![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have recently bought a 1960 Aztec with generators. Although these
have been overhauled recently, i'd rather have alternators installed. I see InterAv have a generic kit. Has anyone installed this before? What is the time to install, and any issues with particular brand? Any feedback would be appreciated. Regards, Dean |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, I have no idea, but you may want to ask he
http://piperchat.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=4 or here http://www.piperapacheclub.com/ Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is there a real need for the switch? The gennies have worked for 45
years... They are reliable... They don't go overvoltage and fry your radios like an alternator can... Yes, they make less volts/current at idle and low rpm, but you don't have to have everything turned on until you roll onto the runway for take off... I have gennies still on Fat Albert the Apache (1957) and looked hard at the alternator issue and decided I was well off as is... cheers ... denny |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny,
It's not that I particularly wanted to rid of the generators, just that the existing maintenance company cant get them to work properly!! They dont have a vested interest as i'm taking the a/c to another mtce organisation. The new mtce guy is like you and doesnt think I should be so quick to dump them, but to troubleshoot the problems on the right generator first. Dean Denny wrote: Is there a real need for the switch? The gennies have worked for 45 years... They are reliable... They don't go overvoltage and fry your radios like an alternator can... Yes, they make less volts/current at idle and low rpm, but you don't have to have everything turned on until you roll onto the runway for take off... I have gennies still on Fat Albert the Apache (1957) and looked hard at the alternator issue and decided I was well off as is... cheers ... denny |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They are reliable...
They are less reliable than alternators. Alternators have solid commutators; generators have segmented ones - that's how a generator makes DC. No diodes. Those segmented commutators cause arcing, and that tends to foul them, get crap between the segments, etc. No big deal to polish, but not fun either. This goes double if a bit of oil that leaked from somewhere gets in there. They don't go overvoltage and fry your radios like an alternator can... Not true. Your generator can indeed go overvoltage. All it takes is a failure in the overvoltage cutout on the regulator, or a field short to ground. If the latter, the field switch will not be able to take the generator offline. In fact, NOTHING will take it offline short of pulling the breaker. On top of that, even pulling the breaker is not a solution when you're dealing with paralelled generators (and you are). That paralelling relay system was developed for tractors (so there would not be a need to built a very few expensive custom oversize generators) not airplanes (with redundancy in mind). The failure I described (field short to ground) is one that will take down the entire systems (as the paralelling relay attempts to balance loads) and really hurts the redundancy aspects. Yes, they make less volts/current at idle and low rpm, but you don't have to have everything turned on until you roll onto the runway for take off... Personally, I like to have all my avionics tunred on and set up when launching into IMC, but that's just me. In any case - I used to have all sorts of problems with my generator system, to the point where I kept a spare generator on the shelf. Then I replaced the 1930's-design vibrating point voltage regulators with a Zeftronics set ($500 or so for the pair) and all the problems went away, just like that. On top of that, the system is truly redundant now - the regulators talk to each other and balance the laod based on current, not voltage. If one is offline, it can't take down the other. I suggest that as the real fix - I've had experience with the InterAv conversion as well (friend had it on his PA-30) and was NOT impressed. It too is a non-redundant system (master contactor failure takes down the whole thing). The ideal soluteion would have been a truly redundant alternator system. I understand Zeftronics was working on that a couple of years ago - maybe they have it available now. I've certainly been way more impressed by their stuff than anything InterAv ever did. Michael |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then
I replaced the 1930's-design vibrating point voltage regulators with a Zeftronics set ($500 or so for the pair) and all the problems went away, just like that. On top of that, the system is truly redundant now - the regulators talk to each other and balance the laod based on current, not voltage. If one is offline, it can't take down the other. Michael, Could you elaborate more on the Zeftronics system and it's components? I believe that the regulators on our Aztec need adjustment as our left alternator has a larger draw on it than the right. I've been told that adjusting them isn't particularly fun and would be interested in the Zeftronics system should we find adjusting the regulators does not solve our output imbalance. Thanks as always, Jim Burns |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Burns wrote:
Could you elaborate more on the Zeftronics system and it's components? I believe that the regulators on our Aztec need adjustment as our left alternator has a larger draw on it than the right. Unfortunately, I know nothing about their alternator system - only the generator system. I've been told that adjusting them isn't particularly fun and would be interested in the Zeftronics system should we find adjusting the regulators does not solve our output imbalance. I'm familiar with the process. I've never seen anyone get it right except by luck. The mechanical regulators don't act the same with the caps on as they do with the caps off. Michael |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks.... I'll hunt them up at OSH tomorrow (hopefully)
Jim "Michael" wrote in message oups.com... Jim Burns wrote: Could you elaborate more on the Zeftronics system and it's components? I believe that the regulators on our Aztec need adjustment as our left alternator has a larger draw on it than the right. Unfortunately, I know nothing about their alternator system - only the generator system. I've been told that adjusting them isn't particularly fun and would be interested in the Zeftronics system should we find adjusting the regulators does not solve our output imbalance. I'm familiar with the process. I've never seen anyone get it right except by luck. The mechanical regulators don't act the same with the caps on as they do with the caps off. Michael |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK Dean, well that's just my opinion... Nothing wrong with either
alternators or gennies, just different methods to convert AC to DC.... Changing the system over to alternators is going to be expensive, and I personally would do it only if the generators and regulators were totally shot and needed to be replaced, then I would consider spending the money for switching... I have to say that all the chargingn failures I have had in flight over the past 4 decades have been the alternators... I recognize that is just happenstance... But, generators tend to give you lots of warning that they are hurting and I have been lucky enough to recognize the cry for help before failure... Not so with the alternator failures... Having said that, the RV7 I am building will have dual alternators... My suggestion is for you to spend the money for Bob Nucholl's book... You will be a bunch more aware of the pitfalls of charging systems after reading it (emminently readable and not loaded down with calculus equations, etc)... He likes alternators, BTW... Now, someone made a comment that one generator puts out more than the other... Let me comment that for the generators to have automatic selection, one has to have the regulator voltage set higher than the other, otherwise the selector relay will `hunt'.... As a result of the higher voltage set point that one will usually show more charging current than the other when tested separately... I have found that during local flights, turning off the gennie that always takes the load (port engine on mine) and allowing the other to work, keeps the starboard commutator healthy and ready to go if the port gennie does shut down for real... Also, forget the current meter - it's close to worthless... What you want is a voltage meter... On my plane the port engine regulator is adjusted to 14.1 volts and the starboard to 13.8 volts... I don't have problems with the selector relay hunting and the system works fine... cheers ... denny |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
: shut down for real... Also, forget the current meter - it's close to
: worthless... What you want is a voltage meter... On my plane the port : engine regulator is adjusted to 14.1 volts and the starboard to 13.8 : volts... Not sure if you're talking of an ammeter or a loadmeter. What one really needs to know the health of the system is *both* a voltmeter and loadmeter. If I could only have one or the other, however, I'd agree that a voltmeter is more useful. Anything under 13 and the alternator is maxing out (for a given RPM). Anything under 12.5 and the battery is discharging. Anything over 14.4-ish and the battery is boiling. -Cory -- ************************************************** *********************** * Cory Papenfuss * * Electrical Engineering candidate Ph.D. graduate student * * Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University * ************************************************** *********************** |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: Piper Aztec C | Jim Burns | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 20th 04 07:38 PM |
Piper Aztec and/or Apache owner groups? | Ronnie D. Hughes | Owning | 3 | April 1st 04 07:00 PM |
Piper Aztec F Model Dual Hydraulics(1976-1981) STC | Keith | Owning | 4 | February 12th 04 04:52 AM |
Piper Aztec F Model Dual Hydraulics(1976-1981) STC | Keith | Piloting | 0 | February 11th 04 10:49 AM |
Piper Aztec handling qualities | John McFarlane | Owning | 1 | October 3rd 03 04:11 PM |