![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Check this out:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0427054317.htm Interesting stuff... I wonder if aviation homebuilders could benefit from 2-stroke engines made with this stuff? Comments? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sanman wrote:
Check this out: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0427054317.htm Interesting stuff... I wonder if aviation homebuilders could benefit from 2-stroke engines made with this stuff? Comments? Nope. NASA (a government agency) has a patent on it. It won't be any use to us until Lycoming or Rotax start making "campaign contributions" -- http://www.ernest.isa-geek.org/ "Ignorance is mankinds normal state, alleviated by information and experience." Veeduber |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No Rotax (Bombardier) working with NASA is what the article is about.
Often times this technology is developed in the good 'ole USA on tax dollars and given away to the world for the "good of mankind" and the bottom line of corporations throughout the world. Ernest Christley wrote in message .com... sanman wrote: Check this out: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0427054317.htm Interesting stuff... I wonder if aviation homebuilders could benefit from 2-stroke engines made with this stuff? Comments? Nope. NASA (a government agency) has a patent on it. It won't be any use to us until Lycoming or Rotax start making "campaign contributions" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ernest Christley wrote in message .com...
sanman wrote: Check this out: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0427054317.htm Interesting stuff... I wonder if aviation homebuilders could benefit from 2-stroke engines made with this stuff? Comments? Nope. NASA (a government agency) has a patent on it. Are you sure? I didn't see that stated in the article--aside from which why would NASA NOT license manufacturers to use the alloy? It won't be any use to us until Lycoming or Rotax start making "campaign contributions" I thought Rotax was a division of Bombardier Recreational Products, who, according to the article, are already making engines with the new alloy. -- FF |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
epoxy aircraft seats? | Lpmcatee356 | Home Built | 26 | December 3rd 03 11:16 PM |