![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
All right, I *know* it's a stupid idea. But it seems like it'd be fun to
build. I've got a Narco Escort II in my airplane. Like most (all?) Narcos, it requires separate antennas for the transmit and receive sides. My airplane has a ~25-year-old coax dipole antenna, and the "CW McCall's Revenge" antenna I posted about a few years back. See: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/stories/antenna.htm I was flying today, and got complaints about the quality of my comm radio transmissions. Back at the shed, I switched the transmit antenna to the "McCall's Revenge" side, and a quick test to the Superunicom seemed to indicate it was back to normal. The older dipole may be finally giving out...not surprising, since its mate did, three years back. It seemed to work OK on the receive side, but it's obvious that I should put either some thought into a new antenna (or a new radio that needs only one). I *hate* external antennas. They're ugly. I prefer other options. Jim Weir sent me some copper tape and some baluns for a new dipole, but I recently installed a big metal inspection panel in the belly of the beast (which is where I'd originally planned to mount the dipole) and it's too tough to get into the tail cone to install it further back. (Belly panel at: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/tech/belly_pan.html) I was mulling over the possibilities as I started my car to head home. Then I noticed the low-pitched buzzing noise: The car radio antenna extending. Why not build a retracting comm antenna? My first thought would be to modify a car unit. Too bulky, too heavy. My second was to *not* have a "collapsible" type antenna. I considered just a rod that would slide out a small hole in the belly, but thought that this would be tough to do with an ordinary whip...I'd need a long bar with gear teeth to engage the motor. My final thought was to go with a "hinged" type instead. Have a actuator that rotates the antenna through 90 degrees... have it parallel to the belly when the power's off, but rotates to vertical when power is applied. Like a landing gear. Anybody got some suggestions for sources for small 90-degree actuators like this...or any other ideas for retractable antennas? Ron Wanttaja |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Way back in the 1960's when metal gliders flew in contests, an external whip
antenna was considered a lot of unnecessary drag. Several pilots rigged retractable antennas. The one I remembered used a curved tube with the whip and coax inside. The pilot just pushed it out until a stop was reached that allowed just enough whip exposure for a 1/4 wave at 123.3 MHz. The radios were vacuum tube so they were only used when they were really needed, otherwise they ran the batteries down fast. That description probably left out a lot of important details, but it's all I remember. Bill Daniels "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message ... All right, I *know* it's a stupid idea. But it seems like it'd be fun to build. I've got a Narco Escort II in my airplane. Like most (all?) Narcos, it requires separate antennas for the transmit and receive sides. My airplane has a ~25-year-old coax dipole antenna, and the "CW McCall's Revenge" antenna I posted about a few years back. See: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/stories/antenna.htm I was flying today, and got complaints about the quality of my comm radio transmissions. Back at the shed, I switched the transmit antenna to the "McCall's Revenge" side, and a quick test to the Superunicom seemed to indicate it was back to normal. The older dipole may be finally giving out...not surprising, since its mate did, three years back. It seemed to work OK on the receive side, but it's obvious that I should put either some thought into a new antenna (or a new radio that needs only one). I *hate* external antennas. They're ugly. I prefer other options. Jim Weir sent me some copper tape and some baluns for a new dipole, but I recently installed a big metal inspection panel in the belly of the beast (which is where I'd originally planned to mount the dipole) and it's too tough to get into the tail cone to install it further back. (Belly panel at: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/tech/belly_pan.html) I was mulling over the possibilities as I started my car to head home. Then I noticed the low-pitched buzzing noise: The car radio antenna extending. Why not build a retracting comm antenna? My first thought would be to modify a car unit. Too bulky, too heavy. My second was to *not* have a "collapsible" type antenna. I considered just a rod that would slide out a small hole in the belly, but thought that this would be tough to do with an ordinary whip...I'd need a long bar with gear teeth to engage the motor. My final thought was to go with a "hinged" type instead. Have a actuator that rotates the antenna through 90 degrees... have it parallel to the belly when the power's off, but rotates to vertical when power is applied. Like a landing gear. Anybody got some suggestions for sources for small 90-degree actuators like this...or any other ideas for retractable antennas? Ron Wanttaja |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message ... All right, I *know* it's a stupid idea. But it seems like it'd be fun to build. I've got a Narco Escort II in my airplane. Like most (all?) Narcos, it requires separate antennas for the transmit and receive sides. My airplane has a ~25-year-old coax dipole antenna, and the "CW McCall's Revenge" antenna I posted about a few years back. See: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/stories/antenna.htm I was flying today, and got complaints about the quality of my comm radio transmissions. Back at the shed, I switched the transmit antenna to the "McCall's Revenge" side, and a quick test to the Superunicom seemed to indicate it was back to normal. The older dipole may be finally giving out...not surprising, since its mate did, three years back. It seemed to work OK on the receive side, but it's obvious that I should put either some thought into a new antenna (or a new radio that needs only one). I *hate* external antennas. They're ugly. I prefer other options. Jim Weir sent me some copper tape and some baluns for a new dipole, but I recently installed a big metal inspection panel in the belly of the beast (which is where I'd originally planned to mount the dipole) and it's too tough to get into the tail cone to install it further back. (Belly panel at: http://www.bowersflybaby.com/tech/belly_pan.html) I was mulling over the possibilities as I started my car to head home. Then I noticed the low-pitched buzzing noise: The car radio antenna extending. Why not build a retracting comm antenna? My first thought would be to modify a car unit. Too bulky, too heavy. My second was to *not* have a "collapsible" type antenna. I considered just a rod that would slide out a small hole in the belly, but thought that this would be tough to do with an ordinary whip...I'd need a long bar with gear teeth to engage the motor. My final thought was to go with a "hinged" type instead. Have a actuator that rotates the antenna through 90 degrees... have it parallel to the belly when the power's off, but rotates to vertical when power is applied. Like a landing gear. Anybody got some suggestions for sources for small 90-degree actuators like this...or any other ideas for retractable antennas? Ron Wanttaja Why not put the tape on the outside? Put fabric tape over that, file to fit, paint to match. Surely you could fish a coax into the tailcone? Tim Ward |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 19:05:56 -0700, "Tim Ward"
wrote: Why not put the tape on the outside? Put fabric tape over that, file to fit, paint to match. Surely you could fish a coax into the tailcone? Sure, but "nailing down" the coax along the run is problematic. I don't want to leave it free to flop around and perhaps snag the elevator walking beam bellcrank (located behind the pilot seat at the bottom of the fuselage). I'd like to get the antenna oriented vertically, too, though for the receive side, the longitudinal orientation would probably be fine. Certainly an option, though. Ron Wanttaja |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sure, but "nailing down" the coax along the run is problematic. How about using some polyurethane caulk to use as glue, instead of nailing it down. A couple of nail straps for the ends to take the strain, then a few blobs along the way. It is supposed to stay flexible, and is strong as snot. -- Jim in NC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 5 Sep 2004 23:56:16 -0400, "Morgans"
wrote: How about using some polyurethane caulk to use as glue, instead of nailing it down. A couple of nail straps for the ends to take the strain, then a few blobs along the way. It is supposed to stay flexible, and is strong as snot. Access is the problem, not the physical means of attachment. I have to work through a standard 3 1/2" inspection hole, accessing an area ~24" away along the same piece of fabric. Imagine wiring your instrument panel by working through a single instrument hole...that's the kind of access we're talking about. Too bad mama's little boy went off to school to be an engineer, and not a proctologist. :-) I want to assure folks that I'm not saying it's impossible. I'll find a way to secure it if I go with the copper-tape in the tailcone, if that turns out to be the best solution. I'm just exploring the options...one of which is to pull the Escort and replace it with a modern single-antenna comm radio. Or add some velcro for a handheld.... Ron Wanttaja |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Wanttaja wrote:
... I'd like to get the antenna oriented vertically, too, though for the receive side, the longitudinal orientation would probably be fine. On the Escort II, both nav and comm receive from the nav antenna, which should be oriented horizontally for more critical nav purposes. Comm sensitivity is affected, of course, but on my Escort II it receives comm more than good enough. Fred F. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 08:26:01 -0400, "TaxSrv" wrote:
Ron Wanttaja wrote: ... I'd like to get the antenna oriented vertically, too, though for the receive side, the longitudinal orientation would probably be fine. On the Escort II, both nav and comm receive from the nav antenna, which should be oriented horizontally for more critical nav purposes. Comm sensitivity is affected, of course, but on my Escort II it receives comm more than good enough. The original suite of antennas on my plane was *two* horizontally oriented dipoles. Under a metal turtledeck cover. Worked pretty good, for both receive and transmit. I've never used the VOR function of my Escort, so horizontal orientation on the receive side is not critical. I have, once or twice, considered replacing the Narco with a Comm/GPS unit. But then, I'd *still* have a second antenna to install... Ron Wanttaja |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My first thought would be to modify a car unit. Too bulky, too heavy.
G'day Ron, Have a look at some of the car ones, and the replacement centres. Many of the ones to suit the Aussie cars have a plastic extension shaft inside that could be operated like a push pull cable from the cockpit. This would be very light without the motor and most of the mounting bracket. Now where did I leave the angle grinder? You could even have different stops marked for different radio frequency bands if you wanted to use the one antenna for different bands. Add it to your checklist, just like flaps, with take off, cruise, pre aerobatic and landing settings! Hope this helps, Peter |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 12:22:58 +1000, "Bushy" wrote:
Have a look at some of the car ones, and the replacement centres. Many of the ones to suit the Aussie cars have a plastic extension shaft inside that could be operated like a push pull cable from the cockpit. This would be very light without the motor and most of the mounting bracket. Now where did I leave the angle grinder? You could even have different stops marked for different radio frequency bands if you wanted to use the one antenna for different bands. Add it to your checklist, just like flaps, with take off, cruise, pre aerobatic and landing settings! I'd have to take a look at one of the automotive ones, as, of course, the length would have to be changed to match the Comm frequencies and this may require some really fundamental fiddling with the existing mechanical aspects. And I hope to make this fully automatic, like a car antenna. Power-on the avionics bus, antenna erects. Power-off the bus, antenna stows. I like it when I don't have to think. Ron "That's why I've lasted on USENET for twenty years" Wanttaja |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another antenna question | David Wilson | Home Built | 7 | August 12th 04 10:04 PM |
Antenna ground plane and coax grounding | G. Fred McCutchen | Home Built | 2 | August 8th 04 12:27 PM |
ELT antenna -- Pitts | Al MacDonald | Home Built | 0 | July 15th 04 03:27 PM |
comm's RX antenna | acepilot | Home Built | 5 | March 3rd 04 05:34 PM |
Foil antenna and carbon fiber | BD5ER | Home Built | 11 | August 6th 03 04:44 AM |