LX Nav: Clear Nav, or LX Navigation, which one

Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the above flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase one, which one would you buy and why?

On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:36:10 AM UTC-5, wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the above flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase one, which one would you buy and why?

Feature sets (at least the ones you will use) are all fairly compatible. The most important thing is what others near you are using so you'll be able to get help with setup and use.

2C

Le mardi 3 mars 2015 08:22:02 UTC-5, Kevin Christner a écrit*:
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:36:10 AM UTC-5, wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the above flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase one, which one would you buy and why?

Feature sets (at least the ones you will use) are all fairly compatible. The most important thing is what others near you are using so you'll be able to get help with setup and use.

2C

Hi

I was with Lx navigation, LX 5-7000, for 10 years very good product and support.
I upgraded to Clearnav this winter. I have not flown yet so I do not know
about quality and support. I think the output will be the same
I bought Clearnav because it is in north america and the other in far away
Slovenia from Montreal. Will see if this is a smart thinking.

I can't address the ClearNav computer/display, but I have their XC vario
and it's outstanding. Their customer support is, in my opinion, second
to none.

On 3/3/2015 7:07 AM, s6 wrote:
Le mardi 3 mars 2015 08:22:02 UTC-5, Kevin Christner a écrit :
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:36:10 AM UTC-5, wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the above flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase one, which one would you buy and why?
Feature sets (at least the ones you will use) are all fairly compatible. The most important thing is what others near you are using so you'll be able to get help with setup and use.

2C
Hi

I was with Lx navigation, LX 5-7000, for 10 years very good product and support.
I upgraded to Clearnav this winter. I have not flown yet so I do not know
about quality and support. I think the output will be the same
I bought Clearnav because it is in north america and the other in far away
Slovenia from Montreal. Will see if this is a smart thinking.



--
Dan Marotta

On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:36:10 AM UTC-5, wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the above flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase one, which one would you buy and why?

I've been using CN and CNv for five years, and both fully live up to advertizing. Factory support is excellent. The only thing I'd do differently is that I'd NOT have a tunnel mount. It looks snazzy, but it's too far away for these aging eyes. In fact, I think I'd do a pedistal mount for ease of access. From time to time you will want to send it back to the factory for some sort of update, and a pedistal mount will be much easier to remove than digging it out of the bowels of the instrument panel.

As Kevin says, the feature sets are pretty compatible. One significant
difference is the usability, the Clearnav can be mastered in a few minutes

using the 4 page mostly pictorial reference guide, rather than a 68 page
manual.

The matching CNv vario system is equally usable, and an outstanding
multi-sensor vario.

Software updates are easily installed from web downloads; there have
been 2 factory hardware update in 6 years, the original optional upgrade
from 1/4 VGA to full VGA, and now the high speed processor plus even
higher brightness/lower power display.


At 18:20 03 March 2015, wrote:
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:36:10 AM UTC-5,
wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the
abo=
ve flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase
on=
e, which one would you buy and why?

I've been using CN and CNv for five years, and both fully live up to
advert=
izing. Factory support is excellent. The only thing I'd do differently
is=
that I'd NOT have a tunnel mount. It looks snazzy, but it's too far
away
=
for these aging eyes. In fact, I think I'd do a pedistal mount for ease
of=
access. From time to time you will want to send it back to the factory
fo=
r some sort of update, and a pedistal mount will be much easier to
remove
t=
han digging it out of the bowels of the instrument panel.

On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 2:15:10 PM UTC-5, pete purdie wrote:
As Kevin says, the feature sets are pretty compatible. One significant
difference is the usability, the Clearnav can be mastered in a few minutes

using the 4 page mostly pictorial reference guide, rather than a 68 page
manual.

The matching CNv vario system is equally usable, and an outstanding
multi-sensor vario.

Software updates are easily installed from web downloads; there have
been 2 factory hardware update in 6 years, the original optional upgrade
from 1/4 VGA to full VGA, and now the high speed processor plus even
higher brightness/lower power display.


At 18:20 03 March 2015, wrote:
On Tuesday, March 3, 2015 at 3:36:10 AM UTC-5,
wrote:
Just wondering if anyone can add to a discussion as to why any of the
abo=
ve flight computers are better than the others. If you were to purchase
on=
e, which one would you buy and why?

I've been using CN and CNv for five years, and both fully live up to
advert=
izing. Factory support is excellent. The only thing I'd do differently
is=
that I'd NOT have a tunnel mount. It looks snazzy, but it's too far
away
=
for these aging eyes. In fact, I think I'd do a pedistal mount for ease
of=
access. From time to time you will want to send it back to the factory
fo=
r some sort of update, and a pedistal mount will be much easier to
remove
t=
han digging it out of the bowels of the instrument panel.


The feature set of LX9000 is years ahead of ClearNav. I used to fly with ClearNav and I switched to LX9000. I would never switch back to ClearNav for many reasons, the feature set being the most important. I got tired of waiting for simple changes. Anyone who wants to know more about LX9000 please download the LX Styler and play with it to see the power of LX9000. You can make it as complicated as you like or as simple as you like. It is a very flexible platform.

The variometers are very similar in terms of performance. I flew with both of them concurrently.

Credits to ClearNav; extremely good support probably the best out of all manufacturers. The area task optimizer is quite good as well.

I looked seriously at LX Navigation computers before buying the LX9000 but a couple of years ago they had many problems. Their variometer was just upgraded and there is no real experience with it yet. On the other hand LX Navigation will work with CNv and C302 which is awesome. Kudos to LX Navigation for not trying to lock a user to one type of variometer. Their computer is also very configurable so maybe worth looking at.

I have to disagree with Pete Purdie on this one. I found the ClearNav interface difficult to understand and work with. The LX interface on the other hand, I find quite intuitive.

It comes down to what you like and know. I have flown with LX instruments since 1999 and know them well.

I liken the ClearNav / LX debate the same as the Apple / PC debate. Some like one, some like the other. I like PC and I find LX like more like PC. Apple confuses me and so does ClearNav.

I have to disagree with Pete Purdie on this one. I found the ClearNav interface difficult to understand and work with. The LX interface on the other hand, I find quite intuitive.

It comes down to what you like and know. I have flown with LX instruments since 1999 and know them well.

I liken the ClearNav / LX debate the same as the Apple / PC debate. Some like one, some like the other. I like PC and I find LX more like PC. Apple confuses me and so does ClearNav.

I think most of us argue for what we have. I have an LX 9000 and find it superb. I like to choose what I look at and so appreciated being able to choose my setup on LX Styler. The software has been around the longest of the three so was the most complete and reliable when I got it, and it is the computer of choice at my club (in the various sizes). In my experience the company has been immediately responsive on the couple of occasions I have contacted them by email.