![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Let's say for some reason I had stored in the FR three different declarations made on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. As far as I know, it is impossible to have different declarations in one FR! What you can have is different flight plans, tasks or whatever you wish to call them. But the only FAI declaration will be the task you last selected as FAI declaration. The declaration date and hour will be those of the moment when you made that choice. -- stephanevdv ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is where the confusion gets going. I can have
multiple TASKS stored in my FR. I nominate one of them as the one to be auto-declared. At takeoff [for the Colibri] or turn-on [for the Volks] this one TASK is selected as the current DECLARATION. This selection, made by the instrument, is the latest valid declaration. I chose it by having a particular TASK previously nominated as the one to be declared. That is not necessarily the last task defined to or loaded into the instrument - I could choose to have the task I defined on Monday as the one to be declared, even though I defined another one on Wednesday. We seem to agree that the declaration is made when a task is selected, not when it is defined. [This is not quite consistent with Marc's opinion that a paper declaration may prevail if it is written and signed after the auto-declared electronic task was loaded into the FR. But who says rules have to be consistent ?] Separately, Marc asserts that the OO must be aware of the paper declaration, since he signed it. What if it was signed in advance by a different OO from the one who supervises the FR download ? My own opinion, for what it's worth but what I'll fly by, is that if a FR is aboard and has auto-declared a task, that was my last and only declaration for that flight. Ian At 17:36 16 October 2004, Stephanevdv wrote: Let's say for some reason I had stored in the FR three different declarations made on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. As far as I know, it is impossible to have different declarations in one FR! What you can have is different flight plans, tasks or whatever you wish to call them. But the only FAI declaration will be the task you last selected as FAI declaration. The declaration date and hour will be those of the moment when you made that choice. -- stephanevdv ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Posted via OziPilots Online [ http://www.OziPilotsOnline.com.au ] - A website for Australian Pilots regardless of when, why, or what they fly - |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Cant wrote:
We seem to agree that the declaration is made when a task is selected, not when it is defined. [This is not quite consistent with Marc's opinion that a paper declaration may prevail if it is written and signed after the auto-declared electronic task was loaded into the FR. But who says rules have to be consistent ?] I examined some IGC files from a Volkslogger I had a few years back, and indeed, the date/time of declaration appears to be either that at which the unit was turned on or at takeoff (it's hard to tell which, exactly). If true, this is incorrect behavior with the respect to the requirements laid out in the IGC technical specifications, and will be looked into further. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. We will also look into the Colibri declaration behavior. Separately, Marc asserts that the OO must be aware of the paper declaration, since he signed it. What if it was signed in advance by a different OO from the one who supervises the FR download ? I think it is clear that the intent of the Sporting Code is that there be only one OO for a given flight performance. Of course you can game the system by having multiple OOs who are unaware of each other, but that falls in the general category of cheating. My own opinion, for what it's worth but what I'll fly by, is that if a FR is aboard and has auto-declared a task, that was my last and only declaration for that flight. This would be true, but it would not happen if your flight recorder was behaving as specified by the IGC. The 302 I use now, and the GPS-NAV I had in the past, do not auto-declare tasks (however, the GPS-NAV does have another known problem with declarations). If there are flight recorders which are auto-declaring tasks, they need to be fixed... Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why does the Sporting code require "Goal" to be a finish point??? | Mark Zivley | Soaring | 31 | October 18th 04 10:31 PM |
Run up for plug clearing | Roger Long | Piloting | 78 | October 18th 04 03:39 AM |
FAI Sporting Code Section 3 experts wanted | Stewart Kissel | Soaring | 28 | September 1st 04 05:58 PM |
Winscore source code now available | Guy Byars | Soaring | 0 | February 5th 04 10:43 AM |
Need Help with Northstar M1 Loran | Jerald Malin | Owning | 4 | December 8th 03 05:38 PM |