![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Australia is moving to the US airspace management model. This, on the
face of it, looks to be a good thing. Could any current US pilots who are up on this please let us know if you have a transponder veil within 40nm of a Class D tower in Class E airspace? Thanks. Mike Borgelt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Borgelt wrote:
Australia is moving to the US airspace management model. This, on the face of it, looks to be a good thing. Could any current US pilots who are up on this please let us know if you have a transponder veil within 40nm of a Class D tower in Class E airspace? Not that I know of. 30 nm mode C veils are used around Class B airports. There are apparently a few designated Class C and D airports that have a 10 nm (or larger) mode C veil, but I've never encountered one. In any case, gliders and other aircraft without engine driven electrical systems are not required to have Mode C reporting capability within veils (but outside of B, C airspace), or from 10000 feet to the floor of Class A airspace. Marc |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the glider and other exemptions for Mode C within the 30nm veil around
ClassB airspace is only for "Below the ceiling of ClassB or 10,000MSL which ever is LOWER", Las Vegas is one of the very few ClassB areas that stops at 9,000MSL. There is no exemption for between 9,000-10,000MSL in the 30nm veil at Las Vegas. BT "Marc Ramsey" wrote in message ... Mike Borgelt wrote: Australia is moving to the US airspace management model. This, on the face of it, looks to be a good thing. Could any current US pilots who are up on this please let us know if you have a transponder veil within 40nm of a Class D tower in Class E airspace? Not that I know of. 30 nm mode C veils are used around Class B airports. There are apparently a few designated Class C and D airports that have a 10 nm (or larger) mode C veil, but I've never encountered one. In any case, gliders and other aircraft without engine driven electrical systems are not required to have Mode C reporting capability within veils (but outside of B, C airspace), or from 10000 feet to the floor of Class A airspace. Marc |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 20:20:26 -0700, "BTIZ"
wrote: the glider and other exemptions for Mode C within the 30nm veil around ClassB airspace is only for "Below the ceiling of ClassB or 10,000MSL which ever is LOWER", Las Vegas is one of the very few ClassB areas that stops at 9,000MSL. There is no exemption for between 9,000-10,000MSL in the 30nm veil at Las Vegas. BT "Marc Ramsey" wrote in message m... Mike Borgelt wrote: Australia is moving to the US airspace management model. This, on the face of it, looks to be a good thing. Could any current US pilots who are up on this please let us know if you have a transponder veil within 40nm of a Class D tower in Class E airspace? Not that I know of. 30 nm mode C veils are used around Class B airports. There are apparently a few designated Class C and D airports that have a 10 nm (or larger) mode C veil, but I've never encountered one. In any case, gliders and other aircraft without engine driven electrical systems are not required to have Mode C reporting capability within veils (but outside of B, C airspace), or from 10000 feet to the floor of Class A airspace. Marc Thanks guys. I'll ask the guy in charge of the airspace reform to comment. While we are at it does anyone fly near a US Army helicopter training operation? Is the airspace usd for training a Restricted area while active. Or just an MOA? Can you fly through it VFR without a clearance? Thanks Mike Borgelt |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Must the PLANE be IFR-equipped to fly over17,500? | john smith | Home Built | 11 | August 27th 04 02:29 AM |
Two airspace classes for one airspace? (KOQU) | John R | Piloting | 8 | June 30th 04 04:46 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Violating Airspace with GPS | John Bell | Piloting | 57 | November 5th 03 08:25 PM |