A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hillary's Amendment



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 20th 05, 10:31 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hillary's Amendment

You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html
  #2  
Old August 20th 05, 10:38 PM
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


john smith wrote:
You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html


Surely you didn't expect anything different?
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #3  
Old August 21st 05, 12:53 AM
BlueSkyzz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

john smith wrote:

You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html


Please keep your politics out of this newsgroup - this is
rec.aviation.piloting, not alt.bash.hillary.

--
  #4  
Old August 21st 05, 01:05 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BlueSkyzz" wrote in message
...
john smith wrote:

You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html


Please keep your politics out of this newsgroup - this is
rec.aviation.piloting,


PILOTING!!!

How would this,

"A Senate amendment that called for severe fines, loss of license and
aircraft confiscation for violating the flight restricted zone (FRZ) in the
Washington air defense identification zone was stripped from the Department
of Homeland Security appropriations bill last month."

....be off topic?

not alt.bash.hillary.


Truth hurts, huh?


  #5  
Old August 21st 05, 04:24 PM
BlueSkyzz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matt Barrow wrote:

"BlueSkyzz" wrote in message
...

john smith wrote:


You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html


Please keep your politics out of this newsgroup - this is
rec.aviation.piloting,



PILOTING!!!

How would this,

"A Senate amendment that called for severe fines, loss of license and
aircraft confiscation for violating the flight restricted zone (FRZ) in the
Washington air defense identification zone was stripped from the Department
of Homeland Security appropriations bill last month."

...be off topic?


Never said it was off-topic, learn to read for comprehension. My
complaint was with the political insinuations raised by the OP.

not alt.bash.hillary.



Truth hurts, huh?


LOL! Guess you'll really enjoy paying $3, $4, ($5?) for gas, won't you?
And you're obviously too blind to see the connections to the current
regime. Ah well, ignorance is bliss... :-)

--
  #6  
Old August 21st 05, 06:13 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



BlueSkyzz wrote:




You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html




Never said it was off-topic, learn to read for comprehension. My
complaint was with the political insinuations raised by the OP.



How does the above statement insinuate anything political?

  #7  
Old August 21st 05, 06:20 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Newps" wrote in message
...


BlueSkyzz wrote:




You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html




Never said it was off-topic, learn to read for comprehension. My
complaint was with the political insinuations raised by the OP.



How does the above statement insinuate anything political?


It's what he WANTS to see.

You snipped the other irrelevant blather he pulled out of his ass. :~)



  #8  
Old August 21st 05, 06:17 PM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"BlueSkyzz" wrote in message
...
Matt Barrow wrote:

"BlueSkyzz" wrote in message
...

john smith wrote:


You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html

Please keep your politics out of this newsgroup - this is
rec.aviation.piloting,



PILOTING!!!

How would this,

"A Senate amendment that called for severe fines, loss of license and
aircraft confiscation for violating the flight restricted zone (FRZ) in

the
Washington air defense identification zone was stripped from the

Department
of Homeland Security appropriations bill last month."

...be off topic?


Never said it was off-topic, learn to read for comprehension.


Try writing coherently.

My
complaint was with the political insinuations raised by the OP.


Calling it Hillary's amendment is political insinuation?

LOL! Guess you'll really enjoy paying $3, $4, ($5?) for gas, won't you?
And you're obviously too blind to see the connections to the current
regime. Ah well, ignorance is bliss... :-)


Speaking of comprehension, try keeping to the topic which is a proposed risk
assessment study.

You've got a wrap on ignorance: Gore, Kerry and Hillary all have said we
should be paying $5 a gallon for gas. Gore, largely, even campaigned on it,
wrote a book on it...

Try removing your head from your anal cavity and I see some big time
Freudian projection coming from your end.






  #9  
Old August 21st 05, 07:56 PM
George Patterson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BlueSkyzz wrote:

My
complaint was with the political insinuations raised by the OP.


What insinuations? Hillary introduced this ammendment, so the title is correct.
The ammendment replaces another more onerous one, so that statement that this
one popped up after we managed to eliminate another one is also correct. The OP
hasn't insinuated a damn thing.

You need to be complaining to yourself for reading things in that aren't there.

George Patterson
Give a person a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a person to
use the Internet and he won't bother you for weeks.
  #10  
Old August 22nd 05, 02:18 AM
Greg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BlueSkyzz wrote:

Matt Barrow wrote:

"BlueSkyzz" wrote in message
...

john smith wrote:


You get rid of one, and another pops up!

http://www.ainonline.com/issues/08_0...senate_03.html

Please keep your politics out of this newsgroup - this is
rec.aviation.piloting,



PILOTING!!!

How would this,

"A Senate amendment that called for severe fines, loss of license and
aircraft confiscation for violating the flight restricted zone (FRZ) in the
Washington air defense identification zone was stripped from the Department
of Homeland Security appropriations bill last month."

...be off topic?


Never said it was off-topic, learn to read for comprehension. My
complaint was with the political insinuations raised by the OP.


Political insinuations.....like your not-thinly-vailed reference to gasoline
prices and a REGIME? Apparently your dissuasion from political insinuations is
quite maleable, dependent on whose politics might be discussed.




not alt.bash.hillary.



Truth hurts, huh?


LOL! Guess you'll really enjoy paying $3, $4, ($5?) for gas, won't you?
And you're obviously too blind to see the connections to the current
regime.


Huh? One post ago you were saying, "Please KEEP YOUR POLITICS OUT OF THIS
NEWSGROUP" (emphasis added) immediately after somebody pointed out that the Jr.
Senator from NY has filed a very anti AVIATION amendment in the US Senate. Two
paragraphs ago you were heavily objecting to "political insinuations." Now you
suddenly morph from your "keep your politics out" tune to referring to certain
"connections to the current regime."

I'm curious, who is this regime you speak of, and would said regime happen to
include the aforementioned Senator who I believe did vote for many things,
including authorizing certain activities in the middle eastern region of the
world.

Ah well, ignorance is bliss... :-)


Oh Blue, do educate us, the little people, who aren't worthy to understand your
great teachings and important objections to pointing out anything political,
unless it is political speech approved by . . . . you.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airmens' Freedoms Threatened by Harsh Congressional Proposals Larry Dighera Piloting 24 July 29th 05 06:15 PM
"10km / only once" amendment K.P. Termaat Soaring 21 June 30th 04 02:59 PM
Hillary's visit to Afghanistan JD Military Aviation 0 December 9th 03 03:23 AM
L.A. Times -- Request and Amendment Blueskies Home Built 0 August 11th 03 02:35 AM
L.A. Times -- Request and Amendment Blueskies Piloting 0 August 11th 03 02:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.