![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eventually I plan to build a tube-n-fabric aircraft, but now isn't the time.
However, I would like to start developing the skills that I will need. I've been looking at kids playsets for our yard. Most of them are made from redwood, and are quite expensive. Several thousand dollars for the more complex ones. Pressure treated lumber is much cheaper, but I don't want my kids crawling on it. Today I got an idea. I could build a frame out of steel tubing, get it powdercoated, and then deck it with the composite synthetic decking that is becoming popular for backyard decks. Such a structure would be strong, durable, impervious to the elements, and would give me an excuse to learn to weld. What are the minimum set of tools I'd need to buy to complete the project? I know I'd need an OA torch. What tools would I need for the cutting, shaping, and prepping of the steel tubing? Any other suggestions on construction and materials, especially steel type? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Ed" wrote: Eventually I plan to build a tube-n-fabric aircraft, but now isn't the time. However, I would like to start developing the skills that I will need. I've been looking at kids playsets for our yard. Most of them are made from redwood, and are quite expensive. Several thousand dollars for the more complex ones. Pressure treated lumber is much cheaper, but I don't want my kids crawling on it. Today I got an idea. I could build a frame out of steel tubing, get it powdercoated, and then deck it with the composite synthetic decking that is becoming popular for backyard decks. Such a structure would be strong, durable, impervious to the elements, and would give me an excuse to learn to weld. What are the minimum set of tools I'd need to buy to complete the project? I know I'd need an OA torch. What tools would I need for the cutting, shaping, and prepping of the steel tubing? Any other suggestions on construction and materials, especially steel type? You could actually do it with nothing but a torch, hacksaw and file, but I would recommend some magnetic holding clamps, a good bench sander, etc. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed,
Your sure you want OA? Why not MIG or TIG for welding? I have access to all three and prefer to use MIG on steel (as its fast and you don't go through the gas bottles like OA) and TIG for every thing else. I use OA to remove bearings (ones I don't want to re-use) and other heating purposes like softening up loctited bolts. As far as other tools a HF Cut-off saw is on the top of my list for most used tools, as well as a grinding wheel to form the fish mouths on the tubing for most joints. See my engine link below to see how I used a MIG to make a engine mount for a Soob. I like your idea of using synthetic decking with a tube frame for a playset. I can't tell you how many dry-rotted playsets (Redwood and other wood construction) that I have seen here in Arizona. They all look fine until they break. Just my 2 cents. -- Bart D. Hull Tempe, Arizona Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/engine.html for my Subaru Engine Conversion Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/fuselage.html for Tango II I'm building. Remove -nospam to reply via email. Ed wrote: Eventually I plan to build a tube-n-fabric aircraft, but now isn't the time. However, I would like to start developing the skills that I will need. I've been looking at kids playsets for our yard. Most of them are made from redwood, and are quite expensive. Several thousand dollars for the more complex ones. Pressure treated lumber is much cheaper, but I don't want my kids crawling on it. Today I got an idea. I could build a frame out of steel tubing, get it powdercoated, and then deck it with the composite synthetic decking that is becoming popular for backyard decks. Such a structure would be strong, durable, impervious to the elements, and would give me an excuse to learn to weld. What are the minimum set of tools I'd need to buy to complete the project? I know I'd need an OA torch. What tools would I need for the cutting, shaping, and prepping of the steel tubing? Any other suggestions on construction and materials, especially steel type? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bart:
Was going OA mainly because it's cheap to buy a torch. I didn't want to spend $300 for a MIG just to build a kid's playset. I'm many years away from starting an aircraft. What kind of grinding wheel ... a benchtop grinder, or an air grinder? "Bart D. Hull" wrote in message ... Ed, Your sure you want OA? Why not MIG or TIG for welding? As far as other tools a HF Cut-off saw is on the top of my list for most used tools, as well as a grinding wheel to form the fish mouths on the tubing for most joints. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed,
A benchtop grinder is REALLY useful. Be sure to get a big one (8" wheels and 1+ HP. (See other threads for the HP rating junk.) I have a HF 1.5 HP bench grinder and it never bogs on grinding or polishing with 8" wheels. Throw away the original wheels and get Norton wheels of your favorite grit. Not only are they better balanced but they cut MUCH faster. I read about this on this list and am a believer after I tried it. I use the rol-loc wheels for grinding on a high speed air grinder. NICE but not a necessary as a good bench grinder. Bart -- Bart D. Hull Tempe, Arizona Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/engine.html for my Subaru Engine Conversion Check http://www.inficad.com/~bdhull/fuselage.html for Tango II I'm building. Remove -nospam to reply via email. Ed wrote: Bart: Was going OA mainly because it's cheap to buy a torch. I didn't want to spend $300 for a MIG just to build a kid's playset. I'm many years away from starting an aircraft. What kind of grinding wheel ... a benchtop grinder, or an air grinder? "Bart D. Hull" wrote in message ... Ed, Your sure you want OA? Why not MIG or TIG for welding? As far as other tools a HF Cut-off saw is on the top of my list for most used tools, as well as a grinding wheel to form the fish mouths on the tubing for most joints. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Bart D. Hull wrote:
Ed, Your sure you want OA? Why not MIG or TIG for welding? I have access to all three and prefer to use MIG on steel (as its fast and you don't go through the gas bottles like OA) and TIG for every thing else. I use OA to remove bearings (ones I don't want to re-use) and other heating purposes like softening up loctited bolts. A novice welder is far better off putting together his airplane using OA rather than TIG or MIG. A google search will reveal that this has been hashed out here many times in the past. Pay particular attention to posts made by a guy called Highflier. I'm using TIG on my project, but I am not a novice welder. No way would I use MIG for something I wanted to fly in some day. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Del Rawlins wrote:
In Bart D. Hull wrote: Ed, Your sure you want OA? Why not MIG or TIG for welding? I have access to all three and prefer to use MIG on steel (as its fast and you don't go through the gas bottles like OA) and TIG for every thing else. I use OA to remove bearings (ones I don't want to re-use) and other heating purposes like softening up loctited bolts. A novice welder is far better off putting together his airplane using OA rather than TIG or MIG. A google search will reveal that this has been hashed out here many times in the past. Pay particular attention to posts made by a guy called Highflier. I'm using TIG on my project, but I am not a novice welder. No way would I use MIG for something I wanted to fly in some day. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ Del, they say one way to judge another person's intelligence is by how well he agrees with you. I think you are bloody brilliant. (and by the way, thanks for teaching me some of what I think I know) I know I'm not an expert at it, and never will be, but I feel like I'm catching on enough to be dangerous. I built my whole shop with a Hobart 135 running cored wire. I like it! With the shielding gas, it gets even better since you can clearly see what's going down. But all my aircraft welding is done with O/A. I've tried the Mig on thin tube. Invariably my welds started off cold and wound up hot enough to cut holes. If I worked slowly enough to avoid burning the tube, the welds weren't sound. Grandpa said there is a proper tool for every job, and it's not always a hammer. For O/A welding, I've started wearing reading glasses under my goggles so I can really see what's going on. Boy, did that make a difference. I suspect a magnifier in the goggles would be better since I can't see squat for distance with the glasses on... I haven't tried a Cobalt Blue filter yet because of the cost, but I've been reading about it. Supposedly this will reduce the glow of the hot metal to the point where all you really see is the molten puddle. I'd like to try one before shelling out that much money. Has anyone tried one? Opinions? Richard |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Richard Lamb wrote:
Del, they say one way to judge another person's intelligence is by how well he agrees with you. I think you are bloody brilliant. (and by the way, thanks for teaching me some of what I think I know) Now I'm just frightened. You probably have me confused with somebody else. I haven't tried a Cobalt Blue filter yet because of the cost, but I've been reading about it. Supposedly this will reduce the glow of the hot metal to the point where all you really see is the molten puddle. I'd like to try one before shelling out that much money. Has anyone tried one? I've never tried one, but word on the Bearhawk list seems to suggest that the cobalt blue filters are -so- last century. The recommended item is the TM2000 lens available at http://www.tinmantech.com/html/ tm2000.html but man, the price! That sucker costs about as much as the fancy auto darkening lens for my TIG welding helmet, but if it works as well as they say it does it is probably worth it. I don't do enough OA work to justify the cost at this point. I tried to buy a cobalt blue filter at one of the local welding supply houses recently and the guy didn't think they were even manufactured anymore. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Del Rawlins wrote:
In Richard Lamb wrote: Del, they say one way to judge another person's intelligence is by how well he agrees with you. I think you are bloody brilliant. (and by the way, thanks for teaching me some of what I think I know) Now I'm just frightened. You probably have me confused with somebody else. I haven't tried a Cobalt Blue filter yet because of the cost, but I've been reading about it. Supposedly this will reduce the glow of the hot metal to the point where all you really see is the molten puddle. I'd like to try one before shelling out that much money. Has anyone tried one? I've never tried one, but word on the Bearhawk list seems to suggest that the cobalt blue filters are -so- last century. The recommended item is the TM2000 lens available at http://www.tinmantech.com/html/ tm2000.html but man, the price! That sucker costs about as much as the fancy auto darkening lens for my TIG welding helmet, but if it works as well as they say it does it is probably worth it. I don't do enough OA work to justify the cost at this point. I tried to buy a cobalt blue filter at one of the local welding supply houses recently and the guy didn't think they were even manufactured anymore. ---------------------------------------------------- Del Rawlins- Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email. Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website: http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/ Yep. That's the one. I confused with the cobolt blue flter. I've always been a sucker for a catchy name... Thanks, Richard |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 00:21:58 GMT, Richard Lamb
wrote: I haven't tried a Cobalt Blue filter yet because of the cost, but I've been reading about it. Supposedly this will reduce the glow of the hot metal to the point where all you really see is the molten puddle. I'd like to try one before shelling out that much money. Has anyone tried one? Opinions? Richard I just got the filter from Tinman. I bit the bullet and paid for it, rationalizing that it's my eys and they deserve the best protection I can get them. When I first tried using them, I was disappointed. Not because of the performance of the glasses and tint, but because of the goggles that you have to use with the plate. The goggles would be fine if I didn't have bifocal classes, the type that do not have a line demarking the distance from close up. They have a narrow focal point for closeup viewing and you really have to look out the bottom of the glasses. No problem normally, I've long since gotten used to doing that. But the goggles literally cut off that portion of the view. At least the face shield I was using allowed me my full range of viewing. I could tilt my head back and get the focus I needed. Plus the full face shield blocked the heat from the welding process and protected my face from spatter. With the MUCH smaller goggles, even though they protect my eyes, my face does not get any protection and I SURE noticed the heat from the weld, something that I'd been oblivious to when welding with a full face shield. As to the actual viewing of the puddle, honestly I did not notice an enormous difference or improvement. I was so busy shifting the goggles around and tipping them down so I could use the bottom portion of my glasses that I was a bit put off at first. Then I did my old trick of simply putting on a second pair of glasses over my regular glasses, a cheapo pair of X2 reading glasses I bought at a discount store. That worked fine, if a bit awkwardly. The goggles fit over both so it's no biggie. So they do work, but I wasn't having any problems seeing the puddle with my full face shield. I just thought that they'd REALLY make things different. They certainly aren't any worse, in terms of seeing the puddle, when I have both sets of glasses on and in fact Tinman sells a set of magnafiers that fit into the goggles, if you feel you want them. Will I continue using them? Of course, they offer the best eyeball protection from the flares I can buy. I'll put up with a little bit of annoyance for that protection. Corky Scott |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 2nd 04 11:41 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |