![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I posted this over at rec.aviation.student, but forgot to crosspost it
here.. Thought I'd CC it here and see if I can get any info, as there's been no response there yet.. A few questions for those more knowledgable... Is there a defined flightschool / flight training syllabus in the USA? Other countries? The reason I ask is that I spend alot of time reading various message boards, here in the newsgroups, as well as a few blogs, and it seems strange to me the amount of variety in training methods, sequences, and procedures that I read. Here in Canada, the syllabus is laid out by Transport Canada, and based on my experience so far, is followed by all designated flight training units and instructors. All students learn the same lessons, generally in the same order. The published syllabus is available right on the Transport Canada website: http://www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/ge...artII/menu.htm The only variences to the training regiment are based on student ability. If the student needs extra training on something in particular, then the lesson plan stops, and is repeated untill adequate progress is made. Then, it continues where it left off, in sequence fashion. Yes, some lessons can be done out of sequence, within reason.. For example, I had to wait some time to get my spin training out of the way as the winter months were very cold this past winter, and the thermal stresses placed on the engine from those sorts of maneuvers were deemed extreme enough to delay the lesson, as opposed to cracking cylinder heads. Also, although "Approach and Landing" is not listed untill exercise 18, I was obviously doing them (or at least attempting, right from the first flight) long before that exercise came up.. However, the finer points of such were taught, and practiced in more detail, once lesson 18 arrived. However, you see what I mean... There is still a laid-out regiment for the most part. Some of the message boards I read have students that seem to be overwhelmed, and I personally think it's because their instructors have then all over the map when it comes to lesson plans.. When I read about some students being pushed under the hood in their first few flights, or are doing stall training on their 3'rd flight, or flying cross-countries very early on in their training, it baffles me. Just curious... --- Mark Morissette Courtice, Ontario, Canada http://oshawapilot.blogspot.com (My student pilot blog) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Another Frustrated Student Pilot | OutofRudder | Piloting | 13 | January 24th 04 02:20 AM |
Student-Instructor question (USA) | Nolaminar | Soaring | 18 | December 1st 03 06:25 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |
Retroactive correction of logbook errors | Marty Ross | Piloting | 10 | July 31st 03 06:44 AM |