![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() In the USA, the FAA has a voluntary standard for model aircraft that limits operation to 400 feet AGL. http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/1acfc3f689769a56862569e70077c9cc/$FILE/ATTBJMAC/ac91-57.pdf The new legislation for UAVs picks up that 400 AGL limit as I recall. That said, there are pirates flying quadcopters much higher (7000 meters?). Search Youtube for 'quadcopter altitude record'. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is also guidance for flying "RC aircraft" as a hobbiest within 3 miles of an airport. It can be done with proper precautions.
Can you see the RC or quad copter from 6000 to 8000 ft away safely to operate it? BillT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 27, 2014 3:32:49 PM UTC-7, son_of_flubber wrote:
In the USA, the FAA has a voluntary standard for model aircraft that limits operation to 400 feet AGL. http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/1acfc3f689769a56862569e70077c9cc/$FILE/ATTBJMAC/ac91-57.pdf The new legislation for UAVs picks up that 400 AGL limit as I recall. That said, there are pirates flying quadcopters much higher (7000 meters?). Search Youtube for 'quadcopter altitude record'. Actually the FAA has no specific height limit for model aircraft. The Academy of Model Aeronautics (governing and insuring body for model competitions) has a safety rule that limits altitude to 400 feet within 2 miles of an airport, but allows other altitudes elsewhere and also with permission of the airport operator. Many of the model sailplanes are operating at altitudes above 3000 AGL when participating in XC contests, they are required to have a specific observer looking for full-sized aircraft to avoid collision. If a model is being flow outside of a contest, and not by a member of the AMA, then all bets are off! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, April 27, 2014 7:23:16 PM UTC-4, SoaringXCellence wrote:
Actually the FAA has no specific height limit for model aircraft. That said, the FAA does advise in ac91-57: "Do not fly model aircraft higher than 400 feet above the surface." http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/1acfc3f689769a56862569e70077c9cc/$FILE/ATTBJMAC/ac91-57.pdf |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Using the argument that they are not aircraft and that they are therefore NOT under FAA jurisdiction, some UAV operators are asserting their rights to fly their aircraft in Class B airspace.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngogl...ne-pilot-case/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
son_of_flubber wrote, On 5/3/2014 5:33 PM:
Using the argument that they are not aircraft and that they are therefore NOT under FAA jurisdiction, some UAV operators are asserting their rights to fly their aircraft in Class B airspace. http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngogl...ne-pilot-case/ I did not see anything in the article related to Class B airspace. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to email me) - "A Guide to Self-Launching Sailplane Operation" https://sites.google.com/site/motorg...ad-the-guide-1 - "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 2:33:05 AM UTC+2, son_of_flubber wrote:
Using the argument that they are not aircraft and that they are therefore NOT under FAA jurisdiction, some UAV operators are asserting their rights to fly their aircraft in Class B airspace. http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngogl...ne-pilot-case/ Hmmm .... a drone in class B airspace? Wait until one of them gets sucked through an engine or leaves a long lasting impression in the nose of a jet. I am always shocked by what stupid things people do just because they can and because there are no rules saying you can't do it. The same bunch of guys then cries wolf for 'government over-reach' or 'over-regulation', if everything gets regulated. Common sense seems to have vanished! GM |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, May 4, 2014 12:09:01 AM UTC-4, Eric Greenwell wrote:
I did not see anything in the article related to Class B airspace. Right, I posted that particular article because it seemed of marginally better quality than this more highly editorialized article that mentions Class B http://motherboard.vice.com/read/the...ies-is-a-crime The Class B in question is the surface to 10000 AGL bottom layer of the upside down layer cake. Here is another case that is trying to stretch existing regulations to cover UAVs. Of note is the 'You're not my boss, so don't tell me what to do.' rabble-rousing tone that reflects poorly on the UAV community. http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorym...on-their-side/ The UAV hobbyists communities are in general doing some really exciting things http://www.meetup.com/DC-Area-Drone-User-Group/ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
While I agree that common sense is definitely on the decline, common sense
would eliminate the upsidedown wedding cake and regulate only the arrival and departure routes. What mad man actually believes that all of the airspace in a Class B area is actually required for safe airline operation? Stupidity is in the eye of the beholder and not necessarily fact. Tell the airshow pilot that an inverted, low level ribbon cut is "stupid". I'm only arguing for intelligent regulation of airspace in place of the standard 30 nm around a busy airport. And, yes, I don't think it's wise to poke the bear by violating the rules of "good sense". "GM" wrote in message ... On Sunday, May 4, 2014 2:33:05 AM UTC+2, son_of_flubber wrote: Using the argument that they are not aircraft and that they are therefore NOT under FAA jurisdiction, some UAV operators are asserting their rights to fly their aircraft in Class B airspace. http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngogl...ne-pilot-case/ Hmmm .... a drone in class B airspace? Wait until one of them gets sucked through an engine or leaves a long lasting impression in the nose of a jet. I am always shocked by what stupid things people do just because they can and because there are no rules saying you can't do it. The same bunch of guys then cries wolf for 'government over-reach' or 'over-regulation', if everything gets regulated. Common sense seems to have vanished! GM |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Today at Oshkosh [20/34] - "19 One last look at the bes-sounding planes in the show.jpg" yEnc (1/1) | Just Plane Noise | Aviation Photos | 1 | July 25th 07 08:22 AM |
sounding software | medirect | Soaring | 1 | August 12th 06 12:08 AM |
What's the best sounding aircraft you ever heard? | DeltaDeltaDelta | Piloting | 75 | December 6th 03 03:46 AM |