![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() The discussion about cutting power on final reminded me of something I've been puzzled about for some time now. If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? Or have I missed something? What should you do if you lose your engine just after turning base to final? rg |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ron Garret"
If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? Unless you do every landing power off with room to spare, yes. Or, aim for the mid point of a 2500' plus field. There are ways to do it. But, almost nobody does. Base turn should be doable power off in most cases in a 172 or similar glider. Or have I missed something? What should you do if you lose your engine just after turning base to final? Land short. That's why the slow idle check during the run-up is important. moo |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:56:22 -0800, Ron Garret
wrote: If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? Yes, that's true, and it's why the Old Timers taught power-off landings, and it's why I fly them routinely. (To tell the truth, I also like the feeling of whooshing down without that engine blatting away. Perhaps I was a glider pilot in another life.) -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Ron Garret posted:
The discussion about cutting power on final reminded me of something I've been puzzled about for some time now. If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? Or have I missed something? What should you do if you lose your engine just after turning base to final? As I was taught, the point of flying safely is to always have a viable option. So, I fly tight patterns and make power-off landings as a rule. If I make it to the pattern, I can make it to a runway, engine or no. Neil |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:41:39 GMT, "Neil Gould"
wrote in :: As I was taught, the point of flying safely is to always have a viable option. So, I fly tight patterns and make power-off landings as a rule. If I make it to the pattern, I can make it to a runway, engine or no. Truly? So when you're #5 in the pattern (which necessitates a looooong, extended downwind leg) you just fly the pattern at 2,000' then? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:56:22 -0800, Ron Garret
wrote: The discussion about cutting power on final reminded me of something I've been puzzled about for some time now. If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? Or have I missed something? What should you do if you lose your engine just after turning base to final? rg Can anyone cite an instance when a pilot lost his engine while on final and landed short because of it? Thanks, Corky Scott |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people
do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? ************************************************** *********************** Worse than that, is that I have noticed that many pilots seem to take off using power... That guarantees that they absolutely will land short if they lose power... What should we all do about that? Denny jeez |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:41:39 GMT, "Neil Gould" wrote in :: As I was taught, the point of flying safely is to always have a viable option. So, I fly tight patterns and make power-off landings as a rule. If I make it to the pattern, I can make it to a runway, engine or no. Truly? So when you're #5 in the pattern (which necessitates a looooong, extended downwind leg) you just fly the pattern at 2,000' then? Noting you can do about requested extended downwind leg. But you could keep your decent low or delay the decent to give you more reach. Also consider a flapless landing to keep the glide angle shallow. Wait to add flaps when you are certain to make the runway. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
neil wrote:
As I was taught, the point of flying safely is to always have a viable option. So, I fly tight patterns and make power-off landings as a rule. If I make it to the pattern, I can make it to a runway, engine or no. Larry Dighera wrote: Truly? So when you're #5 in the pattern (which necessitates a looooong, extended downwind leg) you just fly the pattern at 2,000' then? I was about to ask that, too. Depending on the airport, it would be tricky to make power-off approaches from the downwind *as a rule*. Not only is there the situation Larry mentioned above (3rd, 4th or 5th behind who-knows-what), but also airports with two runways that are staggered by 1500' or so and ATCs frequently instructing you to switch runways at the last minute. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what do you do when you are on 1/4-mile final and you spot a coyote
or two playing around in the middle of the runway? This has happened to me repeatedly in Santa Fe and just serves to remind me that I want some backup power just in case the landing isn't assured. Perhaps you don't see this where you fly "routinely" but it could always be something else. I typically pull the throttle all the way back to idle about 1/4 mile out, Cessna 172. -david -- David Gunter Santa Fe, NM In Cub Driver wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:56:22 -0800, Ron Garret wrote: If you fly final with some amount of power (which I gather most people do -- I always have) that seems to guarantee that if you lose your engine on final you will land short, and there's pretty much nothing you can do about it. Is that true? Yes, that's true, and it's why the Old Timers taught power-off landings, and it's why I fly them routinely. (To tell the truth, I also like the feeling of whooshing down without that engine blatting away. Perhaps I was a glider pilot in another life.) -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Cleared Straight-In Runway X; Report Y Miles Final" | Jim Cummiskey | Piloting | 86 | August 16th 04 06:23 PM |
Diesel engine | Bryan | Home Built | 41 | May 1st 04 07:23 PM |
Night engine failure in Boston | Dan Luke | Piloting | 8 | February 13th 04 05:33 AM |
Real stats on engine failures? | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 127 | December 8th 03 04:09 PM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |