![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok gang, just wanted to share with you guys a little about my trek today.
First off, this is the same Dave S who has been posting here for years. I just finally decided "what the hell" and use my full name. For those who think its "no big deal" just keep in mind I have had some issues in the past that have led me to be cautious. Anyways.. The mission today was to fly to SWRFI, The Southwest Regional Flyin. Today was the inagural year in Hondo, Texas, having been at New Braunsfels the past two years (then Abilene for a few years before that..I dont remember how long ago it was in Kerrville). I am based at Pearland Regional (KLVJ) in the Houston area and used a rental from the Bay Area Aero Club.. A Socata TB-9 Tampico that is on leaseback to us. The owners of this craft have a reputation for well maintained, well equipped leaseback planes, and this one is no exception: Dual King KX 155's, a color King GPS, a King Multifunction Display and a digital pushbutton transponder. The interior is clean, intact, and the upholstery is leather. For those unfamiliar with the Socata family, the cabin has a wide, spacious feel, and there is great visibility out the acres of windows. We (myself and another pilot/Club member) launched this morning from LVJ into marginal VFR conditions (ground fog/haze) but being at a Class G field, we were able to climb above it and proceed VFR the rest of the way. One downside to the Tampico. Its relatively underpowered in the TB-9 variant and climb rate is anemic at sea level. It was damn near non-existent above 4000 feet. That is the ONLY bad thing I have to relate about that airframe. We climbed to 6500 and stayed in the cool air (and avoided a pretty solid undercast for most of the trip). Things opened up as predicted and we shot the arrival into Hondo using the published VFR arrival procedures. In a nutshell, you approach from the east, along a freeway through a rural area outside of San Antonio. You cross over a few reporting points, and report yourself at them. The prodecure brings you in from the east at a 90 degree angle to the primary runway and you turn downwind, base and land as directed. They had other runways at their disposal for fast movers and special cases, including a parralel. We entered the procedure and reported in, and we started to fall in trail of a Glastar. At this point I will say that I was not the "pilot flying"... the other pilot is a friend of mine, but a new private pilot and in the sub-100 hr range, with about 5 hours in type. I'm comfortable with the radios, and was handling them for the flight following and arrival procedure. We didn't get slowed down enough and low enough according to the arrival prodecures to fall in trail of the Glastar, and I called in that we were overtaking him. At this point we were still EAST of the entry point, so we werent in the no-passing zone. This call was more of an advisory to the glastar than anything else. (This isn't Osh... they don't do the "airplane remains silent" thing at SWRFI). The arrival/approach folks told us at this point to deviate and continue straight overhead to the field, then enter a right downwind for Rwy 13 (the active was 17L, and the departure ends of these LONG runways do converge at the end). Ok.. No problem. The field is in sight. We have other traffic in sight, everything is hunky-dory. THEN.. when we are about 2 miles east of the field, arrival tells me I am supposed to go ahead and do a downwind to 17L.. and I SWORE I heard him say RIGHT downwind (when the procedure specifies LEFT downwind along the perimeter of the field). I wasn't sure WHAT I heard. I'm coming up on the turn point for the LEFT downwind really quickly when all of a sudden the arrival frequency gets busy.. three guys call in in rapid succession and I cant get a word in edgewise until im OVER the runway. I clarify things, found out we missed the turn after all. The arrival guy kept us on his frequency instead of tower, took us overhead and had us turn right downwind for 13 instead. We had some miscommunication in the cockpit and we ended up flying downwind OVER 13, and when my friend appeared to be trying to turn back towards 17... I asked for and recieved the plane controls, turned back to the left, made a circling downwind/base/final and landed short on 13. Ok.. all the excitement was over. I have to say, I was hoping things would have gone smoother than that.. We briefed the approach in the cockpit several times, including the airspeed/altitude and flight path restrictions. Changing the plan twice in the last 4 minutes did NOT help matters and I am wondering if we should have busted out. With regards to the frequency being busy.. the same thing happened to me last year.. where we are supposed to report in/turn at a certain point, and missed getting permission LAST year too.. anyways, rant off. Nothing was bent, nothing was close to getting bent (and nothing that would require a NASA form), and it all worked out in the end. Honestly, though, I like the Osh style approach (with a "FISK-like" location, but that would involve a much larger infrastructure than I believe is wanted. Once on the ground, we were directed by some strapping young CAP cadets and parked on far south end of an otherwise FULL ramp full of several hundred planes. We made the rounds of the factory built stuff and the experimentals. Saw the Velocity XL RG, the RV 7 and RV 10 factory planes.. a handful of Cozy's and Longs and one VERY distinctive Vari-Viggen. I saw a few local guys, including a new RV8 pilot who is hangared behind me at Ellington (where I am helping build a Velocity with Mazda Rotary), A bright red Thorpe T-18 that is from EFD as well, a few local (pearland) Yak Pilots were there with their planes as well. I saw a total of 4 cessna 195's.. never seen so many at once.. numerous RV's and other airframes filled the ramp. Grand Rapids and Dynon had displays on site. Diamond had the DA 40 opened up at their display booth on the ramp as well. We spent about 3-4 hours on the ground this time, walked the ramp, hit the booths and displays, bought t-shirts and do-hickeys in the "fly market" and in general just had a good time. Last year, at New Braunsfels, we took a car and went into town for lunch.. well Hondo just isnt the same town.. and suffice it to say we stayed on field and had a bit of fair food.. but we elected to come back home early. Departure was not nearly as interesting.. but I have the feeling that there was an "event" of some sort. We got clearance and fired up, and got direction from ground to taxi to the north end of the ramp. After runup, I switched to tower (but was still monitoring ground intermittently at that point) and was given clearance to take off (again, I wasnt the pilot flying so I was listening to the radios and double checking checklist items... and I heard Ground call for all aircraft not cleared by tower to hold position and shut down. I had my clearance and was pulling on the runway at this point, so we continued as cleared. I wasn't sure what was going on, since the airshow wasnt scheduled for another 30-40 minutes... but as we rotated and lifted off, I could see the fire truck rolling with their lights on.. and they were converging on the ultralight area. The circumstances tell me something happened. I don't know the details, and I HOPE it was minor... I will have to wait for feedback to know for sure. We departed per the posted procedure, then dropped into Castroville (T89) about 15 miles east for some $2.55 avgas. The fuel truck didn't have time to make it to us on the ramp at SWRFI so we refueled at the next point along the path home. Turns out it was cheaper this way anyways. Made it back to Pearland Regional around 4-5 pm, and just got back from Margarita's and Tacos... Overall.. I had fun. I will be back. The arrival was actually pretty simple, and we bore most of the responsibility for how our arrival turned out (altitude, airspeed, landing runway). The ramp was spacious, and there was room for twice as many planes as were parked there - the parking config was "pull through" instead of being "interlocked" tail to tail. The FAA guys looked like they were comfortable.. there were some "controller shacks" on the field that looked like permanent installations - I think the military has a training presence there. The "fly-in layout" appeared pretty decent... all in all the SWRFI guys did a good job. Critique wise.. 1) the controllers meant well, but changing plans twice on us didn't help much with a new pilot in the left seat going to an unfamiliar airport. There was no opposing traffic to the non-standard arrival we had been issued.. truth is.. we would have been past the gla-star and been on altitude and airspeed before entry into the procedure, so the deviation (and its recinsion, then re-issue) was unneeded in the first place. Note to self: emphasize arrival procedure airspeed and altitudes when doing the "pilot not flying" stuff next time - there was no reason we SHOULDNT have been properly in trail behind the glastar. 2) Fuel guys were doing "first come - first serve". Sounds fair.. but very inefficient. They were taking fuel orders on the phone as well as by flag-downs.. What was happeneing was.. they'd search for each plane that was next on the list.. and drive to opposite ends of the field in the process. Or at least that was my perception. I realize that it is not realistic to have an FBO buy a second fuel truck for a once a year event.. maybe their is a "loaner" solution to this somehow. I like the idea of marking the plane with a refueling sticker/sign and then just driving the line.. fill em as you get to them. 3) Last year, we were met on the ramp and given armbands in exchange for admission fees. This year, we walked the half mile or more to a pilot registration booth, then if we wanted to put anything on the plane like a prop-sign (or fuel sign, if one existed) we would have had to walk back.. roving pilot registration seems simpler - 2 to 3 golf carts could have accomplished it, even if they were simply parked down at the ends where people were arriving (rather than chasing planes down one by one) I hope nobody was seriously hurt in what I am presuming was an accident in the ultralight area. Any SWRFI guys reading this: Good Job, hope this location grows.. and hopefully this will be the end of the moves for a while. Dave Staten Houston Area, Texas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
does the eaa event continue tomorrow-sunday??
dan |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry about the late response..
There IS some activities today, but I dont know the scale. www.swrfi.org Dave houstondan wrote: does the eaa event continue tomorrow-sunday?? dan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
well shoot...gotta be in vegas for a pool tourney on tuesday. driving.
thought maybe i'd head over there today but it's been heavy t'storms all day. oh well...wanted to get a look at some of the light-sports that seem to coming out but not this time. texas seems to have more than it's share of light-sport start-ups, if you believe the stories. looks like the price difference between an old citabria and a new light sport may be getting pretty narrow. dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
First off, this is the same Dave S who has been posting here for years.
Welcome to the real world. You may wish you had taken the blue pill... :-) Anyways.. The mission today was to fly to SWRFI, The Southwest Regional Flyin. Great PIREP -- and a harrowing approach. IMO, I've found that the mid-sized fly-ins are MUCH more difficult to get into than either Airventure or Sun N Fun. They're just not as well organized, and don't have the manpower to keep things moving as smoothly. In all honesty, though, I must question the wisdom of a sub-100 hour pilot flying into a fly-in like this. The airspace around these things can be a real zoo, and your arrival experience is not atypical. I personally am glad that I didn't fly into anything like this until I had a few years of experience under my belt. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jay Honeck wrote: In all honesty, though, I must question the wisdom of a sub-100 hour pilot flying into a fly-in like this. The airspace around these things can be a real zoo, and your arrival experience is not atypical. I personally am glad that I didn't fly into anything like this until I had a few years of experience under my belt. Well... couple things.. He's a good stick.. intelligent.. responsible... and I thought he'd be up for the task.. thats why I invited him to fly with me. But the downside is I expected him to be able to "throw the brakes" on without a problem.. and be able to slow to 90 kts from 105 kts without a problem. 105 is what we were getting for a top speed in the underpowered Tampico. If we'd been in a Mooney or Tiger, he likely would have been PNF and I would have asked to be on the stick going in (like I did for Osh with a very low time pilot). Every other flight with him up to this point reinforced that he was up to the task. 100 hours means something different to me, I guess, than others. I was hot and heavy into instrument training at 100 hrs.. had my PPL at about 48 hours.. and had quite a bit of real PIC at that point... No, I didn't then nor now claim to know it all.. but I would have felt ready for something like that. My buddy hadn't given me any bad vibes that led me to believe this would be a problem. He is a creature of habit, though.. when I told him about how the OSH arrival works (over dinner a while back) without having to say a word over the radio, he coulnt believe it, and thought it'd be much safer "if the planes were talking to each other". Well, he just got his first exposure to frequency congestion at a critical moment. I hope it made my point from a few weeks back, that being on speed, on altitude, in trail and QUIETLY following instructions works best for that sort of event. Honestly, I think I created more of a problem with my "overtaking" call than if we had simply busted out and came back around (we weren't to the IP on the arrival yet..). The ATC guys, being probably unfamiliar with the Tampico and its performance, probably thought we literally were running over the Glastar trying to keep it down to 90 kts.. Thats what I get for trying to salvage something.. fix one problem and create two more. I was thinking if we salvaged the situation before we got to the IP, we could just pull away from the Glastar and everything would work out fine. In hindsight, we should have broke out and come around, and done it right. That would have reinforced that the procedure was there for a reason and would have removed some of the uncertainty. Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave S wrote in
ink.net: Jay Honeck wrote: In all honesty, though, I must question the wisdom of a sub-100 hour pilot flying into a fly-in like this. The airspace around these things can be a real zoo, and your arrival experience is not atypical. I personally am glad that I didn't fly into anything like this until I had a few years of experience under my belt. Well... couple things.. He's a good stick.. intelligent.. responsible... and I thought he'd be up for the task.. thats why I invited him to fly with me. But the downside is I expected him to be able to "throw the brakes" on without a problem.. and be able to slow to 90 kts from 105 kts without a problem. 105 is what we were getting for a top speed in the underpowered Tampico. If we'd been in a Mooney or Tiger, he likely would have been PNF and I would have asked to be on the stick going in (like I did for Osh with a very low time pilot). Every other flight with him up to this point reinforced that he was up to the task. 100 hours means something different to me, I guess, than others. I was hot and heavy into instrument training at 100 hrs.. had my PPL at about 48 hours.. and had quite a bit of real PIC at that point... No, I didn't then nor now claim to know it all.. but I would have felt ready for something like that. My buddy hadn't given me any bad vibes that led me to believe this would be a problem. He is a creature of habit, though.. when I told him about how the OSH arrival works (over dinner a while back) without having to say a word over the radio, he coulnt believe it, and thought it'd be much safer "if the planes were talking to each other". Well, he just got his first exposure to frequency congestion at a critical moment. I hope it made my point from a few weeks back, that being on speed, on altitude, in trail and QUIETLY following instructions works best for that sort of event. Honestly, I think I created more of a problem with my "overtaking" call than if we had simply busted out and came back around (we weren't to the IP on the arrival yet..). The ATC guys, being probably unfamiliar with the Tampico and its performance, probably thought we literally were running over the Glastar trying to keep it down to 90 kts.. Thats what I get for trying to salvage something.. fix one problem and create two more. I was thinking if we salvaged the situation before we got to the IP, we could just pull away from the Glastar and everything would work out fine. In hindsight, we should have broke out and come around, and done it right. That would have reinforced that the procedure was there for a reason and would have removed some of the uncertainty. Dave FYI one of the Gyro's crashed at the end of the ultralight runway, I didn't see it happen, but saw the twisted metal after. I think everyone was ok. -- -- ET :-) "A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools."---- Douglas Adams |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Flight test update - long | nauga | Home Built | 1 | June 5th 04 03:09 AM |
SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Home Built | 20 | May 21st 04 03:02 PM |
Why are TE probes so long? | Duane Eisenbeiss | Soaring | 36 | May 9th 04 06:58 AM |
IFR Long X/C and the Specter of Expectations | David B. Cole | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | February 24th 04 07:51 PM |