Information about this crash, please?

Can anyone tell me anything about this crash?:

http://www.alexisparkinn.com/photoga...Puma_Crash.wmv

A contributor sent it in for inclusion on our aviation video page, but
he knew nothing about the location or circumstances of the accident.

If you're interested, the whole page may be viewed he

www.AlexisParkInn.com/aviation_videos.htm

Thanks,
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

Jay Honeck wrote:
Can anyone tell me anything about this crash?:

From what's visible in the video, the tail rotor is slowing down, getting very
slow by the time the chopper goes over. My bet is that the pilot hit the ground
with the tail rotor when he touched down. After that, it's equal & opposite
reaction time.

George Patterson
Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to
your slightly older self.

Yikes! I think G was right - he touched down kinda hard in a tail low
attitude and pranged the tail rotor. What I don't understand was why he
got airborne again when he shoulda dumped the collective and planted
it. The first guy that got thrown out was right in the path of the main
rotor when the helo rolled on its side it looked like..

Same, looks like he tagged the tail rotor and broke the shear
coupling, loosing TR authority.

Shoulda planted the collective right then, but I was not there, so I
am not to criticize.. ...

Dono if the 1st guy made it away or not, he was running when the
camera last saw him..

Dave



On 5 Dec 2005 17:06:32 -0800, "
wrote:

Yikes! I think G was right - he touched down kinda hard in a tail low
attitude and pranged the tail rotor. What I don't understand was why he
got airborne again when he shoulda dumped the collective and planted
it. The first guy that got thrown out was right in the path of the main
rotor when the helo rolled on its side it looked like..

Yeah, George was correct. Chopper lost tail rotor authority after
ground strike. More analysis by pro helo pilots and techies here
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H2C52254C .

The Monk

Dave wrote in
:

On 5 Dec 2005 17:06:32 -0800, "
wrote:

Yikes! I think G was right - he touched down kinda hard in a tail low
attitude and pranged the tail rotor. What I don't understand was why he
got airborne again when he shoulda dumped the collective and planted
it. The first guy that got thrown out was right in the path of the main
rotor when the helo rolled on its side it looked like..

Same, looks like he tagged the tail rotor and broke the shear
coupling, loosing TR authority.

Shoulda planted the collective right then, but I was not there, so I
am not to criticize.. ...

Dono if the 1st guy made it away or not, he was running when the
camera last saw him..

Dave

Here's my admitedly uneducated guess.

If the tail rotor hits the ground and breaks "stuff", then
the engine suddenly has an excess of power due to the lack
of drag because it's no longer driving the tail. That surge
of power then causes the main rotor to speed up causing
extra lift.

Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
Like censorship and not getting support help? Switch to Supernews!
They won't even answer questions through your ISP!

Brian wrote:
If the tail rotor hits the ground and breaks "stuff", then
the engine suddenly has an excess of power due to the lack
of drag because it's no longer driving the tail. That surge
of power then causes the main rotor to speed up causing
extra lift.

Excellent observation, I agree...

Flyingmonk wrote:

Brian wrote:

If the tail rotor hits the ground and breaks "stuff", then
the engine suddenly has an excess of power due to the lack
of drag because it's no longer driving the tail. That surge
of power then causes the main rotor to speed up causing
extra lift.


Excellent observation, I agree...


And extra torque that the damaged tail can no longer counter.

Matt

And extra torque that the damaged tail can no longer counter.

That too!

Did you see the link I posted to PPrune about the same acident,
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H2C52254C it even shows 'snap shots' that
shows and explains critical moments?

Flyingmonk wrote:

And extra torque that the damaged tail can no longer counter.


That too!

Did you see the link I posted to PPrune about the same acident,
http://makeashorterlink.com/?H2C52254C it even shows 'snap shots' that
shows and explains critical moments?


No, I missed that link. I saw the still shots shown above, but without
seeing the video first it was hard to get the gist of it.


Matt