![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm trying to do my homework on importing a glider from Germany to the
U.S. Shipping and registration issues shouldn't be a problem, but I'm curious about the flight instruments. Can I use the metric instruments in the states? I'm kind of used to metric instruments and I think that when doing most of my flight calculations, I would prefer to have metric instruments except for maybe adding a feet altimeter for ATC and airspace purposes. Does anyone know if there's any problem with this? I don't really want to have to replace all of my instruments. Any experience you can share would be very helpful. Thank you. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AFSax wrote:
I'm trying to do my homework on importing a glider from Germany to the U.S. Shipping and registration issues shouldn't be a problem, but I'm curious about the flight instruments. Can I use the metric instruments in the states? I'm kind of used to metric instruments and I think that when doing most of my flight calculations, I would prefer to have metric instruments except for maybe adding a feet altimeter for ATC and airspace purposes. Does anyone know if there's any problem with this? I don't really want to have to replace all of my instruments. Any experience you can share would be very helpful. Thank you. I know of at least one commercially operated glider (an ASW-24 in Parowan, UT) that's eqipped with metric instruments. That doesn't mean it's legal, but I strongly suspect it is based on that evidence. Jeremy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AFSax wrote:
I'm trying to do my homework on importing a glider from Germany to the U.S. Shipping and registration issues shouldn't be a problem, but I'm curious about the flight instruments. Can I use the metric instruments in the states? I'm kind of used to metric instruments and I think that when doing most of my flight calculations, I would prefer to have metric instruments except for maybe adding a feet altimeter for ATC and airspace purposes. Does anyone know if there's any problem with this? I don't really want to have to replace all of my instruments. Any experience you can share would be very helpful. Thank you. I know of at least one commercially operated glider (an ASW-24 in Parowan, UT) that's eqipped with metric instruments. That doesn't mean it's legal, but I strongly suspect it is based on that evidence. Jeremy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't see anything to indicate that it wouldn't be legal to stick
with the metric instruments as long as it meets the type certificate requirements, which it seems to. I will install a second TSO'd feet altimeter since charts and everything in the states is in feet, but I don't see why I'd have to change anything else. I know of at least one YAK airplane that has retained all of its original instruments except for a new feet altimeter and a transponder. If anyone has any other experiences let me know. Adam |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 12:18 22 August 2005, Afsax wrote:
I don't see anything to indicate that it wouldn't be legal to stick with the metric instruments as long as it meets the type certificate requirements, which it seems to. I will install a second TSO'd feet altimeter since charts and everything in the states is in feet, but I don't see why I'd have to change anything else. I know of at least one YAK airplane that has retained all of its original instruments except for a new feet altimeter and a transponder. If anyone has any other experiences let me know. Adam Except, perhaps, the ASI - so as not to confuse 50 kph with 50 knots in the heat of the moment ! This has, I am told, happened - with unfortunate consequences. I have imported a glider from Germany (to the UK) - and replaced the ASI and altimeter only - but left the fancy push/pull variometer and the (absolutely brilliant) Winter 'Sollfahrtgeber' entirely alone - with, absolutely, no problems. sta13nski. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stanford Korwin wrote:
At 12:18 22 August 2005, Afsax wrote: I don't see anything to indicate that it wouldn't be legal to stick with the metric instruments as long as it meets the type certificate requirements, which it seems to. I will install a second TSO'd feet altimeter since charts and everything in the states is in feet, but I don't see why I'd have to change anything else. I know of at least one YAK airplane that has retained all of its original instruments except for a new feet altimeter and a transponder. If anyone has any other experiences let me know. Adam Except, perhaps, the ASI - so as not to confuse 50 kph with 50 knots in the heat of the moment ! This has, I am told, happened - with unfortunate consequences. I have imported a glider from Germany (to the UK) - and replaced the ASI and altimeter only - but left the fancy push/pull variometer and the (absolutely brilliant) Winter 'Sollfahrtgeber' entirely alone - with, absolutely, no problems. sta13nski. I really wouldn't worry about the ASI. I fly my Open Cirrus (in the UK) on metric instruments. Its stall speed is lower than most glass gliders at (book figure) 63 kph. If I try to fly the approach at 50 kph, mistaking this for kt, I will realise my mistake in plenty of time to correct the stall. I must say that because the difference is nearly 100% between kt and kph I've never had a moment's confusion. I can't imagine anyone having this problem on the launch either, as the aircraft won't be flying at the 55 kph mark. However, mph and kt seems to me like a recipe for disaster if you fly an approach at the kt speed using an mph ASI. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:02:37 +0100, Chris Reed wrote:
I really wouldn't worry about the ASI. I fly my Open Cirrus (in the UK) on metric instruments. Its stall speed is lower than most glass gliders at (book figure) 63 kph. If I try to fly the approach at 50 kph, mistaking this for kt, I will realise my mistake in plenty of time to correct the stall. I must say that because the difference is nearly 100% between kt and kph I've never had a moment's confusion. I can't imagine anyone having this problem on the launch either, as the aircraft won't be flying at the 55 kph mark. Agreed. I've done virtually all my gliding in the UK using kts/ft instruments. However, in 2003 I visited the Wasserkruppe and flew there with no problems. Check ride was in an ASK-21. The ASI was the same model with the same coloured snake but a different numeric scale. My club has a couple of ASK-21s which I fly fairly regularly, so I know the sounds and where the needle should point so I had no problems. They then gave me a flight in an ASK-23, which I'd not flown before, but this time I was briefed with the right speeds, so again no problem. I was more bothered flying a kts/ft ASK-21 in America than I was flying the German metric one because for some reason known only to history and the FAA, American ASIs are upside down: at cruising speed the needle is straight down, not upright as it should be. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stanford Korwin wrote:
Except, perhaps, the ASI - so as not to confuse 50 kph with 50 knots in the heat of the moment ! This has, I am told, happened - with unfortunate consequences. I have imported a glider from Germany (to the UK) - If the glider was certificated in Germany, then I suspect it has a green arc, a yellow arc, a red line and, most helpful, a yellow triangle. Stefan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"AFSax" wrote: I'm trying to do my homework on importing a glider from Germany to the U.S. Shipping and registration issues shouldn't be a problem, but I'm curious about the flight instruments. Can I use the metric instruments in the states? I'm kind of used to metric instruments and I think that when doing most of my flight calculations, I would prefer to have metric instruments except for maybe adding a feet altimeter for ATC and airspace purposes. Does anyone know if there's any problem with this? I don't really want to have to replace all of my instruments. Any experience you can share would be very helpful. Thank you. When I imported my glider, I was told by the DAR that the metric instruments were not legal. I took him at his word. -- Take out the airplane for reply |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the input! I'm not really worried about flying with a
metric ASI since that's what I'm already used to from learning to soar here in Germany. I think I'd probably have a harder time adjusting to flying with a Knots ASI, but it wouldn't really be that much of an adjustment, just have to learn the important speeds again in knots. I'll talk to the FAA maintenance inspector that I know back home and see what he knows about the legality of instruments in a sailplane. The U.S. type certificate for the Phoebus says it must conform to the German type certificate which states that the glider must have an ASI and an altimeter, but the limits specified in the orginal German type certificate are all metric...go figure! Thanks everybody for your help and maybe I'll get to meet a few people when I get back to the states and start flying there again...although I don't know exactly where in the states I'll be going yet. Adam |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Metric measuring tool source? | DL152279546231 | Home Built | 12 | April 29th 04 02:13 AM |
Reverse Vacuum Damging to Instruments? | O. Sami Saydjari | Owning | 8 | February 16th 04 04:00 AM |
metric system newsgroup call for votes #1 | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 72 | November 16th 03 06:59 PM |
Edwards air show B-1 speed record attempt | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 146 | November 3rd 03 05:18 PM |
Wanted - Metric Altimeters | RHWOODY | Soaring | 0 | September 13th 03 10:20 PM |