![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() This post is about rules intended to enhance safety. It is not about tasking or scoring or the philosophy of selecting a winner. "Safety rules" can be divided into two categories: 1. Rules that enhance the safety of everyone (e.g. the left-hand circling rule) 2. Rules that are targeted (primarily) toward new competitors. Experienced pilots tend to appreciate the first kind of rule, but not the second. You don't get to be an experienced pilot by disregarding safety issues. When a new rule of the second type is proposed, the response is predictable. New competitors support the rule because it removes their temptation to take new risks. Experienced pilots oppose the rule because it adds complication without any benefit. When a survey is taken, the opinion of the new competitors wins, simply because they are in the majority. There is a strong temptation to adopt rules of the second type, not only because of majority opinion, but also because it is difficult to argue against safety. As these rules get adopted, the experienced pilots (the contenders in any competition) become less and less happy. When the contenders are unhappy and begin to drop out, the entire sport suffers. The Rules Committee should be very, very careful about adopting safety rules of the second type. Even if the majority opinion supports them. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Pat Russell" wrote in message
... ................ When a new rule of the second type is proposed, the response is predictable. New competitors support the rule because it removes their temptation to take new risks. ................... I would think that the "temptation to take risks" would be removed through training and judgement not one individual's interpretation of some rule. Duane |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Duane said:
I would think that the "temptation to take risks" would be removed through training and judgement not one individual's interpretation of some rule. I don't think it works this way. Training and judgement determine how we behave in the face of temptation. The only way to remove a temptation is to change a rule. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom and Mike,
Check out the MASA ops manual, available on our web site. http://www.m-asa.org Cheers, OC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 15 | September 25th 03 01:13 PM |
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? | Jim | Piloting | 10 | August 13th 03 08:51 PM |