![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
NASA is seaking private contractors to handle the cargo flights to space
station. Do you think that Burt Rutan will jump on chance to bid for that? Toks Desalu |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Toks Desalu" wrote in message news:mJQmf.1473$Bj4.1244@trndny01... NASA is seaking private contractors to handle the cargo flights to space station. Do you think that Burt Rutan will jump on chance to bid for that? IMHO, no. NASA would expect the winner to be ready to start bringing cargo soon after the bid is awarded. That would mean that the winner would have to have a system in place, or nearly so, already. That will mean it will have to be a non reusable system,, probably unmanned, and that is not where he is headed. Reusable or not, by bet is that the winner will be unmanned. Just my guesses. -- Jim in NC |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Toks Desalu" wrote in message news:mJQmf.1473$Bj4.1244@trndny01... NASA is seaking private contractors to handle the cargo flights to space station. Do you think that Burt Rutan will jump on chance to bid for that? Toks Desalu I wouldn't think so at this time. What Rutan has demonstrated is the ability to boost a relatively low speed craft to the edge of space. Putting something into orbit is a whole 'nother ballgame due to the far higher velocity required. The higher speed would require a much more efficient (and possibly complex) propulsion system. Beyond that, if the goal is to bring anything back from orbit, he'd have to develop a different re-entry system, because the one on Spaceship One is a relatively low speed system. My guess is you'll see the big aerospace contractors take a look at this one. KB |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There's another company poised to capitalize on this bid process. It's run
by one of the multi-millionaire internet startup youngster types. Apparently, they can do the job for a fraction of the current cost with 100% reusable components sans fuel. Small company, low overhead etc etc. There was a piece on public radio the other day discussing this very topic. I apologize for being so vague... "Toks Desalu" wrote in message news:mJQmf.1473$Bj4.1244@trndny01... NASA is seaking private contractors to handle the cargo flights to space station. Do you think that Burt Rutan will jump on chance to bid for that? Toks Desalu |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:38:01 -0500, "Morgans" wrote:
"Toks Desalu" wrote in message news:mJQmf.1473$Bj4.1244@trndny01... NASA is seaking private contractors to handle the cargo flights to space station. Do you think that Burt Rutan will jump on chance to bid for that? IMHO, no. NASA would expect the winner to be ready to start bringing cargo soon after the bid is awarded. That would mean that the winner would have to have a system in place, or nearly so, already. That will mean it will have to be a non reusable system,, probably unmanned, and that is not where he is headed. Reusable or not, by bet is that the winner will be unmanned. Just my guesses. I don't disagree with you too far, but: It's possible that Rutan could make the cargo ship by leveraging the hardware he's building for the suborbital ships. On the Discovery TV show last year, they showed a SpaceShipOne-class vehicle atop of Falcon rocket. A Falcon V could take a SS1 to orbit, though getting it DOWN again might be problem. But with an unmanned ship, that ain't an issue, and, in fact, increases your payload capability by eliminating wings, etc. Remember, no American astronaut flew atop a rocket specifically developed for manned flight until the Apollo program. All the rockets in Mercury and Gemini were designed for unmanned "cargo" missions. Rutan's smartest move would be to grab the NASA contract and let the US Government fund the development of an unmanned orbital system....then he could adapt it for manned use. Ron Wanttaja |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JeffM wrote: There's another company poised to capitalize on this bid process. It's run by one of the multi-millionaire internet startup youngster types............... I think maybe you are thinking of this new launch company : http://www.spacex.com/ Its founded and run by Elon Musk, co-founder of Paypal. They are nearly ready for their first launch....and have designed/planned to grow to much bigger launch vehicles. You can subscribe to their email newsletter for continuing news updates. Rich A. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() NASA is seaking private contractors to handle the cargo flights to space station. Do you think that Burt Rutan will jump on chance to bid for that? I agree with the "no" camp, but not for any technological or economic reasons. Rutan has a history of expressing great distaste for government bureaucracies. NASA is as bureaucratic a farce as government can get (otherwise we wouldn't even have this nearly useless ISS needing supplies to begin with). Daniel |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
fuel subsidies for Angle Flight pilots | sashley | Piloting | 17 | September 11th 05 09:25 AM |
Angel Flight and Part 91 | Dave Butler | Piloting | 8 | July 8th 05 03:43 AM |
Radio outage at ZLA grounds flights | A Guy Called Tyketto | Piloting | 0 | September 15th 04 05:56 AM |
FAA to End part 91 Sightseeing flights? | Vaughn | Rotorcraft | 7 | November 2nd 03 01:20 AM |
Ownership and passengers | Roger Long | Owning | 30 | October 11th 03 02:00 PM |