![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Flash!! A Washington Post story reprinted in the Seattle Times says that a
Cessna 150 is a turboprop!! Bob Gardner |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Bob Gardner
wrote: Flash!! A Washington Post story reprinted in the Seattle Times says that a Cessna 150 is a turboprop!! Oh, MAN, how cool would one of those be... -- Garner R. Miller ATP/CFII/MEI Clifton Park, NY =USA= |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Garner Miller wrote: In article , Bob Gardner wrote: Flash!! A Washington Post story reprinted in the Seattle Times says that a Cessna 150 is a turboprop!! Oh, MAN, how cool would one of those be... You'd run out of fuel during the taxi... Dave |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave S wrote: Garner Miller wrote: In article , Bob Gardner wrote: Flash!! A Washington Post story reprinted in the Seattle Times says that a Cessna 150 is a turboprop!! Oh, MAN, how cool would one of those be... You'd run out of fuel during the taxi... Dave They make turbine jet engines for model airplanes now. I even recall someone attaching a ring gear to the impeller and making a turbo prop out of it. So a turbo prop C 150 would not be impossible. So would a turboprop equiped C 150 have made the last three miles? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com, Sport Pilot wrote:
They make turbine jet engines for model airplanes now. I even recall someone attaching a ring gear to the impeller and making a turbo prop out of it. So a turbo prop C 150 would not be impossible. Someone made a turbojet powered Cri-Cri (a single seat aircraft normally powered by two small two-stroke engines on small pylons off the nose). The cheapest twinjet time in the world! -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dylan Smith wrote: In article . com, Sport Pilot wrote: They make turbine jet engines for model airplanes now. I even recall someone attaching a ring gear to the impeller and making a turbo prop out of it. So a turbo prop C 150 would not be impossible. Someone made a turbojet powered Cri-Cri (a single seat aircraft normally powered by two small two-stroke engines on small pylons off the nose). The cheapest twinjet time in the world! -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" Yes, the turbojet Cri-Cri was powered by two model airplane turbines, the largest available. I think they were over 30 lbs thrust each. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These folks are working on an economical GA turboprop that could
probably be fitted to a 152 just fine, they talk about FWF kits for other O-235 planes, why not the 152? http://www.innodyn.com/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ben Hallert" wrote in message ups.com... These folks are working on an economical GA turboprop that could probably be fitted to a 152 just fine, they talk about FWF kits for other O-235 planes, why not the 152? http://www.innodyn.com/ These folks have been peddling turbines for years under a couple of different company names (ATP was their first name). As of yet, I do not believe they have shipped any customer units. Something that really galls me about them is that they continue to push the idea that their fuel metering system is going to make their turbine nearly as efficient as a reciprocating engine. Ain't gonna happen unless they find a way around one of the laws of thermodynamics. Making their fuel efficiency claims/projections even more suspicious, they have been either "about to conduct" or "conducting" fuel efficiency tests for a number of years, but either don't do the testing, don't publish the results, or claim that the results are not representative. KB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ben Hallert" wrote in message ups.com... These folks are working on an economical GA turboprop that could probably be fitted to a 152 just fine, they talk about FWF kits for other O-235 planes, why not the 152? http://www.innodyn.com/ A 165 HP turboprop (the smallest they offer) would make for spritely performance, in a 152. The gross would need to be raised, and some extra tankage to carry enough fuel to make it worthwhile. What do you have, then? An old airplane with enough power to pull it apart? Hmmm. -- Jim in NC |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the was a 180hp 152 (t'dragger a-bat, i think) in t.a.p. and i thought
that was kinda way out there. reminds me of people putting big v-8 motors in little bitty brit sports cars years ago. looks like fun till you get to the first turn. dan |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CFI without commercial? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 75 | December 8th 10 04:17 PM |
Time, running out of fuel and fuel gauges | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 29 | February 3rd 08 07:04 PM |
Dumb Reg question | John Gaquin | Piloting | 67 | May 4th 05 04:54 AM |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |