![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many of you guys carry renter's insurance? I never have in the past but I'm
older and wiser now and have been thinking about it. Specifically, that offered through AOPA. How much hull insurance is necessary? I'm pretty sure the FBO insures their aircraft but surely there's a deductible I need to consider. Your thoughts? -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You need to talk to the FBO and do a risk analysis of how much risk you
want to take vs. how much you are willing to pay for insurance. You can't deligate all risks in life to insurance co's, you just need to decide how much risk you are willing to take vs. how much you are willing to pay to deligate. If the FBO is a business their insurance may or may not cover you, the renter, for liability (in my experience most policies do). If the FBO is a club it almost certainly will cover you for liability. There are a lot of trolls in this news group that believe you should continue to buy insurance until you run out of money. Please don't listen to them and do your own risk analysis. -Robert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:51:32 GMT, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
wrote in : : Your thoughts? The Non-owners Policy should probably cover the FBO's deductible amount, and loss of service as a minimum. There is also the issue of subrogation to address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Larry Dighera wrote:
The Non-owners Policy should probably cover the FBO's deductible amount, and loss of service as a minimum. There is also the issue of subrogation to address. The base policy (with AOPA's company) covers damage to others and property but not the aircraft itself. Depending on how much hull insurance I add, the premium goes up *very* rapidly and significantly. That's why I thought to only cover the FBO's deductible. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote: The base policy (with AOPA's company) covers damage to others and property but not the aircraft itself. Depending on how much hull insurance I add, the premium goes up *very* rapidly and significantly. That's why I thought to only cover the FBO's deductible. It may be expensive, just realize that you could be on the hook for whole hull value if you were to blame for the damage. The way it (normally) works is that the FBO's insurance covers the FBO. They will pay the FBO for the loss of the hull, minus the deductible. The insurance company can then go after you to recover their loss (subrogation that Larry mentioned). That's why renters' insurance exists. It protects you, the renter, from having to cough up for the hull. From a marketing standpoint, I think the insurance companies' motivations to offer renters' insurance was a stroke of genius. Liability and hull for renters costs nearly as much as if you owned. In the old days before renters insurance, the companies could only make money from one policy on each aircraft. Now you have what amounts to multiple people, paying multiple premiums to insure the same aircraft for the same risk. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From a marketing standpoint, I think the insurance companies'
motivations to offer renters' insurance was a stroke of genius. Liability and hull for renters costs nearly as much as if you owned. In the old days before renters insurance, the companies could only make money from one policy on each aircraft. Now you have what amounts to multiple people, paying multiple premiums to insure the same aircraft for the same risk. To be fair to the companies, the risk (for any given aircraft) goes up (or at least is less controlled) if there are multiple pilots flying it. If I own a plane and fly it myself, I can get one rate based on my experience. But if I let all comers fly it, then the special deal I got because of my incredibly perfect flying ability shouldn't be expected to hold. I have no control over what the next dolt will do to my plane, and neither does the insurance company. Jose -- The price of freedom is... well... freedom. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Jose posted:
To be fair to the companies, the risk (for any given aircraft) goes up (or at least is less controlled) if there are multiple pilots flying it. If I own a plane and fly it myself, I can get one rate based on my experience. But if I let all comers fly it, then the special deal I got because of my incredibly perfect flying ability shouldn't be expected to hold. I have no control over what the next dolt will do to my plane, and neither does the insurance company. Yes, but the insurance company has only one aircraft to repair or replace, regardless of how many people are flying it. Their total hull loss costs are fixed. Unlike the income from renter pilots who buy insurance, their liability doesn't increase in a multiplicative relationship. For example, if 100 renters' premiums were $1k/year for a $100k hull coverage, there is no risk. 110 renters' premiums = $10k pure profit, and *each year* that the plane isn't totalled, the whole amount is pure profit (the numbers used are just for convenient math). Neil |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I"m not sure what "normal" is. Of the 3 FBOs I've bothered to check
with 2 of them have policies that cover the renters for liability (as if they were named) and hull (minus deductable). The FBOs say it doesn't cost much more and if the renter gets sued odds are the FBO will be sued anyway. Its easier to keep friends and cover your renters on your policy. -Robert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 May 2005 15:22:36 -0700, "John Galban"
wrote: The way it (normally) works is that the FBO's insurance covers the FBO. They will pay the FBO for the loss of the hull, minus the deductible. The insurance company can then go after you to recover their loss I know that this does happen. When I was in training, I dinged a prop. The instructor's insurance company thought it should pay only the deductible, but the airport's insurance company demanded and got repayment of the whole amount of a new prop and the engine tear-down and inspection. I felt very badly about it. -- all the best, Dan Ford email (put Cubdriver in subject line) Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com the blog: www.danford.net In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are there many companies that sell renter insurance???
The place I was taking lessons from now requires renter insurance. Just wondering if the prices vary much? -- Have a good day and stay out of the trees! See ya on Sport Aircraft group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/ "Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote .. Larry Dighera wrote: The Non-owners Policy should probably cover the FBO's deductible amount, and loss of service as a minimum. There is also the issue of subrogation to address. The base policy (with AOPA's company) covers damage to others and property but not the aircraft itself. Depending on how much hull insurance I add, the premium goes up *very* rapidly and significantly. That's why I thought to only cover the FBO's deductible. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN VE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Renters insurance and TRIA | Scrabo | Piloting | 1 | February 20th 05 04:44 AM |
renter's insurance | RM | Piloting | 21 | April 29th 04 10:52 PM |
Renter's Insurance - Questions & Advice | Tino | General Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 08:44 PM |
Student Rotorcraft Renter's Insurance | Davdirect | Rotorcraft | 3 | January 5th 04 11:02 PM |
renters insurance ? | BTIZ | Owning | 4 | July 24th 03 12:20 PM |