![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I already asked this in another thread concerning the same subject, without getting an answer: Why should every pilot have his own personal flight recorder? If there is one per glider, this will be more than enough! In fact, it never happens that all gliders on a site are busy with competition tasks and/or FAI badge flights. This makes the cost of an approved FR (Volkslogger or Colibri or the like cost about half the price of a 760 channel approved radio set) much more bearable. In my opinion, it's fully comparable with what a barograph cost twenty years ago. And nobody complained about that, as far as I remember. Accepting COTS makes the work of the official observer more difficult - we use them in local competitions, and they need to be checked much more thoroughly than IGC FR's. Plus, multiplying the possible types makes it a real challenge for anybody save true computer nerds to keep up with all the different connexions, logging software, etc. It's bad enough as it is, even the professional evaluation software makers have difficulties in keeping up with it. -- stephanevdv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
stephanevdv wrote:
Why should every pilot have his own personal flight recorder? No they shouldn't. On the other side most clubs couldn't buy it for the members either. Most clubs are happy to survive and keep the gliders and other equipments... This makes the cost of an approved FR (Volkslogger or Colibri or the like cost about half the price of a 760 channel approved radio set) much more bearable. In my opinion, it's fully comparable with what a barograph cost twenty years ago. And nobody complained about that, as far as I remember. Those days there was no other solution... Accepting COTS makes the work of the official observer more difficult - we use them in local competitions, and they need to be checked much more thoroughly than IGC FR's. Plus, multiplying the possible types makes it a real challenge for anybody save true computer nerds to keep up with all the different connexions, logging software, etc. It's bad enough as it is, even the professional evaluation software makers have difficulties in keeping up with it. OO makes it for free (maybe it costs some beers ![]() more (or even less) work to deal with these "loggers" than with photo+barograph. /Janos |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cheap GPS Loggers for FAI Badges - Status? | Papa3 | Soaring | 154 | June 17th 04 10:33 PM |
COTS loggers - Plan B | Papa3 | Soaring | 10 | June 10th 04 05:48 PM |