![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anybody know how the cylinder studs/ thru-bolts are located on the old
E-185-225 series Cont. Engines ?? Usually one of 2 ways, either a bolt circle diameter with so many degrees offset from a horiz or vert C/L of the bore of the cylinder-----Or, rectangular measurements from a horiz. and /or vert. line . Thanx ahead 'o time, muddled motor man |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a pusher airplane with a nose oil cooler.
I am replacing the existing heavy hydraulic type(rubber/braided steel) oil cooler lines with lighter metal lines. Either soft Aluminum or soft copper 1/2 lines. First question. I would like to use the lines as my ground return and remove the 2 AWG wire I have now. Good idea? Second question. Which would be better, or possibly which would be worse and why? Copper or Aluminum.. Aluminum would be lighter but copper offers a better ground return(less resistance). I have a big engine and the starter needs all the current I can muster. Scott |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Scott Derrick wrote: I have a pusher airplane with a nose oil cooler. I am replacing the existing heavy hydraulic type(rubber/braided steel) oil cooler lines with lighter metal lines. Either soft Aluminum or soft copper 1/2 lines. First question. I would like to use the lines as my ground return and remove the 2 AWG wire I have now. Good idea? *DAMN*STUPID* one! Consider the cross-section area of #2 wire, then compare with the cross-section area of the walls of the tubing. Without considering what happens if/when a line _breaks_. "Instant" spark across the gap, With a ready supply of fuel being delivered to the scene. Second question. Which would be better, or possibly which would be worse and why? Copper or Aluminum.. Aluminum would be lighter but copper offers a better ground return(less resistance). I have a big engine and the starter needs all the current I can muster. For the same current load, you need (minimum) 1 gauge larger wire, if AL, vs what you need for Cu. That equates to circa 30% more material, by volume. Which negates a fair bit of weight difference. Your last statement *should* answer your question. for max current transfer efficiency, use the best conductor you can, at the largest size you can justify. Scott |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Derrick" wrote in message ... I have a pusher airplane with a nose oil cooler. I am replacing the existing heavy hydraulic type(rubber/braided steel) oil cooler lines with lighter metal lines. Either soft Aluminum or soft copper 1/2 lines. I would NEVER use copper for an important thing like an oil line, on anything that has a motor, and vibration. Copper will work harden from the vibration, and fail. Not "if" but "when." It will happen, if there is any possibility of flexing. -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I would NEVER use copper for an important thing like an oil line, on anything that has a motor, and vibration. Copper will work harden from the vibration, and fail. Not "if" but "when." It will happen, if there is any possibility of flexing. That's two things you shouldn never do. Copper lines and use any fluid line as a ground. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don Hammer" wrote in message news:1126039198.a572e3b81309f32dba604a668d4c9128@t eranews... I would NEVER use copper for an important thing like an oil line, on anything that has a motor, and vibration. Copper will work harden from the vibration, and fail. Not "if" but "when." It will happen, if there is any possibility of flexing. That's two things you shouldn never do. Copper lines and use any fluid line as a ground. Yep. One reason is all would need, and either one of ours would do it. -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
also look at early o-470s. Share the same cylinders.
jerry wass wrote: Anybody know how the cylinder studs/ thru-bolts are located on the old E-185-225 series Cont. Engines ?? Usually one of 2 ways, either a bolt circle diameter with so many degrees offset from a horiz or vert C/L of the bore of the cylinder-----Or, rectangular measurements from a horiz. and /or vert. line . Thanx ahead 'o time, muddled motor man |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jerry wass wrote:
Anybody know how the cylinder studs/ thru-bolts are located on the old E-185-225 series Cont. Engines ?? Usually one of 2 ways, either a bolt circle diameter with so many degrees offset from a horiz or vert C/L of the bore of the cylinder-----Or, rectangular measurements from a horiz. and /or vert. line . Thanx ahead 'o time, muddled motor man Well it is on a bolt circle, 6.375 " to be exact---NOW if I just knew the degrees of separation, I could make me some shims.. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NY Go Kart Endurance Racing - Arrive & Drive - No Experience Needed | OVRPNY | Owning | 1 | May 19th 05 04:56 PM |
NY Go Kart Endurance Racing - Arrive & Drive - No Experience Needed | OVRPNY | Piloting | 0 | May 19th 05 02:01 AM |
builder assistance needed | AINut | Home Built | 0 | April 8th 05 07:05 AM |
B-17 dimensions... particulars... | Ali-Reza Anghaie | Military Aviation | 1 | December 29th 03 05:05 PM |
Bell Jetranger cockpit dimensions | HW | Rotorcraft | 1 | September 16th 03 10:49 AM |