![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How did it stack up against the K6e, SHK, etc.?
How are it's flying qualities? What's your thoughts? Thanks so much! -Nick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 4:50:36 PM UTC-4, wrote:
How did it stack up against the K6e, SHK, etc.? How are it's flying qualities? What's your thoughts? Thanks so much! -Nick My main memory is rigging the club 4... Very heavy centre section that must be held close to fuselage in order to connect controls; nervous work. Outer panels light. There is a flight report in Winning on the Wind vol 1 page 31-33; he found it slightly superior to the Ka-6, though larger and heavier.. He liked the handling and comfort for a tall man. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Have flown and assembled all three. Ka6 the easiest to assemble and easiest to fly, probably one of the nicest handling sailplanes ever built. Skylark 4 more involved to assemble, but very nice to fly, docile, and good climber. SHK wings heavy and require technique, but very manageable with a SoloRigger. The SHK will easily outperform the Ka6 and Skylark 4 . The handling is good, but not as docile as the Ka6 or 4. The Skylark 4 is very capable of all badge distances downwind and is enjoyable to fly. If you are considering buying a Skylark 4 , you should call Bruce Beddow who has owned a 4 for over 20 years.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I did 2 diamonds in K6e and Skylark 4 in the UK. 300 triangle in the Skylark, so amazingly comfortable and roomy, a gentleman's machine. Trim in pitch the best,can fly hands off. K6e a disaster in this respect. Skylark 4 ailerons need some work, k6 a delight to fly, much easier for working the thermals, though the Skylark, once centered, allows you to eat your lunch. If you are a big chap I would go for the Skylark, especially if can be left in hangar with tips off. Airbrakes good on both, but skylark's are supreme, the best of any glider I have flown. Pete
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, April 11, 2017 at 1:50:36 PM UTC-7, wrote:
How did it stack up against the K6e, SHK, etc.? How are it's flying qualities? What's your thoughts? Thanks so much! -Nick Do you have a hangar which is at least big enough to accommodate the glider with the center section rigged? If so, then if K6E performance with a big comfortable cockpit appeal to you, a Skylark 4 is worth considering. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Slingsby T.61 MotorFalke | R. Wubben | Soaring | 11 | December 10th 17 07:38 PM |
For all things Slingsby | Jack Russell | Soaring | 0 | January 18th 15 11:20 PM |
Gliders at Camphill 2 - Slingsby T-41 Skylark 2C | Andrew B | Aviation Photos | 0 | July 1st 09 10:09 AM |
Skylark test flight and piloting technique. | Roger (K8RI) | Piloting | 0 | May 9th 07 03:05 AM |
Slingsby T-21 | Nyal Williams | Soaring | 14 | March 1st 07 08:28 AM |