![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:41:12 GMT, simpilottt wrote:
I really want to try to run flight simulator 2004 (already have x-plane). I have two computers, but I need to know if the simulator will run acceptably (20-30 frames per second) on the following systems. Thanks ! 1. What's the result (quality) of using Microsoft Flight Simulator on an Apple Powerbook G4 1 gz with 700+ram on OS 10.3.3 using Virtual PC? I have no idea on this, although any emulated environment will be slow IMHO - I'd be surprised if it ran at any acceptable speed... 2. How well does Microsoft Flight Simulator run on a Pentium III 500 mhz PC with 128 ram? I'd say you can pretty much forget running FS9 on this config. I have an Athlon XP 2400+, overclocked to 2.2GHz, 1Gb RAM & a Geforce FX5900 & still don't get 20-30fps *consistently* with details turned up high. Please reply to this newsgroup, I cannot use my email address for non- work related stuff. Thanks X-Plane just doesn't have the same levels of detail, so doesn't need such a high-spec PC. -- Adam (Remove ".N*0*S*P*A*M" from email to reply!)... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The apple will get maybe 10 fps with things set medium high when cruising,
dropping to 5 - 8 in busier places. Angus "Adam Jackson" wrote in message . .. On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 15:41:12 GMT, simpilottt wrote: I really want to try to run flight simulator 2004 (already have x-plane). I have two computers, but I need to know if the simulator will run acceptably (20-30 frames per second) on the following systems. Thanks ! 1. What's the result (quality) of using Microsoft Flight Simulator on an Apple Powerbook G4 1 gz with 700+ram on OS 10.3.3 using Virtual PC? I have no idea on this, although any emulated environment will be slow IMHO - I'd be surprised if it ran at any acceptable speed... 2. How well does Microsoft Flight Simulator run on a Pentium III 500 mhz PC with 128 ram? I'd say you can pretty much forget running FS9 on this config. I have an Athlon XP 2400+, overclocked to 2.2GHz, 1Gb RAM & a Geforce FX5900 & still don't get 20-30fps *consistently* with details turned up high. Please reply to this newsgroup, I cannot use my email address for non- work related stuff. Thanks X-Plane just doesn't have the same levels of detail, so doesn't need such a high-spec PC. -- Adam (Remove ".N*0*S*P*A*M" from email to reply!)... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
simpilottt wrote
I really want to try to run flight simulator 2004 (already have x-plane). I have two computers, but I need to know if the simulator will run acceptably (20-30 frames per second) on the following systems. Thanks ! 1. What's the result (quality) of using Microsoft Flight Simulator on an Apple Powerbook G4 1 gz with 700+ram on OS 10.3.3 using Virtual PC? 2. How well does Microsoft Flight Simulator run on a Pentium III 500 mhz PC with 128 ram? I get 20-30 frames per second on this (800x600, all sliders maxed but no generated/fake scenery and no glare/lens/special effects, and default weather settings). ....Athlon XP 2400+ (2 GHz) CPU ....512 MB, 133 MHz RAM ....GeForce3 video which is faster than low end GeForce4 Except in cities where it might fall to 15 FPS. Please reply to this newsgroup, I cannot use my email address for non- work related stuff. Thanks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS2004/FS9, Set location to non-airport? | Squirrel | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 24th 04 12:43 AM |
FS2004/FS9 and ATI Radeon 9800 Pro | [email protected] | Simulators | 3 | October 18th 03 07:07 PM |