![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given all the threads on spins lately, I would like to know about 201 and
301 spins. I have flown both (3 flights) and have not "tickled the tiger". They both required more then average attention to coordination. Shall I assume the spin readily, and do anything peculiar? Asssume CG in mid range. Thanks -- Hartley Falbaum |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No problems for me when my 301 spun.
David Grah Bishop California "HL Falbaum" wrote in message news:5gdVb.193983$Rc4.1613691@attbi_s54... Given all the threads on spins lately, I would like to know about 201 and 301 spins. I have flown both (3 flights) and have not "tickled the tiger". They both required more then average attention to coordination. Shall I assume the spin readily, and do anything peculiar? Asssume CG in mid range. Thanks -- Hartley Falbaum |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Marry Daniel or David Grah" wrote: No problems for me when my 301 spun. David Grah Bishop California "HL Falbaum" wrote in message news:5gdVb.193983$Rc4.1613691@attbi_s54... Given all the threads on spins lately, I would like to know about 201 and 301 spins. I have flown both (3 flights) and have not "tickled the tiger". They both required more then average attention to coordination. Shall I assume the spin readily, and do anything peculiar? Asssume CG in mid range. Thanks -- Hartley Falbaum 301's are placarded against spins, I think due to the ineffective divebrakes. I've had two 301's. Both would stall and spin if asked to. Flap position makes a big difference in stall characteristics. Flaps full up (negative) and it stall like a Grob twin. Full back stick, shaking like hell, ailerons still effective. Flaps in thermalling position and it stalls fairly abruptly albeit with fair warning. Spin entry is normal, the nose goes pretty much straight down. Rotation rate is fairly fast. If you hold the stick back in the spin, the rudder will be completely ineffective and feels like it is disconnected. Stick forward and the rudder becomes effective. Recovery is then no different than a 1-26 (except for the acceleration ; ). I once had an interesting experience recovering from a spin in a 301. Upon stopping the rotation, I came back on the stick a little too soon. I got an accelerated stall and the glider made another turn very fast. Pretty much like a snap roll going straight down. Got my attention. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Had a 201B for a while, spun it a few times, it tends
to oscillate in pitch a fair amount which can be a little disconcerting if you're not expecting it.. At 00:54 08 February 2004, Marry Daniel Or David Grah wrote: No problems for me when my 301 spun. David Grah Bishop California 'HL Falbaum' wrote in message news:5gdVb.193983$Rc4.1613691@attbi_s54... Given all the threads on spins lately, I would like to know about 201 and 301 spins. I have flown both (3 flights) and have not 'tickled the tiger'. They both required more then average attention to coordination. Shall I assume the spin readily, and do anything peculiar? Asssume CG in mid range. Thanks -- Hartley Falbaum |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HL Falbaum" wrote in message news:5gdVb.193983$Rc4.1613691@attbi_s54...
Given all the threads on spins lately, I would like to know about 201 and 301 spins. I have flown both (3 flights) and have not "tickled the tiger". They both required more then average attention to coordination. Shall I assume the spin readily, and do anything peculiar? Asssume CG in mid range. Thanks I have been flying my H301 for the last 18years and have not yet encountered any problems with spins or spin recovery. My ship gives me plenty of warning, i.e. rumbling noise and stick shaking. If not heeded, the spin will follow rather quickly. Recovery does not require anything else than neutralizing the controls. However, since the spins are pretty steep, one is looking at mother earth and the speed could get out of hand if a GENTLE pull-up is not initiated soon. Ulrich Neumann Libelle 'GM' |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"HL Falbaum" wrote in message news:5gdVb.193983$Rc4.1613691@attbi_s54...
Given all the threads on spins lately, I would like to know about 201 and 301 spins. I have flown both (3 flights) and have not "tickled the tiger". They both required more then average attention to coordination. Shall I assume the spin readily, and do anything peculiar? Asssume CG in mid range. Thanks Generally, I don't find our 201 particularly prone to spinning: I have unintentionally stalled it while circling in rough thermals more times than I probably should, but never with any real spin developing. I have only really spun it once, and that was while asking for it. I tried (at 4000 feet) what would happen if I flew with full airbrakes and the stick held completely back against the rear stop (silly, but someone said that you could do that). It actually just sat there, pretty stable and decending at a high rate, until I hit a little bit of turbulence: WHAM. It turned what felt like half inverted (probably wasn't), fell through and spun. No big issue - putting the airbrakes back in and doing a standard recovery worked fine. It did surprise me a bit that it did roll a bit far and took some time before putting the nose down and entering a proper spin, but that may well have been the effect of having the airbrakes deployed (memo to self: don't fly uncoordinated and stalled on approach with airbrakes deployed :-) Since that episode we have added the winglet option to our 201 which does make the stall behaviour (especially in thermalling turns) very docile, compared to the non-wingletted version. But, if my fading memory serves me correct, it wasn't spin-prone before we added the winglets. But it may feel that way though - it can feel a little wobbly when thermalled too slowly. In general, the different Libelles that I have flown tend to be quite a bit different in handling. Incidentially, our 201 is placarded against intentional spins (I don't recall whether that is in the handbook as well?). And, anyway, I wouldn't spin any glider intentionally with only three flights on the type. I'd like to get to know it a bit before doing that. Bo Brunsgaard Std. Libelle OY-XKB |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To follow up on my earlier comments, I also did not
find it a spin prone glider.. It's interesting that yours was placarded against deliberate spinning - ours was not. And although they're on different registers (and I sold my share in 1997) it would be interesting to know why your is.. Mark At 13:24 09 February 2004, Bo Brunsgaard wrote: 'HL Falbaum' wrote in message news:... Given all the threads on spins lately, I would like to know about 201 and 301 spins. I have flown both (3 flights) and have not 'tickled the tiger'. They both required more then average attention to coordination. Shall I assume the spin readily, and do anything peculiar? Asssume CG in mid range. Thanks Generally, I don't find our 201 particularly prone to spinning: I have unintentionally stalled it while circling in rough thermals more times than I probably should, but never with any real spin developing. I have only really spun it once, and that was while asking for it. I tried (at 4000 feet) what would happen if I flew with full airbrakes and the stick held completely back against the rear stop (silly, but someone said that you could do that). It actually just sat there, pretty stable and decending at a high rate, until I hit a little bit of turbulence: WHAM. It turned what felt like half inverted (probably wasn't), fell through and spun. No big issue - putting the airbrakes back in and doing a standard recovery worked fine. It did surprise me a bit that it did roll a bit far and took some time before putting the nose down and entering a proper spin, but that may well have been the effect of having the airbrakes deployed (memo to self: don't fly uncoordinated and stalled on approach with airbrakes deployed :-) Since that episode we have added the winglet option to our 201 which does make the stall behaviour (especially in thermalling turns) very docile, compared to the non-wingletted version. But, if my fading memory serves me correct, it wasn't spin-prone before we added the winglets. But it may feel that way though - it can feel a little wobbly when thermalled too slowly. In general, the different Libelles that I have flown tend to be quite a bit different in handling. Incidentially, our 201 is placarded against intentional spins (I don't recall whether that is in the handbook as well?). And, anyway, I wouldn't spin any glider intentionally with only three flights on the type. I'd like to get to know it a bit before doing that. Bo Brunsgaard Std. Libelle OY-XKB |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Stevens wrote in message ...
To follow up on my earlier comments, I also did not find it a spin prone glider.. It's interesting that yours was placarded against deliberate spinning - ours was not. And although they're on different registers (and I sold my share in 1997) it would be interesting to know why your is.. I'll have a look in the manual tonight (it's stashed away for the winter somewhere in my office at home), and see if that says anything. But as far as memory (however fading) serves me, there is nothing prohibiting spinning in there. The placard, for all I can see, appears to be an original, supplied from the factory (same typeface, color etc). It says "No aerobatic manouvers, including spins". Originally the Libelle had its first home in Sweden, if that may have anything to do with it? As for serial number, it's # 566. If there is a difference related to that, I would expect it to be between the 201 and the 201B version? Anyway, it doesn't matter a lot to me - I don't spin it. Having worked hard to win altitude (some of us must hard work to make up for lack of talent....), I don't want to blow it away again by spinning. I prefer using it to glide to some far-away muddy farmer's field and land there :-( Bo |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My 301 is not placarded against spinning. Could it be that the serial number
is a factor? I have Nr. 23. Regards, Roderick |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Rod" wrote: My 301 is not placarded against spinning. Could it be that the serial number is a factor? I have Nr. 23. Regards, Roderick Mine current 301 is Nr. 25 and is placarded against spins. My previous 301 was Nr. 28. It too was placarded against spins. I imported Nr 25 from Germany three years ago. Nr. 28 has lived it's whole life in the USA. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 05:14 AM |
Spin Training | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 25 | April 12th 04 02:11 PM |
Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 02:18 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |