![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nothing on 1-26 list archives. Anyone comment on whether the 1-26
championships (SSA sanctioned I presume) will require ELT's for 2006? Though they appear to race under their own division rules, I can't determine from what's available online whether ELT's only apply to FAI and Sports classes at Regional and National, or whether the requirement is broader. TIA, Frank Whiteley Colorado |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I asked this question earlier this year and somebody replied that the
1-26 Association races per their own rules (which they do) however, the SRA proposal says "SSA sanctioned" contests and the 1-26 Nats are SSA sanctioned, so maybe they need to apply for an exemption or whatever. Maybe better not to ask the question, we might not like the answer ;-) Jim Frank Whiteley wrote: Nothing on 1-26 list archives. Anyone comment on whether the 1-26 championships (SSA sanctioned I presume) will require ELT's for 2006? Though they appear to race under their own division rules, I can't determine from what's available online whether ELT's only apply to FAI and Sports classes at Regional and National, or whether the requirement is broader. TIA, Frank Whiteley Colorado |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Region 12 contest director mentioned that there have been requests
for exemption from some SSA contest rules...usually the answer is no... Sometimes a contest will NOT be sanctioned by SSA (I think there were facility issues somewhere once...), so the 1-26 Association could consider having the contest outside the SSA sanction...there may be bylaw issues calling it a "contest" or an official "Champoinships." If the Assn wants the exemption, they ought to petition for it early. And hold the "unsanctioned" card in the hip pocket. My understanding of the SSA ELT requirement is that the usual contestants were polled about "proposed rule" and the majority said NOOOO!, but SSA charged ahead "to protect the contest sponsors." Grrr. Other threads are out there touching on the practicality of the ELT rule, especially with the 121 vs. 406 MHz transition, technology and cost. For once, I wish the SSA had moved as slowly as the FAA does... Pete |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some sites may find an insurance bite by running a contest without the
SSA sanction. In our case, our premises liability is not in effect during any 'air meet'. A contest policy is something like $850 for non-SSA sanctioned events, $550 for SSA sanctioned events. This applies to just about every gaggling that might be an 'air meet' except camps, which we're told are okay. I personally think the greater impact will be on Sports class participation when combined with the obviously higher costs of competing next year. We have one club with 7 or 8 1-26's here in Colorado in the club and private fleet and a few more dotted around the state. No idea if anyone from Colorado is planning on competing in the 1-26 championships next year, but we have our state gathering coming up next month and the question may come up. Thought an answer might be nice to have. Frank Whiteley |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, the SSA "Seal of Approval" only cost $200? That would not pay for
he first ELT!!! A collection from the pilots ($10 apiece for a 20 ship 1-26 contest) would surely be worth it, and (knowing 1-26ers) I bet you could get the contestants to pony up! FWIW, my 1-26 DOES have an ELT. I'm just amazed that SSA forced the issue, especially considering the impending 121/406 MHz switch. I suspect they didn't fully consider the state of the industry...perhaps getting a waiver/exception is in order, and (using FAA parlance) an alternative means of compliance (AMOC) woule allow the use of Personal Locater Beacons. I haven't decided for sure if I'll compete at Parowan next year -- even though the ELT issue doesn't quite impact me. I care deeply about my bretheren. -Pete #309 Frank Whiteley wrote: A contest policy is something like $850 for non-SSA sanctioned events, $550 for SSA sanctioned events. Frank Whiteley |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Actually, $200 will pay for the ELT, although installation may be
additional. I don't fly contests, but for $200, how can you justify not having one if you fly X/C. Even with the coming 406 conversion, pay $200 now, and wait for a few years until the price of 406 ELT's comes down by more than that. I got my ELT signed off with the last annual, so no additional cost to me. Anyone flying X/C in sanctioned contests or not should get an ELT installed before the next annual. It's just selfish to put others at unnecessary risk for the cost of a few tows. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wow, the SSA "Seal of Approval" only cost $200? That would not pay for
he first ELT!!! A collection from the pilots ($10 apiece for a 20 ship 1-26 contest) would surely be worth it, and (knowing 1-26ers) I bet you could get the contestants to pony up! FWIW, my 1-26 DOES have an ELT. I'm just amazed that SSA forced the issue, especially considering the impending 121/406 MHz switch. I suspect they didn't fully consider the state of the industry...perhaps getting a waiver/exception is in order, and (using FAA parlance) an alternative means of compliance (AMOC) woule allow the use of Personal Locater Beacons. I haven't decided for sure if I'll compete at Parowan next year -- even though the ELT issue doesn't quite impact me. I care deeply about my bretheren. -Pete #309 Frank Whiteley wrote: A contest policy is something like $850 for non-SSA sanctioned events, $550 for SSA sanctioned events. Frank Whiteley |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's $550 on top of sanctioning fees (whatever that is for the 1-26
contest), but that's moot, as the 1-26 Champs draws a plenty of competitors. Indeed, the 'air meet' insurance may not even be required at many sites, depending on underwriter. However, it has put the damper on some local, friendly contests at sites like my club's gliderport since our former Rocky Mountain Soaring Contest was never SSA sanctioned and attendance was not very large. Now it has an $850 insurance tag for three days of flying if we ever hold our local contest again. FWIW, my club did host the 1-26 contest in 1989 and have been approached to do so again since. I agree with your other points WRT PLB, the 123/406 technology, and poor timing of the decision. Frank 309 wrote: Wow, the SSA "Seal of Approval" only cost $200? That would not pay for he first ELT!!! A collection from the pilots ($10 apiece for a 20 ship 1-26 contest) would surely be worth it, and (knowing 1-26ers) I bet you could get the contestants to pony up! sniP -Pete #309 Frank Whiteley wrote: A contest policy is something like $850 for non-SSA sanctioned events, $550 for SSA sanctioned events. Frank Whiteley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cherokee Pilots Association Fly-In Just Gets Better and Better | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 7 | August 8th 05 07:18 PM |
Dutch Homebuilt Association NVAV Fly-in on 3-4-5 June 2005 | Zier en van de Steenoven | Home Built | 0 | May 9th 05 09:53 AM |
Cessna Flyers Association | Roger Long | Piloting | 7 | October 20th 04 01:14 AM |
National Cherokee Pilots Association Fly-In PIREP | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 2 | June 21st 04 04:02 PM |
US TEAM NEWS FROM THE 28th WORLD GLIDING CHAMPIONSHIPS | John Seaborn | Soaring | 0 | July 27th 03 02:23 AM |