![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My wife and I have recently acquired a 1-26B with a
Ball 400/6 (not a new installation). It is plumbed parallel with a Winter mech. (and T.E. probe). Since we acquired it, the Ball indicates climb pretty much at all times, and no amount of adjustment (red knob on back), setting selections, etc. have made a difference. The Winter works fine, and I can identify no problems with the flask or plumbing. I note there are 2 potentiometers pigtailed off the back of the instrument, but I have no paperwork or manual of any kind on it. I was wondering if anyone knew where I could send it for overhaul, and better yet, if anyone has data or ideas I could use first to more completely troubleshoot/adjust it in the field. Short of that my next step would be to find someone with a hole in their panel to take it up in their ship for a test hop... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Anthony Turiano" m wrote in message ... My wife and I have recently acquired a 1-26B with a Ball 400/6 (not a new installation). It is plumbed parallel with a Winter mech. (and T.E. probe). Since we acquired it, the Ball indicates climb pretty much at all times, and no amount of adjustment (red knob on back), setting selections, etc. have made a difference. The Winter works fine, and I can identify no problems with the flask or plumbing. I note there are 2 potentiometers pigtailed off the back of the instrument, but I have no paperwork or manual of any kind on it. I was wondering if anyone knew where I could send it for overhaul, and better yet, if anyone has data or ideas I could use first to more completely troubleshoot/adjust it in the field. Short of that my next step would be to find someone with a hole in their panel to take it up in their ship for a test hop... Blue Sky Avionics LLC apparently bought Ball. They have a website at http://www.ballvarios.com/ I was not successful in getting my Graphics Comp vario repaired by them, though. Tim Ward |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When a vario indicates climb all the time, and is on a TE tube, the cause is
usually a leak between the vario and the capacity (or sometimes at the glass of the vario face). The TE tube makes suction all the time. If there is any leak downstream of the vario it will mimic lift (when you climb, air flows out of the capacity through the vario). This is true of any vario that uses a TE tube and a flask. -Bob Korves 5H DuoDiscus 5K LAK-17a "Anthony Turiano" m wrote in message ... My wife and I have recently acquired a 1-26B with a Ball 400/6 (not a new installation). It is plumbed parallel with a Winter mech. (and T.E. probe). Since we acquired it, the Ball indicates climb pretty much at all times, and no amount of adjustment (red knob on back), setting selections, etc. have made a difference. The Winter works fine, and I can identify no problems with the flask or plumbing. I note there are 2 potentiometers pigtailed off the back of the instrument, but I have no paperwork or manual of any kind on it. I was wondering if anyone knew where I could send it for overhaul, and better yet, if anyone has data or ideas I could use first to more completely troubleshoot/adjust it in the field. Short of that my next step would be to find someone with a hole in their panel to take it up in their ship for a test hop... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 00:32 23 November 2003, Anthony Turiano wrote:
My wife and I have recently acquired a 1-26B with a Ball 400/6 (not a new installation). It is plumbed parallel with a Winter mech. (and T.E. probe). Since we acquired it, the Ball indicates climb pretty much at all times, and no amount of adjustment (red knob on back), setting selections, etc. have made a difference. The Winter works fine, and I can identify no problems with the flask or plumbing. I note there are 2 potentiometers pigtailed off the back of the instrument, but I have no paperwork or manual of any kind on it. I was wondering if anyone knew where I could send it for overhaul, and better yet, if anyone has data or ideas I could use first to more completely troubleshoot/adjust it in the field. Short of that my next step would be to find someone with a hole in their panel to take it up in their ship for a test hop... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16 Jun 2009 21:15:08 GMT, Brian Griffin
wrote: At 00:32 23 November 2003, Anthony Turiano wrote: My wife and I have recently acquired a 1-26B with a Ball 400/6 (not a new installation). It is plumbed parallel with a Winter mech. (and T.E. probe). Since we acquired it, the Ball indicates climb pretty much at all times, and no amount of adjustment (red knob on back), setting selections, etc. have made a difference. The Winter works fine, and I can identify no problems with the flask or plumbing. Does "pretty much all the time" include on the ground? If so, it's the instrument electronics. If not, I'd suspect a leak between the Ball and its flask. The suction from the total-energy probe would suck air from the leak through the instrument, giving a climb indication. Finding a leak can be tricky, but detecting its presence is a simple matter of pressure testing with a water manometer. Put some water in a length of transparent tubing, let it hang in a U shape, connect one end to the probe connection, and CAREFULLY lower the other end until the water levels in the two arms of the U are a few inches different. If the system is leak-free, it will hold that pressure difference indefinitely. Obviously, be very careful not to let water into the plumbing! Always keep the level in the outer arm lower, so you're applying suction, not positive pressure. rj |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Define "lift all the time" for me. I had a vario that when on the
ground was showing slightly up all the time. This (winter?) mechanical vario doesn't have any adjustments available. I was told that the paint on the needle looses a slight amount of mass over time. The fix was applying a very small amount of clear nail polish to the needle until it settled down to zero. Took a few dabs to do but fixed the issue. On the leak test idea from Ralph - Interesting but I don't quite get it so let's see if we can add some more details. There are three possible culprits of leakage. 1) The tubing (from tail to vario and from vario to bottle). 2) The vario (often at the face plate). 3) the bottle. Now to test. So I have a U shaped tube with some water in it. Disconnect the TE probe. Attach the U shaped water tube to the female TE probe's connection on the ship (typically at the rudder). Be very careful not to allow water into the ship's tubing going back to the vario for obvious reasons. At this point one end of the U tube is open to the air (true?) and the other end is aimed back at the vario/bottle. Then create some slight positive pressure on the system (ship's tubing to vario to capacity bottle) by lowering the open end. I would think that the open end would need to be sealed to create this pressure. Because the ship's tubing and vario is a sealed system (we assume), the water in the tube will not be level. Mark the current water levels. Then check back in an hour. If the two levels haven't changed, then the tubing+vario+bottle are leak free. If the levels have changed (become level over time) then you have a problem somethere in the system. To determine which part is leaking you need to do a process of elimination by performing the same test at the vario and then at the bottle. Thanks, John DeRosa |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:30:45 -0700 (PDT), ContestID67
wrote: [snip] at the vario/bottle. Then create some slight positive pressure on the system (ship's tubing to vario to capacity bottle) by lowering the open end. I would think that the open end would need to be sealed to create this pressure. No, the end away from the probe connection should be open. The pressure is provided purely by the unbalanced weight of water in the two arms of the U. Since you have the system pressure on one end and atmospheric pressure on the other, you're measuring the "gage" pressure, or the difference between the two. One inch of height difference between the arms represents about 0.036 psi. You can make the gage pressure either positive (water level higher in the outer arm) or negative (higher in the inner arm), but negative is safer: if the system is indeed leaking under positive pressure, the water level in the inner arm will gradually rise, and if you aren't sufficiently careful, it can get pushed into the system. rj |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Instrument overhaul - Are all overhauls created equal? | RonLee | Home Built | 1 | February 7th 05 06:35 PM |
Major Overhaul | Jim Weir | Owning | 10 | June 8th 04 05:12 PM |
Engine... Overhaul? / Replace? advice please | text news | Owning | 11 | February 17th 04 04:44 PM |
Overhaul? Lead flakes in oil - interpretation please | Les Sullivan | Owning | 14 | February 7th 04 05:29 PM |
O-200 overhaul & Vari EZ value | Steve Ruse | Home Built | 13 | October 21st 03 09:52 PM |