A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Renter's Insurance?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 27th 05, 11:51 AM
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Renter's Insurance?

How many of you guys carry renter's insurance? I never have in the past but I'm
older and wiser now and have been thinking about it. Specifically, that offered
through AOPA.

How much hull insurance is necessary? I'm pretty sure the FBO insures their
aircraft but surely there's a deductible I need to consider.

Your thoughts?




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

VE


  #2  
Old May 27th 05, 01:28 PM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You need to talk to the FBO and do a risk analysis of how much risk you
want to take vs. how much you are willing to pay for insurance. You
can't deligate all risks in life to insurance co's, you just need to
decide how much risk you are willing to take vs. how much you are
willing to pay to deligate. If the FBO is a business their insurance
may or may not cover you, the renter, for liability (in my experience
most policies do). If the FBO is a club it almost certainly will cover
you for liability. There are a lot of trolls in this news group that
believe you should continue to buy insurance until you run out of
money. Please don't listen to them and do your own risk analysis.
-Robert

  #3  
Old May 27th 05, 01:50 PM
Larry Dighera
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 10:51:32 GMT, "Mortimer Schnerd, RN"
wrote in
: :


Your thoughts?


The Non-owners Policy should probably cover the FBO's deductible
amount, and loss of service as a minimum. There is also the issue of
subrogation to address.


  #4  
Old May 27th 05, 03:55 PM
Mortimer Schnerd, RN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Larry Dighera wrote:
The Non-owners Policy should probably cover the FBO's deductible
amount, and loss of service as a minimum. There is also the issue of
subrogation to address.



The base policy (with AOPA's company) covers damage to others and property but
not the aircraft itself. Depending on how much hull insurance I add, the
premium goes up *very* rapidly and significantly. That's why I thought to only
cover the FBO's deductible.




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

VE



  #5  
Old May 27th 05, 11:22 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mortimer Schnerd, RN wrote:

The base policy (with AOPA's company) covers damage to others and property but
not the aircraft itself. Depending on how much hull insurance I add, the
premium goes up *very* rapidly and significantly. That's why I thought to only
cover the FBO's deductible.


It may be expensive, just realize that you could be on the hook for
whole hull value if you were to blame for the damage. The way it
(normally) works is that the FBO's insurance covers the FBO. They will
pay the FBO for the loss of the hull, minus the deductible. The
insurance company can then go after you to recover their loss
(subrogation that Larry mentioned). That's why renters' insurance
exists. It protects you, the renter, from having to cough up for the
hull.

From a marketing standpoint, I think the insurance companies'
motivations to offer renters' insurance was a stroke of genius.
Liability and hull for renters costs nearly as much as if you owned.
In the old days before renters insurance, the companies could only make
money from one policy on each aircraft. Now you have what amounts to
multiple people, paying multiple premiums to insure the same aircraft
for the same risk.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

  #6  
Old May 27th 05, 11:31 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From a marketing standpoint, I think the insurance companies'
motivations to offer renters' insurance was a stroke of genius.
Liability and hull for renters costs nearly as much as if you owned.
In the old days before renters insurance, the companies could only make
money from one policy on each aircraft. Now you have what amounts to
multiple people, paying multiple premiums to insure the same aircraft
for the same risk.


To be fair to the companies, the risk (for any given aircraft) goes up
(or at least is less controlled) if there are multiple pilots flying it.
If I own a plane and fly it myself, I can get one rate based on my
experience. But if I let all comers fly it, then the special deal I got
because of my incredibly perfect flying ability shouldn't be expected to
hold. I have no control over what the next dolt will do to my plane,
and neither does the insurance company.

Jose
--
The price of freedom is... well... freedom.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #7  
Old May 28th 05, 02:13 AM
Neil Gould
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Recently, Jose posted:

To be fair to the companies, the risk (for any given aircraft) goes up
(or at least is less controlled) if there are multiple pilots flying
it. If I own a plane and fly it myself, I can get one rate based on
my experience. But if I let all comers fly it, then the special deal
I got because of my incredibly perfect flying ability shouldn't be
expected to hold. I have no control over what the next dolt will do
to my plane, and neither does the insurance company.

Yes, but the insurance company has only one aircraft to repair or replace,
regardless of how many people are flying it. Their total hull loss costs
are fixed. Unlike the income from renter pilots who buy insurance, their
liability doesn't increase in a multiplicative relationship. For example,
if 100 renters' premiums were $1k/year for a $100k hull coverage, there is
no risk. 110 renters' premiums = $10k pure profit, and *each year* that
the plane isn't totalled, the whole amount is pure profit (the numbers
used are just for convenient math).

Neil


  #8  
Old May 28th 05, 02:17 AM
Robert M. Gary
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I"m not sure what "normal" is. Of the 3 FBOs I've bothered to check
with 2 of them have policies that cover the renters for liability (as
if they were named) and hull (minus deductable). The FBOs say it
doesn't cost much more and if the renter gets sued odds are the FBO
will be sued anyway. Its easier to keep friends and cover your renters
on your policy.

-Robert

  #9  
Old May 28th 05, 10:56 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 27 May 2005 15:22:36 -0700, "John Galban"
wrote:

The way it
(normally) works is that the FBO's insurance covers the FBO. They will
pay the FBO for the loss of the hull, minus the deductible. The
insurance company can then go after you to recover their loss


I know that this does happen. When I was in training, I dinged a prop.
The instructor's insurance company thought it should pay only the
deductible, but the airport's insurance company demanded and got
repayment of the whole amount of a new prop and the engine tear-down
and inspection. I felt very badly about it.


-- all the best, Dan Ford

email (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum:
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
the blog: www.danford.net
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com
  #10  
Old June 8th 05, 07:19 AM
gilan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Are there many companies that sell renter insurance???
The place I was taking lessons from now requires renter insurance.
Just wondering if the prices vary much?
--
Have a good day and stay out of the trees!
See ya on Sport Aircraft group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Sport_Aircraft/







"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" wrote ..
Larry Dighera wrote:
The Non-owners Policy should probably cover the FBO's deductible
amount, and loss of service as a minimum. There is also the issue of
subrogation to address.



The base policy (with AOPA's company) covers damage to others and property
but not the aircraft itself. Depending on how much hull insurance I add,
the premium goes up *very* rapidly and significantly. That's why I
thought to only cover the FBO's deductible.




--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

VE





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Renters insurance and TRIA Scrabo Piloting 1 February 20th 05 04:44 AM
renter's insurance RM Piloting 21 April 29th 04 10:52 PM
Renter's Insurance - Questions & Advice Tino General Aviation 0 March 19th 04 08:44 PM
Student Rotorcraft Renter's Insurance Davdirect Rotorcraft 3 January 5th 04 11:02 PM
renters insurance ? BTIZ Owning 4 July 24th 03 12:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.