using carb heat would improve the mixture distribution. I had a lot of time early in the year to look into this because our O320 H2AD was apart due to premature lifter failure. From what I could learn in this and other discussion groups, most engines like this would not run LOP or even close to peak without shaking. Once I was finished with the full rich break in operation of our rebuilt engine, I tried LOP operation and was surprised how well it worked. Carb heat helped slightly with the predictability of the onset of roughness and how lean the engine could be run with acceptable smoothness. Even with carb heat off however, the engine could be leaned until RPM dropped dramatically and it began to stumble and quit but the roughness would still be something you heard with your ears rather than felt in the airframe. I could understand how there was a lot of variation in mixture distribution among engine models and perhaps even individual engines but it was hard to reconcile the smoothness of ours with what I was hearing from other owners. Early in the spring, Walter Atkinson of Advanced Pilot Seminars, posted somewhere that any engine that was conforming and without induction leaks, ought to be able to run at the optimum (for a simple engine) 25 degree LOP spot. About a dozen pilots fly our plane and perhaps a quarter of them fly it the way I do now. About 180 hours since rebuild, the engine intermittently has stopped showing RPM rise when leaned for ground operations. Other indications support that this is almost certainly a minor induction leak. I finally caught it in a bad mood and was able to take it up to try it out in cruise. At 4500 feet, full rich EGT is 50 - 75 degrees hotter so it does look as if it is leaner. It starts to sound rough well before reaching peak. By peak it is objectionably rough and, anywhere past peak, you can feel the vibrations in the seat and see the glareshield dance. It was never this rough before, even leaned for 200 RPM drop and stumbling. I then turned the mixture back to about 150 degrees ROP. The engine was perfectly smooth. This is the way I used to fly it and the way I know many pilots fly these planes. If I didn't look for or ignored the lack of RPM rise in ground leaning, I could fly it this way for months or years without suspecting there was a problem. From this experience, I conclude that many or most engines out there actually have minor induction leaks. This might also be part of the reluctance of manufactures and shops to recommend LOP operation. LOP any minor air leakage in the numerous hoses and joints of the induction system will be a "problem" and something wrong with the engine. ROP, minor leaks are not an issue and do not reflect on either the builder or the repair shop. I want my engine to run right and I now add to the list of LOP advantages the fact that any problems with the engine will become apparent early. This is especially important to those of us who must fly without and engine analyzer. -- Roger Long |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Roger,
I then turned the mixture back to about 150 degrees ROP. The engine was perfectly smooth. This is the way I used to fly it and the way I know many pilots fly these planes. If I didn't look for or ignored the lack of RPM rise in ground leaning, I could fly it this way for months or years without suspecting there was a problem. From this experience, I conclude that many or most engines out there actually have minor induction leaks. This might also be part of the reluctance of manufactures and shops to recommend LOP operation. LOP any minor air leakage in the numerous hoses and joints of the induction system will be a "problem" and something wrong with the engine. ROP, minor leaks are not an issue and do not reflect on either the builder or the repair shop. Not until the engine suffers major damage due to one or more cylinders running not quite as rich and therefore hotter as the pilot thinks they do! Because this is what induction leaks and subsequent uneven mixture distribution does. If your engine starts to shake before even reaching peak EGT (mean), it can be concluded, that at least one cylinder is running significantly left of peak under these conditions. The same cylinder will, when operating the engine rich, be much closer to peak EGT than the overall mixture. (Lycoming would, based on findings of signs of overtemperature, probably blame the damage on lean operation, though...) I want my engine to run right and I now add to the list of LOP advantages the fact that any problems with the engine will become apparent early. good point! This is especially important to those of us who must fly without and engine analyzer. ...where you wouldn't notice high CHT on just one cylinder, exactly! regards, Friedrich -- for personal email please remove "entfernen" from my adress |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ROP masking of engine problems | Roger Long | Owning | 4 | September 27th 04 07:36 PM |
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I | Robert Clark | Military Aviation | 2 | May 26th 04 06:42 PM |
Rotax 582 engine problems | L. Darte | Home Built | 6 | May 9th 04 01:49 AM |
Emergency Procedures | RD | Piloting | 13 | April 11th 04 08:25 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |