crap FS2004

one needs a state of the art ultra high end gaming machine to run this
FS2004 PALES in comparison to FS2000 thats right FS2000
Save your money

"Nick Name" wrote in message
...
one needs a state of the art ultra high end gaming machine to run this
FS2004 PALES in comparison to FS2000 thats right FS2000
Save your money


Disagree. I haven't upgraded my system since I first bought FS2002, when it
first came out.

FS2004 runs slightly faster and with slightly more eye candy than I had with
2002.

My system:

W2k pro (all updates/patches)
DirectX 9
Dual PIII 933
512mb RAM
GeForce 2 MX400

Clive

"Nick Name" wrote in message
...
one needs a state of the art ultra high end gaming machine to run this
FS2004 PALES in comparison to FS2000 thats right FS2000
Save your money

Total rubbish!

What one needs, is to know how to set your BIOS settings and choose your
hardware combo's.
I have an Athlon 2000+ (1.67Ghz IIRC)
512MB of cheap DDR RAM
nForce MB chipset
GeForce Ti4200

And guess what, I run FS2004 at 1024x768x32 with FULL detail on everything.
It even manages 4X anti-aliasing if there's not too much to draw.

So, FS2004 doesn't require monster hardware, it requires you to know how to
optimise your existing hardware to it's best. But go and waste money and a
brand new machine if you want.

BTW - Absolutely nothing in this machine is overclocked.

Regards,

Nathan

treefroginometry wrote in message
...
"Nick Name" wrote in message
...
one needs a state of the art ultra high end gaming machine to run this
FS2004 PALES in comparison to FS2000 thats right FS2000
Save your money

Total rubbish!
Thats right FS2004 total crap performance wise.
rotten code.
what ELSE is out of whack besides the bridges?
By the way the scenery away from major cities is still fs2000/2002.
The lear jet panel is untouched from 2002
Simple over looked **** like this gets me.
The 2D lear panel should be photorealistic by now ect.

"Nick Name" wrote

By the way the scenery away from major cities is still fs2000/2002.

Really? It still isn't good as 1977 Flight Unlimited III (for eastern CA).

The lear jet panel is untouched from 2002

The Learjet panel isn't good as Flight Unlimited III?

Jack Straight wrote
"Nick Name" wrote

By the way the scenery away from major cities is still fs2000/2002.

Really? It still isn't good as 1977 Flight Unlimited III (for eastern
CA).

Sorry, I meant "western..."

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 Jack Straight wrote:

Jack Straight wrote
"Nick Name" wrote

By the way the scenery away from major cities is still fs2000/2002.

Really? It still isn't good as 1977 Flight Unlimited III (for eastern
CA).

Sorry, I meant "western..."

I'm fairly sure you meant 1997 as well

--
Kev
__________________________________________________ ________________________
"My mother always made it clear to my sister and me that men and women
were equal -- if not more so." Al Gore