A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Did the PA-28-180....



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 21st 04, 01:18 AM
Casey Wilson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Did the PA-28-180....

.....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975?


  #2  
Old December 21st 04, 01:46 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article uRKxd.2426$2X6.28@trnddc07,
"Casey Wilson" wrote:

....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975?


Not from Piper.

--
Bob Noel
looking for a sig the lawyers will like
  #3  
Old December 21st 04, 04:13 AM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:18:18 GMT, "Casey Wilson"
wrote:

....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975?


No.

There are aftermarket conversions for the -A3A engines that have the
hollow crank shaft.

MT-Propellers has an STC for an electric (3-bladed?) CS prop.
  #4  
Old December 22nd 04, 05:46 AM
aluckyguess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How many knots would be gained with this?
"Nathan Young" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:18:18 GMT, "Casey Wilson"
wrote:

....have an option for a constant speed prop prior to 1975?


No.

There are aftermarket conversions for the -A3A engines that have the
hollow crank shaft.

MT-Propellers has an STC for an electric (3-bladed?) CS prop.



  #5  
Old December 23rd 04, 04:33 PM
Nathan Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:46:57 -0800, "aluckyguess" wrote:

How many knots would be gained with this?


The consensus is little top end would be gained, although a few
additional knots would be possible by allowing the engine to operate
at higher power at lower altitudes.

See this google thread for a discussion on fixed pitch vs. C/S.
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Y5531281A


  #6  
Old December 24th 04, 08:36 AM
Marty
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"aluckyguess" wrote in message
...
How many knots would be gained with this?



Hi Lucky,

Congrats on the license!

Think of a CS propeller as an overdrive. Simply, it's purpose is to lower
the fuel consumption by taking a bigger bite of air in cruise. You basically
get the same cruise speed for less rpms.

Properly used, a CS prop also helps to maximize engine life. Improper or
misuse of a CS prop can render even a new airplane to glider status
quickly,especially turbo equipped aircraft.

There are other benefits and caveats, you will learn them if you go for a
complex endorsement.

HTH,
Marty



  #7  
Old December 25th 04, 12:56 AM
aluckyguess
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Marty" wrote in message
...

"aluckyguess" wrote in message
...
How many knots would be gained with this?



Hi Lucky,

Congrats on the license!

Think of a CS propeller as an overdrive. Simply, it's purpose is to lower
the fuel consumption by taking a bigger bite of air in cruise. You
basically get the same cruise speed for less rpms.

Properly used, a CS prop also helps to maximize engine life. Improper or
misuse of a CS prop can render even a new airplane to glider status
quickly,especially turbo equipped aircraft.

There are other benefits and caveats, you will learn them if you go for a
complex endorsement.

HTH,
Marty


Thanks


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.