![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
May I ask a question which is arguably on topic? As among Airtech,
Ceconite, Polyfiber and the other covering systems, which is best and why? One more, please? Which is cheapest? And finally, which is the best for your money and why? Thanks. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 21:00:11 -0400, " jls"
wrote: May I ask a question which is arguably on topic? As among Airtech, Ceconite, Polyfiber and the other covering systems, which is best and why? One more, please? Which is cheapest? And finally, which is the best for your money and why? Thanks. Found this website using "air tech covering" on Google: http://www.spava.com/Article.htm Be advised, the authors likes the Air Tech covering process. By the way, it appears that all the covering processes utilize some form of Dacron fabric (except for Razorback, which uses fiberglass cloth). There are only a few manufacturers of this type of fabric so it sure looks to me like there isn't much difference, one process from the next. Corky Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" jls" wrote in message ...
May I ask a question which is arguably on topic? As among Airtech, Ceconite, Polyfiber and the other covering systems, which is best and why? ------------------------------------------------- Razorback. It's permanent. ------------------------------------------------ Which is cheapest? ------------------------------------------------ Generic polyester fabric, contact cement and dope. But you left out: Which is lightest in weight?, Which is easiest to apply? and Which is most beloved amongst those who have never done any fabric work at all?, always a hot topic on this Newsgroup :-) -R.S.Hoover |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Hoover" wrote in message om... " jls" wrote in message ... [...] Which is cheapest? ------------------------------------------------ Generic polyester fabric, contact cement and dope. Excellent. Where may this dope be bought? If you buy it from the aircraft suppliers you pay an arm and a leg, plus awful hazmat charges. But you left out: Which is lightest in weight?, Which is easiest to apply? and Which is most beloved amongst those who have never done any fabric work at all?, always a hot topic on this Newsgroup :-) -R.S.Hoover Mr. Hoover, kind sir, could you (or someone else as knowledgeable) answer those questions you posed? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" jls" wrote in message
.. . May I ask a question which is arguably on topic? As among Airtech, Ceconite, Polyfiber and the other covering systems, which is best and why? One more, please? Which is cheapest? And finally, which is the best for your money and why? Thanks. If you're covering for the first time, I believe that the Stits/Polyfiber process is the best. They have very good instructions and no questions on what materials to use. -- Turbo Tiger |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Turbo Tiger" wrote in message news:9iw9d.355527$Fg5.15893@attbi_s53... " jls" wrote in message .. . May I ask a question which is arguably on topic? As among Airtech, Ceconite, Polyfiber and the other covering systems, which is best and why? One more, please? Which is cheapest? And finally, which is the best for your money and why? Thanks. If you're covering for the first time, I believe that the Stits/Polyfiber process is the best. They have very good instructions and no questions on what materials to use. -- Turbo Tiger I guess I'm a little bit of a gypsy cause I've used the Stits process and just loved it but e x p e n s i v e. They tell me to cover a Cub you need $4000 for materials and paint. And now Polyfiber, which was Stits, has bought out Ceconite. Polyfiber has an xlnt manual, btw, have used it from cover to cover. Folks in one of the biplane yahoogroups swear by the Airtech process, so maybe they're a little less costly. All the best to you, Turbo and Corky and Veedubber. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Before you select the cheapest, may I suggest that you google on "Steve Wittman" and "accident". Jim - Which is cheapest? - Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup) VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor http://www.rst-engr.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Weir" wrote in message ... Before you select the cheapest, may I suggest that you google on "Steve Wittman" and "accident". Jim Hey, Jim, I wouldn't violate an STC. I know all about Steve's tragic accident and have read all the reports and articles. He unwisely used dope as a fastener with the Stits process, which requires a vinyl-based glue and weave filler to fasten dacron polyester to the wing structure. Catastrophic flutter after fabric came loose on a wing or aileron is officially alleged to be the cause of the deadly crash of his O-470-powered O&O Special. May the great Steve Wittman and his new wife RIP. And, by the way, I have used dacron often as a peel-ply for wet layups when doing fiberglas work. That helpful quality of dacron polyester, i. e., that it doesn't stick and readily peels away after the layup has cured, is enough to put one on notice that you better not use the wrong glue for dacron unless you want to get your aXX busted. I am just trying, cheapskate that I am, to find the best LEGAL covering system for the money, not an aXXbuster. Airtech, I understand, uses a different kind of glue. From what I can read you don't, and can't, fasten dacron to an airframe with glues like dope. You are compelled to penetrate the weave with a glue --Polytak, for example -- which develops its own structure in the woven interstices of the dacron with a web-like grip. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jls wrote:
"Jim Weir" wrote in message ... Before you select the cheapest, may I suggest that you google on "Steve Wittman" and "accident". Jim Hey, Jim, I wouldn't violate an STC. I know all about Steve's tragic accident and have read all the reports and articles. He unwisely used dope as a fastener with the Stits process, which requires a vinyl-based glue and weave filler to fasten dacron polyester to the wing structure. Catastrophic flutter after fabric came loose on a wing or aileron is officially alleged to be the cause of the deadly crash of his O-470-powered O&O Special. May the great Steve Wittman and his new wife RIP. And, by the way, I have used dacron often as a peel-ply for wet layups when doing fiberglas work. That helpful quality of dacron polyester, i. e., that it doesn't stick and readily peels away after the layup has cured, is enough to put one on notice that you better not use the wrong glue for dacron unless you want to get your aXX busted. I am just trying, cheapskate that I am, to find the best LEGAL covering system for the money, not an aXXbuster. Airtech, I understand, uses a different kind of glue. From what I can read you don't, and can't, fasten dacron to an airframe with glues like dope. You are compelled to penetrate the weave with a glue --Polytak, for example -- which develops its own structure in the woven interstices of the dacron with a web-like grip. Unlike linen, polyester fiber has no nap. There is nothing for the dope to hold on to. Poly Tack (the polyfiber fabric cement) encapsulates the polyester fiber, giving good shear and (adequate) peal strength. After that, the finishing system chosen is probably based more on personal preference than technical merit. I used Polyfiber (Stits) on my parasol and am very pleased with the results. Yes, it's a bit more expensive than some of the others, but it's by far the easiest to repair (IMHO). I also appreciate the non- flammibility issue. Having said that, I'm seriously thinking about using Aerotech process on Doc's new parasol. The reason for that is that Doc wants the airplane to be as light as possible (His goal is under 400 pounds with a 2180). And, from what I've seen, it produces a very smooth glossy surface. I believe the single coat Aerotech system will be considerably lighter than 6 coats of Polyfiber. (well duh!) On the other other hand, it will be more difficult to repair without the repairs showing. Richard Lamb http://home.earthlink.net/~n6228l/index.htm |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having done a little dope and fabric work
(since 1947) for a thrifty job on a Cub size acft start out with 50 yds of 2.7 oz dacron from Acft Spruce and use their uncertified tapes , 25 gals of Certified Dope (Acft Spruce) . Thin this mess with wash lacquer thinner. Glue your fabric on with a good quality contact cementYou'l need a couple of cans of aluminum paste and a roll of dacron ribstitch cord. Is this safe? well theirs a helluva lot of P51 rudders, a slew of wild cats, bearcats, B25, Corsairs a Beech Stagger wing. and yes the rudder off a real Jap Zero, some French Stampes, and on and on . You should be able to recover a Cub size acft (experimental) for about 1500 bucks through silver. After hearing about the high prices on Imron I checked our local auto paint supplier and found that premixed colors industril Imron goes for a little over 100 bucks a gallon and it includes reds and such colors as BFI blue, and John Dear Green. Minot Piper 325 692 0538 http://community.webtv.net/minotpiper/HELTONLARKWOODY |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|